脆弱性社区累积影响评估的多学科视角:采用德尔菲法的专家启发。

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ann Verwiel, William Rish
{"title":"脆弱性社区累积影响评估的多学科视角:采用德尔菲法的专家启发。","authors":"Ann Verwiel, William Rish","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjae051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prompted by a series of executive orders, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is promoting cumulative impact assessment (CIA) to integrate numerous factors that have the potential to impact community health, which include nonchemical stressors such as socioeconomic conditions, pre-existing health conditions, and many others that historically have not been addressed by USEPA's chemical risk assessment paradigm. Understanding the cumulative impact of all stressors on responses to environmental exposures requires multidisciplinary input from social scientists, economists, and others not traditionally involved in chemical risk assessments. To gather input from these disciplines, a group of 13 independent experts with perspectives on CIA as a social scientist, economist, public health expert, or decision analyst participated in a virtual workshop to obtain their perspectives regarding key aspects of CIA. The independent experts, who have decades of experience studying cumulative impacts in vulnerable population groups and environmental justice (EJ), responded anonymously to charge questions specific to their expertise and then were asked to review and comment on other's responses within and outside their discipline. The questions and responses were organized by the authors into general topics (e.g., screening tools and indexes, role of nonchemical stressors in cumulative impacts, uncertainties), and discussions across and within the four disciplines were summarized by the authors. The expert's opinions were used to frame a set of future research objectives to advance the development of CIA and improve its use in the EJ context. Specifically, the experts' recommendations addressed the need for regulatory impact analysis, the appropriate use of screening tool information and indexes, the role and measurement of nonchemical stressors, relevance of a risk modifier approach to CIA, inclusion of uncertainty and causality, metrics to assess effectiveness of interventions, and methods for community communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":"301-313"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidisciplinary perspectives on cumulative impact assessment for vulnerable communities: expert elicitation using a Delphi method.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Verwiel, William Rish\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/inteam/vjae051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prompted by a series of executive orders, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is promoting cumulative impact assessment (CIA) to integrate numerous factors that have the potential to impact community health, which include nonchemical stressors such as socioeconomic conditions, pre-existing health conditions, and many others that historically have not been addressed by USEPA's chemical risk assessment paradigm. Understanding the cumulative impact of all stressors on responses to environmental exposures requires multidisciplinary input from social scientists, economists, and others not traditionally involved in chemical risk assessments. To gather input from these disciplines, a group of 13 independent experts with perspectives on CIA as a social scientist, economist, public health expert, or decision analyst participated in a virtual workshop to obtain their perspectives regarding key aspects of CIA. The independent experts, who have decades of experience studying cumulative impacts in vulnerable population groups and environmental justice (EJ), responded anonymously to charge questions specific to their expertise and then were asked to review and comment on other's responses within and outside their discipline. The questions and responses were organized by the authors into general topics (e.g., screening tools and indexes, role of nonchemical stressors in cumulative impacts, uncertainties), and discussions across and within the four disciplines were summarized by the authors. The expert's opinions were used to frame a set of future research objectives to advance the development of CIA and improve its use in the EJ context. Specifically, the experts' recommendations addressed the need for regulatory impact analysis, the appropriate use of screening tool information and indexes, the role and measurement of nonchemical stressors, relevance of a risk modifier approach to CIA, inclusion of uncertainty and causality, metrics to assess effectiveness of interventions, and methods for community communication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"301-313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844341/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjae051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjae051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一系列行政命令的推动下,美国环境保护署(USEPA)正在推动累积影响评估(CIA),以整合可能影响社区健康的众多因素,其中包括非化学压力因素,如社会经济条件、预先存在的健康状况,以及许多其他历史上未被USEPA化学品风险评估范式解决的因素。了解所有压力源对环境暴露反应的累积影响需要社会科学家、经济学家和其他传统上不参与化学品风险评估的人的多学科投入。为了收集这些学科的意见,由13名独立专家组成的小组作为社会科学家、经济学家、公共卫生专家或决策分析师参加了一个虚拟研讨会,以获得他们对中央情报局关键方面的看法。这些独立专家拥有数十年研究弱势群体累积影响和环境正义(EJ)的经验,他们匿名回答了针对其专业知识的问题,然后被要求对其学科内外的其他人的回答进行审查和评论。这些问题和回答由作者整理成一般主题(例如,筛选工具和指标,非化学应激源在累积影响中的作用,不确定性),作者总结了四个学科之间和内部的讨论。专家的意见被用来构建一套未来的研究目标,以推进CIA的发展,并改善其在EJ背景下的使用。具体而言,专家们的建议解决了监管影响分析的需要、筛选工具信息和指标的适当使用、非化学应激源的作用和测量、CIA风险修正方法的相关性、不确定性和因果关系的纳入、评估干预措施有效性的指标以及社区沟通的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multidisciplinary perspectives on cumulative impact assessment for vulnerable communities: expert elicitation using a Delphi method.

Prompted by a series of executive orders, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is promoting cumulative impact assessment (CIA) to integrate numerous factors that have the potential to impact community health, which include nonchemical stressors such as socioeconomic conditions, pre-existing health conditions, and many others that historically have not been addressed by USEPA's chemical risk assessment paradigm. Understanding the cumulative impact of all stressors on responses to environmental exposures requires multidisciplinary input from social scientists, economists, and others not traditionally involved in chemical risk assessments. To gather input from these disciplines, a group of 13 independent experts with perspectives on CIA as a social scientist, economist, public health expert, or decision analyst participated in a virtual workshop to obtain their perspectives regarding key aspects of CIA. The independent experts, who have decades of experience studying cumulative impacts in vulnerable population groups and environmental justice (EJ), responded anonymously to charge questions specific to their expertise and then were asked to review and comment on other's responses within and outside their discipline. The questions and responses were organized by the authors into general topics (e.g., screening tools and indexes, role of nonchemical stressors in cumulative impacts, uncertainties), and discussions across and within the four disciplines were summarized by the authors. The expert's opinions were used to frame a set of future research objectives to advance the development of CIA and improve its use in the EJ context. Specifically, the experts' recommendations addressed the need for regulatory impact analysis, the appropriate use of screening tool information and indexes, the role and measurement of nonchemical stressors, relevance of a risk modifier approach to CIA, inclusion of uncertainty and causality, metrics to assess effectiveness of interventions, and methods for community communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESTOXICOLOGY&nbs-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas: Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making Health and ecological risk and impact assessment Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems Sustaining ecosystems Managing large-scale environmental change Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society: Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信