Audrey Harkness, Vanessa Morales, Kyle Grealis, Nequiel Reyes, Daniel J. Feaster, Steven Safren, DeAnne Turner, Raymond R. Balise
{"title":"艾滋病毒检测顾问中PrEP和行为健康治疗转诊的实施决定因素。","authors":"Audrey Harkness, Vanessa Morales, Kyle Grealis, Nequiel Reyes, Daniel J. Feaster, Steven Safren, DeAnne Turner, Raymond R. Balise","doi":"10.1007/s10461-025-04620-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), an effective biomedical prevention intervention, is not sufficiently reaching populations experiencing high HIV incidence. Behavioral health (BH) treatment addressing mental health and substance use similarly requires increased reach to HIV-affected populations. HIV testing is an opportunity to refer individuals to PrEP and BH treatment. This study, conducted in Miami-Dade County, FL, a domestic HIV epicenter, aimed to assess (1) self-reported rates at which HIV test counselors refer clients to PrEP and BH treatment, (2) barriers and facilitators to PrEP and BH treatment referral, and (3) the relationship between barriers and facilitators and test counselors’ referral rates. Among 127 HIV test counselors, the average PrEP referral rate was 63.8% (SD = 41.5) of those potentially meeting PrEP indications. Insufficient time was associated with lower PrEP referral (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42–0.99, p = 0.023) and training in PrEP screening was associated with higher rates of PrEP referral (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.98–1.64, p = 0.034). The average BH treatment referral rate was 52.7% (SD = 44.4) of clients who the counselor felt would potentially benefit from treatment. Counselors lacking knowledge of screening (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–0.78, p = 0.004), referral procedures (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23–0.87, p = 0.008), or locations to refer clients (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25–0.86, p = 0.008), as well as those with higher caseloads (OR: 0.998, 95% CI: 0.997–0.999, p < 0.001) were less likely to refer for BH. Training in substance use screening (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.96–1.64, p = 0.046) and referral (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.99–1.66, p = 0.029) were associated with increased BH referral. Implementation strategies are needed to address key barriers to PrEP and BH referrals in HIV testing contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":"29 5","pages":"1492 - 1506"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10461-025-04620-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation Determinants of PrEP and Behavioral Health Treatment Referral among HIV Test Counselors\",\"authors\":\"Audrey Harkness, Vanessa Morales, Kyle Grealis, Nequiel Reyes, Daniel J. Feaster, Steven Safren, DeAnne Turner, Raymond R. Balise\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10461-025-04620-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), an effective biomedical prevention intervention, is not sufficiently reaching populations experiencing high HIV incidence. Behavioral health (BH) treatment addressing mental health and substance use similarly requires increased reach to HIV-affected populations. HIV testing is an opportunity to refer individuals to PrEP and BH treatment. This study, conducted in Miami-Dade County, FL, a domestic HIV epicenter, aimed to assess (1) self-reported rates at which HIV test counselors refer clients to PrEP and BH treatment, (2) barriers and facilitators to PrEP and BH treatment referral, and (3) the relationship between barriers and facilitators and test counselors’ referral rates. Among 127 HIV test counselors, the average PrEP referral rate was 63.8% (SD = 41.5) of those potentially meeting PrEP indications. Insufficient time was associated with lower PrEP referral (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42–0.99, p = 0.023) and training in PrEP screening was associated with higher rates of PrEP referral (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.98–1.64, p = 0.034). The average BH treatment referral rate was 52.7% (SD = 44.4) of clients who the counselor felt would potentially benefit from treatment. Counselors lacking knowledge of screening (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–0.78, p = 0.004), referral procedures (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23–0.87, p = 0.008), or locations to refer clients (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25–0.86, p = 0.008), as well as those with higher caseloads (OR: 0.998, 95% CI: 0.997–0.999, p < 0.001) were less likely to refer for BH. Training in substance use screening (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.96–1.64, p = 0.046) and referral (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.99–1.66, p = 0.029) were associated with increased BH referral. Implementation strategies are needed to address key barriers to PrEP and BH referrals in HIV testing contexts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"1492 - 1506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10461-025-04620-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10461-025-04620-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10461-025-04620-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
暴露前预防(PrEP)是一种有效的生物医学预防干预措施,但并未充分惠及艾滋病毒高发人群。处理精神健康和药物使用问题的行为健康治疗同样需要更多地接触到受艾滋病毒影响的人群。艾滋病毒检测是将个人转介到PrEP和BH治疗的一个机会。本研究在佛罗里达州迈阿密-戴德县(Miami-Dade County, FL)进行,这是一个国内的HIV中心,旨在评估(1)HIV检测咨询师自我报告的转介PrEP和BH治疗的比率,(2)转介PrEP和BH治疗的障碍和辅导员,以及(3)障碍、辅导员和测试咨询师转介率之间的关系。在127名HIV检测咨询师中,那些可能符合PrEP适应症的人的平均PrEP转诊率为63.8% (SD = 41.5)。时间不足与较低的PrEP转诊率相关(OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.99, p = 0.023), PrEP筛查培训与较高的PrEP转诊率相关(OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.98-1.64, p = 0.034)。咨询师认为可能从治疗中获益的患者的平均BH治疗转诊率为52.7% (SD = 44.4)。咨询师缺乏筛查知识(OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2-0.78, p = 0.004),转诊程序知识(OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23-0.87, p = 0.008),或转诊地点知识(OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-0.86, p = 0.008),以及那些案件负荷较高的知识(OR: 0.998, 95% CI: 0.997-0.999, p = 0.008)
Implementation Determinants of PrEP and Behavioral Health Treatment Referral among HIV Test Counselors
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), an effective biomedical prevention intervention, is not sufficiently reaching populations experiencing high HIV incidence. Behavioral health (BH) treatment addressing mental health and substance use similarly requires increased reach to HIV-affected populations. HIV testing is an opportunity to refer individuals to PrEP and BH treatment. This study, conducted in Miami-Dade County, FL, a domestic HIV epicenter, aimed to assess (1) self-reported rates at which HIV test counselors refer clients to PrEP and BH treatment, (2) barriers and facilitators to PrEP and BH treatment referral, and (3) the relationship between barriers and facilitators and test counselors’ referral rates. Among 127 HIV test counselors, the average PrEP referral rate was 63.8% (SD = 41.5) of those potentially meeting PrEP indications. Insufficient time was associated with lower PrEP referral (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42–0.99, p = 0.023) and training in PrEP screening was associated with higher rates of PrEP referral (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.98–1.64, p = 0.034). The average BH treatment referral rate was 52.7% (SD = 44.4) of clients who the counselor felt would potentially benefit from treatment. Counselors lacking knowledge of screening (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–0.78, p = 0.004), referral procedures (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23–0.87, p = 0.008), or locations to refer clients (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25–0.86, p = 0.008), as well as those with higher caseloads (OR: 0.998, 95% CI: 0.997–0.999, p < 0.001) were less likely to refer for BH. Training in substance use screening (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.96–1.64, p = 0.046) and referral (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.99–1.66, p = 0.029) were associated with increased BH referral. Implementation strategies are needed to address key barriers to PrEP and BH referrals in HIV testing contexts.
期刊介绍:
AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76