{"title":"痛风发作对健康相关生活质量的影响:泰国的一项多中心横断面研究","authors":"Piyameth Dilokthornsakul, Worawit Louthrenoo, Parawee Chevaisrakul, Boonjing Siripaitoon, Kanon Jatuworapruk, Nilawan Upakdee, Bodin Buttham, Patapong Towiwat","doi":"10.1007/s10067-025-07339-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) instrument has been used to determine health-related quality of life and health utility in gout, it is used in comparing health utility among gout flare (GF) and non-gout flare (non-GF) patients is still limited. This study aimed to compare health utility among GF and non-GF patients in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-center cross-sectional study, patients with GF and non-GF were interviewed for the EQ-5D5L and EQ-Visual Analog Scale (VAS) instruments by rheumatologists or trained research staffs. Patients with GF were subdivided into 2 subgroups (those who received no treatment and those who received treatment less than 48 h after GF episode).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and sixteen patients (108 GF and 108 non-GF patients), males in 90.28%, were included. The gout disease duration was significantly longer in the non-GF than in the GF groups (median, 10 vs 5 years; p = 0.004). There was no difference in the tophi present between the two groups. When compared with the non-GF group, the GF patients significantly had low health utility (0.34 ± 0.36 vs. 0.89 ± 0.15, p < 0.001) and EQ-VAS score (54.73 ± 25.14 vs. 84.06 ± 13.38, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis of the non-GF group, there was insignificant health utility and EQ-VAS score between those with tophi and those without tophi (0.87 ± 0.14 vs. 0.90 ± 0.15, p = 0.124 and 83.36 ± 14.92 vs. 84.33 ± 12.83, p = 0.938, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that GF clearly had a substantial impact on patients' quality of life. Targeted interventions in managing GF patients to improve their health outcomes are needed. Key Points • Patients with gout flare had lower health utility than those without gout flare. • The clinical significance of the utility and EQ-VAS was evaluated by the EQ-5D-5L instrument between gout flare and non-gout flare groups in Thai gouty patients. • Regarding the presence of tophi or disease duration, no significant differences in health utility and EQ-VAS were observed in the gout flare or non-gout flare group. • Targeted interventions for management of gout flare are needed to improve the health outcomes of gout flare patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10482,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"1317-1327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of gout flare on health-related quality of life: a multi-center cross-sectional study in Thailand.\",\"authors\":\"Piyameth Dilokthornsakul, Worawit Louthrenoo, Parawee Chevaisrakul, Boonjing Siripaitoon, Kanon Jatuworapruk, Nilawan Upakdee, Bodin Buttham, Patapong Towiwat\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10067-025-07339-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) instrument has been used to determine health-related quality of life and health utility in gout, it is used in comparing health utility among gout flare (GF) and non-gout flare (non-GF) patients is still limited. This study aimed to compare health utility among GF and non-GF patients in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-center cross-sectional study, patients with GF and non-GF were interviewed for the EQ-5D5L and EQ-Visual Analog Scale (VAS) instruments by rheumatologists or trained research staffs. Patients with GF were subdivided into 2 subgroups (those who received no treatment and those who received treatment less than 48 h after GF episode).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and sixteen patients (108 GF and 108 non-GF patients), males in 90.28%, were included. The gout disease duration was significantly longer in the non-GF than in the GF groups (median, 10 vs 5 years; p = 0.004). There was no difference in the tophi present between the two groups. When compared with the non-GF group, the GF patients significantly had low health utility (0.34 ± 0.36 vs. 0.89 ± 0.15, p < 0.001) and EQ-VAS score (54.73 ± 25.14 vs. 84.06 ± 13.38, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis of the non-GF group, there was insignificant health utility and EQ-VAS score between those with tophi and those without tophi (0.87 ± 0.14 vs. 0.90 ± 0.15, p = 0.124 and 83.36 ± 14.92 vs. 84.33 ± 12.83, p = 0.938, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that