地沙单抗和唑来膦酸对绝经后骨质疏松症、骨密度和无脂质量的影响。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jeonghoon Ha, Jinyoung Kim, Chaiho Jeong, Jeongmin Lee, Yejee Lim, Ki-Hyun Baek
{"title":"地沙单抗和唑来膦酸对绝经后骨质疏松症、骨密度和无脂质量的影响。","authors":"Jeonghoon Ha,&nbsp;Jinyoung Kim,&nbsp;Chaiho Jeong,&nbsp;Jeongmin Lee,&nbsp;Yejee Lim,&nbsp;Ki-Hyun Baek","doi":"10.1007/s11657-024-01475-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Summary</h3><p>This study compared denosumab and zoledronic acid for treating osteoporosis in drug-naïve postmenopausal Korean women. Over 3 years, both drugs significantly increased bone mineral density. However, denosumab also improved fat-free mass, suggesting it may be a better initial treatment for osteoporosis with low muscle mass, assuming all other conditions remain constant.</p><h3>Background</h3><p>Denosumab (DMAB) and zoledronic acid (ZOL), which are strong antiresorptive agents, are used to treat osteoporosis in postmenopause. Nonetheless, the data on their comparative efficacy in drug-naïve patients remain limited. Our research compared the therapeutic efficacy of DMAB and ZOL in drug-naïve postmenopausal Korean women with osteoporosis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 120 women were enrolled and equally divided to the DMAB and ZOL groups. The bone density and biochemical parameters of the patients were monitored over 3 years. Furthermore, the changes in fat-free mass (FFM), which comprises muscle mass, were assessed by bioelectric impedance analysis. Baseline characteristics, including age, BMI, and the prevalence of fractures, were similar between the groups at the onset of the study. Serum 25(OH), calcium and, phosphorus levels and baseline bone mineral density (BMD) were also comparable between the groups.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Following 3 years of treatment, both groups exhibited a significant increase in BMD versus the baseline value. In particular, BMD increased by 9.7% and 5.1% at the lumber spine and total hip, respectively, in the DMAB group, versus increases of 7.1% and 4.4%, respectively, in the ZOL group. The increase in FFM was greater in the DMAB group. BMI-adjusted FFM decreased by 1.3% in the ZOL group, versus an increase of 3.6% in the DMAB group.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Conclusively, both DMAB and ZOL are effective antiresorptive agents that improved BMD over 3 years in drug-naïve individuals. Moreover, DMAB might represent a more reliable initial option for patients with osteoporosis accompanied by low muscle mass.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of denosumab and zoledronic acid on postmenopausal osteoporosis, bone density, and fat-free mass\",\"authors\":\"Jeonghoon Ha,&nbsp;Jinyoung Kim,&nbsp;Chaiho Jeong,&nbsp;Jeongmin Lee,&nbsp;Yejee Lim,&nbsp;Ki-Hyun Baek\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11657-024-01475-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Summary</h3><p>This study compared denosumab and zoledronic acid for treating osteoporosis in drug-naïve postmenopausal Korean women. Over 3 years, both drugs significantly increased bone mineral density. However, denosumab also improved fat-free mass, suggesting it may be a better initial treatment for osteoporosis with low muscle mass, assuming all other conditions remain constant.</p><h3>Background</h3><p>Denosumab (DMAB) and zoledronic acid (ZOL), which are strong antiresorptive agents, are used to treat osteoporosis in postmenopause. Nonetheless, the data on their comparative efficacy in drug-naïve patients remain limited. Our research compared the therapeutic efficacy of DMAB and ZOL in drug-naïve postmenopausal Korean women with osteoporosis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 120 women were enrolled and equally divided to the DMAB and ZOL groups. The bone density and biochemical parameters of the patients were monitored over 3 years. Furthermore, the changes in fat-free mass (FFM), which comprises muscle mass, were assessed by bioelectric impedance analysis. Baseline characteristics, including age, BMI, and the prevalence of fractures, were similar between the groups at the onset of the study. Serum 25(OH), calcium and, phosphorus levels and baseline bone mineral density (BMD) were also comparable between the groups.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Following 3 years of treatment, both groups exhibited a significant increase in BMD versus the baseline value. In particular, BMD increased by 9.7% and 5.1% at the lumber spine and total hip, respectively, in the DMAB group, versus increases of 7.1% and 4.4%, respectively, in the ZOL group. The increase in FFM was greater in the DMAB group. BMI-adjusted FFM decreased by 1.3% in the ZOL group, versus an increase of 3.6% in the DMAB group.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Conclusively, both DMAB and ZOL are effective antiresorptive agents that improved BMD over 3 years in drug-naïve individuals. Moreover, DMAB might represent a more reliable initial option for patients with osteoporosis accompanied by low muscle mass.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Osteoporosis\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Osteoporosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-024-01475-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-024-01475-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究比较了denosumab和唑来膦酸治疗drug-naïve绝经后韩国妇女骨质疏松症的疗效。3年后,两种药物均显著增加骨密度。然而,denosumab也改善了无脂量,这表明假设所有其他条件保持不变,它可能是低肌肉量骨质疏松症的更好的初始治疗方法。背景:Denosumab (DMAB)和唑来膦酸(ZOL)是一种强抗吸收药物,用于治疗绝经后骨质疏松症。尽管如此,关于它们在drug-naïve患者中的相对疗效的数据仍然有限。我们的研究比较了DMAB和ZOL治疗drug-naïve韩国绝经后骨质疏松症的疗效。方法:共纳入120名妇女,平均分为DMAB组和ZOL组。随访3年,监测患者骨密度及生化指标。此外,通过生物电阻抗分析评估无脂肪质量(FFM)的变化,其中包括肌肉质量。基线特征,包括年龄、BMI和骨折患病率,在研究开始时各组之间相似。血清25(OH)、钙、磷水平和基线骨密度(BMD)在两组之间也具有可比性。结果:经过3年的治疗,两组患者的骨密度均显著高于基线值。特别是,在DMAB组中,腰椎和全髋关节的骨密度分别增加了9.7%和5.1%,而在ZOL组中分别增加了7.1%和4.4%。DMAB组FFM的增加更大。ZOL组BMI-adjusted FFM下降1.3%,而DMAB组增加3.6%。结论:最终,DMAB和ZOL都是有效的抗吸收药物,在drug-naïve个体中改善骨密度超过3年。此外,对于伴有低肌肉量的骨质疏松患者,DMAB可能是一个更可靠的初始选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of denosumab and zoledronic acid on postmenopausal osteoporosis, bone density, and fat-free mass

