解除大动脉-冠状神经节起搏反应可提高去神经支配疗效。

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24250
Poornima Balaji, Xingzhou Liu, Vu Toan Tran, Michael A Barry, Albert Vien, Edward Yang, Duc Minh Nguyen, Urja Patel, Juntang Lu, Shirley Alvarez, Sushil Bandodkar, Winny Varikatt, Alistair McEwan, Stuart P Thomas, Pierre C Qian
{"title":"解除大动脉-冠状神经节起搏反应可提高去神经支配疗效。","authors":"Poornima Balaji, Xingzhou Liu, Vu Toan Tran, Michael A Barry, Albert Vien, Edward Yang, Duc Minh Nguyen, Urja Patel, Juntang Lu, Shirley Alvarez, Sushil Bandodkar, Winny Varikatt, Alistair McEwan, Stuart P Thomas, Pierre C Qian","doi":"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter renal denervation (RDN) remains inconsistent despite developments in ablation technologies, due to the lack of an intraprocedural physiological end point. The aim of this study was to identify if aorticorenal ganglion (ARG) guided RDN using microwave (MW) catheter leads to more consistent denervation outcomes compared with empirical MW ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pigs underwent sham procedure (n=8) or bilateral RDN using an in-house built open-irrigated MW catheter. Before denervation, ipsilateral ARG pacing was performed leading to renal artery vasoconstriction. MW ablation group (MW-group; n=7) received 1 ablation (100-120 W for 360 seconds) in the mid-main renal artery based on artery caliber. ARG-guided-MW ablation group (ARG-MW-group; n=7) was permitted an additional ablation more distally or at higher power until a vasoconstrictive response was abolished. Animals were euthanized at 4 to 5 weeks post-procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ARG pacing caused an ipsilateral reduction in renal artery caliber from 4.67 to 4 mm; <i>P</i>=0.0006 in MW-group and 4.8 to 3.9 mm; <i>P</i>=0.001 in ARG-MW-group. Repeat ARG pacing at euthanasia led to a reduction in renal artery caliber in MW-group from 5.1 to 4.8 mm; <i>P</i>=0.006, but not in ARG-MW-group from 4.88 to 4.55 mm; <i>P</i>=0.08. There were no differences in ablation injury volumes between the groups. Compared with undenervated sham controls, ARG-MW-RDN versus MW-RDN caused median reductions in viable nerve area (antityrosine hydroxylase staining) at 4 to 5 weeks by 92.6% (interquartile range, 0.94-19.59%; <i>P</i><0.0001) versus 55.02% (interquartile range, 15.87-75.11%; <i>P</i>=0.006) and median renal cortical norepinephrine content by 68.06% (interquartile range, 27.16-38.39%; <i>P</i><0.0001) versus 25.25% (interquartile range, 56.97-157.7%; <i>P</i>=NS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ARG pacing serves as a physiological procedural end point to guide MW denervation to improve denervation outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"680-689"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abolition of Aorticorenal Ganglia Pacing Responses Improves Denervation Efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"Poornima Balaji, Xingzhou Liu, Vu Toan Tran, Michael A Barry, Albert Vien, Edward Yang, Duc Minh Nguyen, Urja Patel, Juntang Lu, Shirley Alvarez, Sushil Bandodkar, Winny Varikatt, Alistair McEwan, Stuart P Thomas, Pierre C Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter renal denervation (RDN) remains inconsistent despite developments in ablation technologies, due to the lack of an intraprocedural physiological end point. The aim of this study was to identify if aorticorenal ganglion (ARG) guided RDN using microwave (MW) catheter leads to more consistent denervation outcomes compared with empirical MW ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pigs underwent sham procedure (n=8) or bilateral RDN using an in-house built open-irrigated MW catheter. Before denervation, ipsilateral ARG pacing was performed leading to renal artery vasoconstriction. MW ablation group (MW-group; n=7) received 1 ablation (100-120 W for 360 seconds) in the mid-main renal artery based on artery caliber. ARG-guided-MW ablation group (ARG-MW-group; n=7) was permitted an additional ablation more distally or at higher power until a vasoconstrictive response was abolished. Animals were euthanized at 4 to 5 weeks post-procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ARG pacing caused an ipsilateral reduction in renal artery caliber from 4.67 to 4 mm; <i>P</i>=0.0006 in MW-group and 4.8 to 3.9 mm; <i>P</i>=0.001 in ARG-MW-group. Repeat ARG pacing at euthanasia led to a reduction in renal artery caliber in MW-group from 5.1 to 4.8 mm; <i>P</i>=0.006, but not in ARG-MW-group from 4.88 to 4.55 mm; <i>P</i>=0.08. There were no differences in ablation injury volumes between the groups. Compared with undenervated sham controls, ARG-MW-RDN versus MW-RDN caused median reductions in viable nerve area (antityrosine hydroxylase staining) at 4 to 5 weeks by 92.6% (interquartile range, 0.94-19.59%; <i>P</i><0.0001) versus 55.02% (interquartile range, 15.87-75.11%; <i>P</i>=0.006) and median renal cortical norepinephrine content by 68.06% (interquartile range, 27.16-38.39%; <i>P</i><0.0001) versus 25.25% (interquartile range, 56.97-157.7%; <i>P</i>=NS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ARG pacing serves as a physiological procedural end point to guide MW denervation to improve denervation outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"680-689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24250\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24250","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于缺乏术中生理终点,尽管消融技术发展,经导管肾去神经支配(RDN)仍然不一致。目的:探讨微波(MW)导管在主动脉冠肾神经节(ARG)引导下的RDN去神经效果是否比经验微波消融更一致。方法:猪采用假手术(n=8)或双侧RDN,使用内部建造的开放冲洗MW导管。去神经支配前,行同侧ARG起搏导致肾动脉血管收缩。MW消融组(MW组;n=7)根据动脉口径在肾中主动脉行1次消融(100- 120w,持续360秒)。arg - mw消融组(arg - mw组;N =7)允许在更远端或更高的功率下进行额外消融,直到血管收缩反应消失。动物在手术后4至5周被安乐死。结果:ARG起搏导致同侧肾动脉口径从4.67 mm减少到4 mm;mw组和4.8 ~ 3.9 mm组P=0.0006;arg - mw组P=0.001。安乐死时重复ARG起搏导致mw组肾动脉口径从5.1 mm降至4.8 mm;P=0.006, arg - mw组在4.88 ~ 4.55 mm间无显著差异;P = 0.08。两组间消融损伤体积无差异。与未接种疫苗的假对照组相比,ARG-MW-RDN与MW-RDN在4至5周时可活神经面积(抗酪氨酸羟化酶染色)中位数减少92.6%(四分位数间差,0.94-19.59%;PP=0.006),肾皮质中位去甲肾上腺素含量降低68.06%(四分位数间差27.16 ~ 38.39%;页= NS)。结论:ARG起搏可作为指导中脑去神经的生理程序性终点,改善去神经效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abolition of Aorticorenal Ganglia Pacing Responses Improves Denervation Efficacy.

