Huan Wang, Chuang Gao, Magalie Guignard-Duff, Christian Cole, Christopher Hall, Resham Baruah, Shikta Das, He Gao, Jil Billy Mamza, Chim C Lang, Ify R Mordi
{"title":"通过射血分数谱对住院患者和门诊患者心衰诊断:一项人群队列研究。","authors":"Huan Wang, Chuang Gao, Magalie Guignard-Duff, Christian Cole, Christopher Hall, Resham Baruah, Shikta Das, He Gao, Jil Billy Mamza, Chim C Lang, Ify R Mordi","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early heart failure (HF) diagnosis is crucial to ensure that optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is administered to reduce morbidity and mortality. Limited access to echocardiography could lead to a later diagnosis for patients, for example, during an HF hospitalisation (hHF). This study aimed to compare the incidence and outcomes of inpatient versus outpatient diagnosis of HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic health records were linked to echocardiography data between 2015 and 2021 from patients in Tayside, Scotland (population~450 000). Incident HF diagnosis was classified into inpatient or outpatient and stratified by ejection fraction (EF). A non-HF comparator group with normal left ventricular function was also defined. The primary outcome was time to cardiovascular death or hHF within 12 months of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5223 individuals were identified, 4231 with HF (1115 heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 666 heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction, 1402 heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and 1048 HF with unknown EF) and 992 with non-HF comparators. Of the 4231 HF patients, 2169 (51.3%) were diagnosed as inpatients. The primary outcome was observed in 1193 individuals with HF (28.1%) and 32 (3.2%) non-HF comparators and was significantly more likely to occur in individuals diagnosed as inpatients than outpatients (809 vs 384 events; adjusted HR: 1.62 (1.39-1.89), p<0.001), and this was consistent regardless of EF. For HFrEF patients first diagnosed as inpatients, those discharged on ≥2 GDMT had a reduced incidence of the primary outcome compared with those discharged on <2 GDMT (303 vs 175 events; adjusted HR: 0.72 (0.55-0.94), p=0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals whose first presentation was a HF hospitalisation had a significantly worse outcome than those who were diagnosed in the community. Among hospitalised individuals, higher use of GDMT was associated with improved outcomes. Our results highlight the importance of improving diagnostic pathways to allow for earlier identification and treatment of HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":"523-531"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inpatient versus outpatient diagnosis of heart failure across the spectrum of ejection fraction: a population cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Huan Wang, Chuang Gao, Magalie Guignard-Duff, Christian Cole, Christopher Hall, Resham Baruah, Shikta Das, He Gao, Jil Billy Mamza, Chim C Lang, Ify R Mordi\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early heart failure (HF) diagnosis is crucial to ensure that optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is administered to reduce morbidity and mortality. Limited access to echocardiography could lead to a later diagnosis for patients, for example, during an HF hospitalisation (hHF). This study aimed to compare the incidence and outcomes of inpatient versus outpatient diagnosis of HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic health records were linked to echocardiography data between 2015 and 2021 from patients in Tayside, Scotland (population~450 000). Incident HF diagnosis was classified into inpatient or outpatient and stratified by ejection fraction (EF). A non-HF comparator group with normal left ventricular function was also defined. The primary outcome was time to cardiovascular death or hHF within 12 months of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5223 individuals were identified, 4231 with HF (1115 heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 666 heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction, 1402 heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and 1048 HF with unknown EF) and 992 with non-HF comparators. Of the 4231 HF patients, 2169 (51.3%) were diagnosed as inpatients. The primary outcome was observed in 1193 individuals with HF (28.1%) and 32 (3.2%) non-HF comparators and was significantly more likely to occur in individuals diagnosed as inpatients than outpatients (809 vs 384 events; adjusted HR: 1.62 (1.39-1.89), p<0.001), and this was consistent regardless of EF. For HFrEF patients first diagnosed as inpatients, those discharged on ≥2 GDMT had a reduced incidence of the primary outcome compared with those discharged on <2 GDMT (303 vs 175 events; adjusted HR: 0.72 (0.55-0.94), p=0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals whose first presentation was a HF hospitalisation had a significantly worse outcome than those who were diagnosed in the community. Among hospitalised individuals, higher use of GDMT was associated with improved outcomes. Our results highlight the importance of improving diagnostic pathways to allow for earlier identification and treatment of HF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"523-531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324160\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:早期心衰(HF)诊断对于确保最佳指导药物治疗(GDMT)的实施以降低发病率和死亡率至关重要。获得超声心动图的机会有限可能导致患者较晚的诊断,例如在心衰住院期间(hHF)。本研究旨在比较心衰住院和门诊诊断的发生率和结果。方法:将2015年至2021年苏格兰泰赛德(人口约45万)患者的电子健康记录与超声心动图数据相关联。事件HF诊断分为住院或门诊,并以射血分数(EF)分层。另外还定义了左心室功能正常的非hf比较组。主要终点是诊断后12个月内心血管死亡或hHF的时间。结果:总共有5223人被确定,其中4231人为心力衰竭(1115人为心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF), 666人为心力衰竭伴射血分数轻度降低,1402人为心力衰竭伴射血分数保留,1048人为心力衰竭伴未知EF), 992人为非HF比较者。在4231例HF患者中,2169例(51.3%)被诊断为住院患者。主要结局在1193例HF患者(28.1%)和32例非HF比较者中观察到,并且住院患者比门诊患者更有可能发生(809 vs 384;调整后的HR: 1.62(1.39-1.89),结论:首次出现HF住院的个体的预后明显差于在社区诊断的个体。在住院患者中,较高的GDMT使用量与改善的预后相关。我们的研究结果强调了改善诊断途径的重要性,以允许早期识别和治疗心衰。
Inpatient versus outpatient diagnosis of heart failure across the spectrum of ejection fraction: a population cohort study.
Background: Early heart failure (HF) diagnosis is crucial to ensure that optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is administered to reduce morbidity and mortality. Limited access to echocardiography could lead to a later diagnosis for patients, for example, during an HF hospitalisation (hHF). This study aimed to compare the incidence and outcomes of inpatient versus outpatient diagnosis of HF.
Methods: Electronic health records were linked to echocardiography data between 2015 and 2021 from patients in Tayside, Scotland (population~450 000). Incident HF diagnosis was classified into inpatient or outpatient and stratified by ejection fraction (EF). A non-HF comparator group with normal left ventricular function was also defined. The primary outcome was time to cardiovascular death or hHF within 12 months of diagnosis.
Results: In total, 5223 individuals were identified, 4231 with HF (1115 heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 666 heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction, 1402 heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and 1048 HF with unknown EF) and 992 with non-HF comparators. Of the 4231 HF patients, 2169 (51.3%) were diagnosed as inpatients. The primary outcome was observed in 1193 individuals with HF (28.1%) and 32 (3.2%) non-HF comparators and was significantly more likely to occur in individuals diagnosed as inpatients than outpatients (809 vs 384 events; adjusted HR: 1.62 (1.39-1.89), p<0.001), and this was consistent regardless of EF. For HFrEF patients first diagnosed as inpatients, those discharged on ≥2 GDMT had a reduced incidence of the primary outcome compared with those discharged on <2 GDMT (303 vs 175 events; adjusted HR: 0.72 (0.55-0.94), p=0.016).
Conclusions: Individuals whose first presentation was a HF hospitalisation had a significantly worse outcome than those who were diagnosed in the community. Among hospitalised individuals, higher use of GDMT was associated with improved outcomes. Our results highlight the importance of improving diagnostic pathways to allow for earlier identification and treatment of HF.
期刊介绍:
Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.