美国普通人群食物过敏治疗偏好:离散选择实验。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2025.2459784
Alexis T Mickle, Christina E Ciaccio, Arpamas Seetasith, Karissa M Johnston, Jessica S Dunne, Stacey Kowal, Andrea Bever, Stella Ko, Vincent Garmo, Sachin Gupta, Andrew Lloyd, Christopher M Warren
{"title":"美国普通人群食物过敏治疗偏好:离散选择实验。","authors":"Alexis T Mickle, Christina E Ciaccio, Arpamas Seetasith, Karissa M Johnston, Jessica S Dunne, Stacey Kowal, Andrea Bever, Stella Ko, Vincent Garmo, Sachin Gupta, Andrew Lloyd, Christopher M Warren","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2459784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify treatment preferences for food allergy management options (oral immunotherapy, biologic therapy, and allergen avoidance), overall and by sociodemographic strata.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A US general population (≥13 years) discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted, including the Intolerance of Uncertainty-12 Scale and clinical/demographic questions. Conditional logistic regression analyses were conducted overall and by sociodemographic factors. DCE results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 294) mean (standard deviation) age was 47 (19.7) years; 48.6% were male. A 1% reduction in risk of having an exposure resulting in a moderate-to-severe reaction was statistically significantly associated with treatment preference (OR: 1.10; CI:1.04-1.16; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Features significantly associated with reduced preference included: a 1% increase in risk of treatment-related, severe anaphylaxis (0.85; 0.74-0.97; <i>p</i>=0.02); a 1% increase in risk of gastrointestinal symptoms (0.99; 0.99-0.99; <i>p</i> < 0.01); daily treatment (<i>vs.</i> every 2-4 weeks; 0.81; 0.72-0.91; <i>p</i> < 0.01); in-clinic administration (<i>vs.</i> at-home; 0.76; 0.66-0.87; <i>p</i> < 0.01); subcutaneous administration (<i>vs.</i> oral; 0.69; 0.61-0.78; <i>p</i> < 0.01); three-hour post-treatment physical activity limitation (0.84; 0.77-0.93; <i>p</i> < 0.01); and one-year life expectancy reduction (0.87; 0.85-0.89; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Rural dwellers favoured at-home use and no activity limits; lower-income respondents preferred convenience (oral, less frequent, and at-home administration). Teens strongly preferred being bite-safe (<i>vs.</i> fully allergic; 2.75; 1.09-6.90; <i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When making food allergy management decisions, US general population respondents had strong preferences for features related to safety and convenience; however, the magnitude of preferences varied by sociodemographic factors. These findings may be pertinent for population-level health decision makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"269-279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"US general population food allergy treatment preferences: a discrete choice experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis T Mickle, Christina E Ciaccio, Arpamas Seetasith, Karissa M Johnston, Jessica S Dunne, Stacey Kowal, Andrea Bever, Stella Ko, Vincent Garmo, Sachin Gupta, Andrew Lloyd, Christopher M Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03007995.2025.2459784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify treatment preferences for food allergy management options (oral immunotherapy, biologic therapy, and allergen avoidance), overall and by sociodemographic strata.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A US general population (≥13 years) discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted, including the Intolerance of Uncertainty-12 Scale and clinical/demographic questions. Conditional logistic regression analyses were conducted overall and by sociodemographic factors. DCE results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 294) mean (standard deviation) age was 47 (19.7) years; 48.6% were male. A 1% reduction in risk of having an exposure resulting in a moderate-to-severe reaction was statistically significantly associated with treatment preference (OR: 1.10; CI:1.04-1.16; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Features significantly associated with reduced preference included: a 1% increase in risk of treatment-related, severe anaphylaxis (0.85; 0.74-0.97; <i>p</i>=0.02); a 1% increase in risk of gastrointestinal symptoms (0.99; 0.99-0.99; <i>p</i> < 0.01); daily treatment (<i>vs.</i> every 2-4 weeks; 0.81; 0.72-0.91; <i>p</i> < 0.01); in-clinic administration (<i>vs.</i> at-home; 0.76; 0.66-0.87; <i>p</i> < 0.01); subcutaneous administration (<i>vs.</i> oral; 0.69; 0.61-0.78; <i>p</i> < 0.01); three-hour post-treatment physical activity limitation (0.84; 0.77-0.93; <i>p</i> < 0.01); and one-year life expectancy reduction (0.87; 0.85-0.89; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Rural dwellers favoured at-home use and no activity limits; lower-income respondents preferred convenience (oral, less frequent, and at-home administration). Teens strongly preferred being bite-safe (<i>vs.</i> fully allergic; 2.75; 1.09-6.90; <i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When making food allergy management decisions, US general population respondents had strong preferences for features related to safety and convenience; however, the magnitude of preferences varied by sociodemographic factors. These findings may be pertinent for population-level health decision makers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"269-279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2459784\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2459784","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:量化食物过敏管理选择的治疗偏好(口服免疫治疗、生物治疗和过敏原避免),总体上和按社会人口阶层划分。方法:对美国普通人群(≥13岁)进行离散选择实验(DCE),包括12个以治疗特征为重点的DCE选择集;不确定度不容度─12量表(IUS-12);以及临床/人口统计学问题。对整体和年龄、收入、城市化、受教育程度、食物和其他社会人口因素进行条件logistic回归分析,并以95%置信区间(ci)的比值比(ORs)表示。结果:参与者(n = 294)平均(标准差)年龄为47(19.7)岁;48.6%为男性。与统计学上显著的不选择治疗相关的治疗特征包括:暴露导致中度至重度反应的风险降低1%(测试范围为0-10%;结论:在做出食物过敏管理决策时,美国普通人群受访者对安全性和便利性有强烈的偏好;然而,偏好的大小因社会人口因素而异。这些发现可能与人口水平的健康决策者有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
US general population food allergy treatment preferences: a discrete choice experiment.

Objective: To quantify treatment preferences for food allergy management options (oral immunotherapy, biologic therapy, and allergen avoidance), overall and by sociodemographic strata.

Methods: A US general population (≥13 years) discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted, including the Intolerance of Uncertainty-12 Scale and clinical/demographic questions. Conditional logistic regression analyses were conducted overall and by sociodemographic factors. DCE results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Participants (n = 294) mean (standard deviation) age was 47 (19.7) years; 48.6% were male. A 1% reduction in risk of having an exposure resulting in a moderate-to-severe reaction was statistically significantly associated with treatment preference (OR: 1.10; CI:1.04-1.16; p < 0.01). Features significantly associated with reduced preference included: a 1% increase in risk of treatment-related, severe anaphylaxis (0.85; 0.74-0.97; p=0.02); a 1% increase in risk of gastrointestinal symptoms (0.99; 0.99-0.99; p < 0.01); daily treatment (vs. every 2-4 weeks; 0.81; 0.72-0.91; p < 0.01); in-clinic administration (vs. at-home; 0.76; 0.66-0.87; p < 0.01); subcutaneous administration (vs. oral; 0.69; 0.61-0.78; p < 0.01); three-hour post-treatment physical activity limitation (0.84; 0.77-0.93; p < 0.01); and one-year life expectancy reduction (0.87; 0.85-0.89; p < 0.01). Rural dwellers favoured at-home use and no activity limits; lower-income respondents preferred convenience (oral, less frequent, and at-home administration). Teens strongly preferred being bite-safe (vs. fully allergic; 2.75; 1.09-6.90; p = 0.03).

Conclusion: When making food allergy management decisions, US general population respondents had strong preferences for features related to safety and convenience; however, the magnitude of preferences varied by sociodemographic factors. These findings may be pertinent for population-level health decision makers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信