Background: Transcatheter renal denervation (RDN) remains inconsistent despite developments in ablation technologies, due to the lack of an intraprocedural physiological end point. The aim of this study was to identify if aorticorenal ganglion (ARG) guided RDN using microwave (MW) catheter leads to more consistent denervation outcomes compared with empirical MW ablation.

Methods: Pigs underwent sham procedure (n=8) or bilateral RDN using an in-house built open-irrigated MW catheter. Before denervation, ipsilateral ARG pacing was performed leading to renal artery vasoconstriction. MW ablation group (MW-group; n=7) received 1 ablation (100-120 W for 360 seconds) in the mid-main renal artery based on artery caliber. ARG-guided-MW ablation group (ARG-MW-group; n=7) was permitted an additional ablation more distally or at higher power until a vasoconstrictive response was abolished. Animals were euthanized at 4 to 5 weeks post-procedure.

Results: ARG pacing caused an ipsilateral reduction in renal artery caliber from 4.67 to 4 mm; P=0.0006 in MW-group and 4.8 to 3.9 mm; P=0.001 in ARG-MW-group. Repeat ARG pacing at euthanasia led to a reduction in renal artery caliber in MW-group from 5.1 to 4.8 mm; P=0.006, but not in ARG-MW-group from 4.88 to 4.55 mm; P=0.08. There were no differences in ablation injury volumes between the groups. Compared with undenervated sham controls, ARG-MW-RDN versus MW-RDN caused median reductions in viable nerve area (antityrosine hydroxylase staining) at 4 to 5 weeks by 92.6% (interquartile range, 0.94-19.59%; P<0.0001) versus 55.02% (interquartile range, 15.87-75.11%; P=0.006) and median renal cortical norepinephrine content by 68.06% (interquartile range, 27.16-38.39%; P<0.0001) versus 25.25% (interquartile range, 56.97-157.7%; P=NS).

Conclusions: ARG pacing serves as a physiological procedural end point to guide MW denervation to improve denervation outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension
Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信