GF clearly had a substantial impact on patients' quality of life. Targeted interventions in managing GF patients to improve their health outcomes are needed. Key Points • Patients with gout flare had lower health utility than those without gout flare. • The clinical significance of the utility and EQ-VAS was evaluated by the EQ-5D-5L instrument between gout flare and non-gout flare groups in Thai gouty patients. • Regarding the presence of tophi or disease duration, no significant differences in health utility and EQ-VAS were observed in the gout flare or non-gout flare group. • Targeted interventions for management of gout flare are needed to improve the health outcomes of gout flare patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1317-1327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-025-07339-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-025-07339-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:虽然5级EQ-5D版本(EQ-5D- 5l)仪器已被用于确定痛风患者的健康相关生活质量和健康效用,但用于比较痛风发作(GF)和非痛风发作(非GF)患者的健康效用仍然有限。本研究旨在比较泰国GF和非GF患者的健康效用。方法:在这项多中心横截面研究中,由风湿病学家或经过培训的研究人员对GF和非GF患者进行EQ-5D5L和eq -视觉模拟量表(VAS)的访谈。GF患者被细分为2个亚组(未接受治疗组和GF发作后48小时内接受治疗组)。结果:共纳入216例(GF 108例,非GF 108例),男性占90.28%。非GF组痛风病程明显长于GF组(中位数,10年vs 5年;p = 0.004)。在两组之间存在的痛风石没有差异。与非GF组相比,GF组患者的健康效用明显较低(0.34±0.36 vs 0.89±0.15,p)。结论:本研究发现GF对患者的生活质量有明显的影响。有针对性的干预措施管理GF患者,以改善其健康结果是必要的。•痛风发作患者的健康效用低于没有痛风发作的患者。•通过EQ-5D-5L仪器评估泰国痛风患者痛风发作组和非痛风发作组之间的效用和EQ-VAS的临床意义。•关于痛风或疾病持续时间的存在,在痛风发作组和非痛风发作组中没有观察到健康效用和EQ-VAS的显著差异。•需要有针对性的干预措施来管理痛风耀斑,以改善痛风耀斑患者的健康结果。
Impact of gout flare on health-related quality of life: a multi-center cross-sectional study in Thailand.
Objective: Although the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) instrument has been used to determine health-related quality of life and health utility in gout, it is used in comparing health utility among gout flare (GF) and non-gout flare (non-GF) patients is still limited. This study aimed to compare health utility among GF and non-GF patients in Thailand.
Methods: In this multi-center cross-sectional study, patients with GF and non-GF were interviewed for the EQ-5D5L and EQ-Visual Analog Scale (VAS) instruments by rheumatologists or trained research staffs. Patients with GF were subdivided into 2 subgroups (those who received no treatment and those who received treatment less than 48 h after GF episode).
Results: Two hundred and sixteen patients (108 GF and 108 non-GF patients), males in 90.28%, were included. The gout disease duration was significantly longer in the non-GF than in the GF groups (median, 10 vs 5 years; p = 0.004). There was no difference in the tophi present between the two groups. When compared with the non-GF group, the GF patients significantly had low health utility (0.34 ± 0.36 vs. 0.89 ± 0.15, p < 0.001) and EQ-VAS score (54.73 ± 25.14 vs. 84.06 ± 13.38, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis of the non-GF group, there was insignificant health utility and EQ-VAS score between those with tophi and those without tophi (0.87 ± 0.14 vs. 0.90 ± 0.15, p = 0.124 and 83.36 ± 14.92 vs. 84.33 ± 12.83, p = 0.938, respectively).
Conclusion: This study found that GF clearly had a substantial impact on patients' quality of life. Targeted interventions in managing GF patients to improve their health outcomes are needed. Key Points • Patients with gout flare had lower health utility than those without gout flare. • The clinical significance of the utility and EQ-VAS was evaluated by the EQ-5D-5L instrument between gout flare and non-gout flare groups in Thai gouty patients. • Regarding the presence of tophi or disease duration, no significant differences in health utility and EQ-VAS were observed in the gout flare or non-gout flare group. • Targeted interventions for management of gout flare are needed to improve the health outcomes of gout flare patients.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Rheumatology is an international English-language journal devoted to publishing original clinical investigation and research in the general field of rheumatology with accent on clinical aspects at postgraduate level.
The journal succeeds Acta Rheumatologica Belgica, originally founded in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society. Clinical Rheumatology aims to cover all modern trends in clinical and experimental research as well as the management and evaluation of diagnostic and treatment procedures connected with the inflammatory, immunologic, metabolic, genetic and degenerative soft and hard connective tissue diseases.