Effects of denosumab and zoledronic acid on postmenopausal osteoporosis, bone density, and fat-free mass

Summary

This study compared denosumab and zoledronic acid for treating osteoporosis in drug-naïve postmenopausal Korean women. Over 3 years, both drugs significantly increased bone mineral density. However, denosumab also improved fat-free mass, suggesting it may be a better initial treatment for osteoporosis with low muscle mass, assuming all other conditions remain constant.

Background

Denosumab (DMAB) and zoledronic acid (ZOL), which are strong antiresorptive agents, are used to treat osteoporosis in postmenopause. Nonetheless, the data on their comparative efficacy in drug-naïve patients remain limited. Our research compared the therapeutic efficacy of DMAB and ZOL in drug-naïve postmenopausal Korean women with osteoporosis.

Methods

In total, 120 women were enrolled and equally divided to the DMAB and ZOL groups. The bone density and biochemical parameters of the patients were monitored over 3 years. Furthermore, the changes in fat-free mass (FFM), which comprises muscle mass, were assessed by bioelectric impedance analysis. Baseline characteristics, including age, BMI, and the prevalence of fractures, were similar between the groups at the onset of the study. Serum 25(OH), calcium and, phosphorus levels and baseline bone mineral density (BMD) were also comparable between the groups.

Results

Following 3 years of treatment, both groups exhibited a significant increase in BMD versus the baseline value. In particular, BMD increased by 9.7% and 5.1% at the lumber spine and total hip, respectively, in the DMAB group, versus increases of 7.1% and 4.4%, respectively, in the ZOL group. The increase in FFM was greater in the DMAB group. BMI-adjusted FFM decreased by 1.3% in the ZOL group, versus an increase of 3.6% in the DMAB group.

Conclusions

Conclusively, both DMAB and ZOL are effective antiresorptive agents that improved BMD over 3 years in drug-naïve individuals. Moreover, DMAB might represent a more reliable initial option for patients with osteoporosis accompanied by low muscle mass.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信