子宫输卵管MR造影剂的体外优化研究。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1177/02841851241298885
Jin Ding, Huanzhi Ding, Ximing Wang
{"title":"子宫输卵管MR造影剂的体外优化研究。","authors":"Jin Ding, Huanzhi Ding, Ximing Wang","doi":"10.1177/02841851241298885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundGadolinium-iodine mixed contrast agents can significantly improve the visualization of the fallopian tubes in magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography (MR-HSG). However, the mixing ratio of gadolinium-iodine contrast agents has not yet been standardized.PurposeTo explore the optimal mixing ratio of gadolinium-iodine contrast agents suitable for MR-HSG.Material and MethodsA total of 16 mixing ratios of gadolinium and saline mixtures (Gd-NS), gadolinium and iopromide mixtures (Gd-I370), and gadolinium and iodixanol mixtures (Gd-I320) were formulated for an in vitro study. These mixed contrast agents were scanned on 1.5 T and 3.0 T using T1 contrast enhancement sequences. For qualitative assessment, contrast agent imaging quality was graded on a subjective 3-point scale (good, moderate, and poor). For the quantitative evaluation, differences in the signal intensity (SI) of the three contrast agents, as well as the SI variations between 1.5 T and 3.0 T, were compared.ResultsGd-I370 and Gd-I320 exhibited the highest SI and good image at a 1:300 ratio on 1.5 T and a 1:200 ratio on 3.0 T. The difference in the SI among the three contrast agents was not statistically significant at 1.5 T (<i>P </i>> 0.05). At 3.0 T, the comparison between the SIs of Gd-I370 and Gd-I320 was not statistically significant (<i>P </i>> 0.05). The SIs of contrast agents on 3.0 T were higher than those on 1.5 T (<i>P </i>< 0.05).ConclusionA gadolinium-iodine contrast agent with a 1:300 mixing ratio may be more suitable for 1.5 T MR-HSG, while a 1:200 mixing ratio may be more suitable for 3.0 T MR-HSG. Additionally, the contrast agent SI is higher on 3.0 T than on 1.5 T.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"192-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An in vitro study of contrast agent optimization for MR hysterosalpingography.\",\"authors\":\"Jin Ding, Huanzhi Ding, Ximing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02841851241298885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundGadolinium-iodine mixed contrast agents can significantly improve the visualization of the fallopian tubes in magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography (MR-HSG). However, the mixing ratio of gadolinium-iodine contrast agents has not yet been standardized.PurposeTo explore the optimal mixing ratio of gadolinium-iodine contrast agents suitable for MR-HSG.Material and MethodsA total of 16 mixing ratios of gadolinium and saline mixtures (Gd-NS), gadolinium and iopromide mixtures (Gd-I370), and gadolinium and iodixanol mixtures (Gd-I320) were formulated for an in vitro study. These mixed contrast agents were scanned on 1.5 T and 3.0 T using T1 contrast enhancement sequences. For qualitative assessment, contrast agent imaging quality was graded on a subjective 3-point scale (good, moderate, and poor). For the quantitative evaluation, differences in the signal intensity (SI) of the three contrast agents, as well as the SI variations between 1.5 T and 3.0 T, were compared.ResultsGd-I370 and Gd-I320 exhibited the highest SI and good image at a 1:300 ratio on 1.5 T and a 1:200 ratio on 3.0 T. The difference in the SI among the three contrast agents was not statistically significant at 1.5 T (<i>P </i>> 0.05). At 3.0 T, the comparison between the SIs of Gd-I370 and Gd-I320 was not statistically significant (<i>P </i>> 0.05). The SIs of contrast agents on 3.0 T were higher than those on 1.5 T (<i>P </i>< 0.05).ConclusionA gadolinium-iodine contrast agent with a 1:300 mixing ratio may be more suitable for 1.5 T MR-HSG, while a 1:200 mixing ratio may be more suitable for 3.0 T MR-HSG. Additionally, the contrast agent SI is higher on 3.0 T than on 1.5 T.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"192-197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241298885\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241298885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:钆碘混合造影剂可显著改善子宫输卵管磁共振造影术(MR-HSG)中输卵管的显像。然而,钆碘造影剂的混合比例尚未规范。目的:探讨适用于核磁共振造影的钆碘造影剂的最佳配比。材料与方法:配制钆与生理盐水混合物(Gd-NS)、钆与碘丙胺混合物(Gd-I370)、钆与碘二醇混合物(Gd-I320)共16种配比进行体外研究。使用T1增强序列在1.5 T和3.0 T上扫描这些混合造影剂。在定性评估方面,造影剂成像质量按主观3分制(好、中、差)进行分级。为了定量评估,我们比较了三种造影剂的信号强度(SI)差异,以及1.5 T和3.0 T之间的SI变化。结果:Gd-I370和Gd-I320在1.5 T和3.0 T分别以1:300比和1:200比表现出最高的SI和良好的成像。3种造影剂的SI在1.5 T时差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。3.0 T时,Gd-I370与Gd-I320的si比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。对比剂在3.0 T时的si高于1.5 T时(P)。结论:混合比例为1:300的钆碘对比剂适用于1.5 T MR-HSG,混合比例为1:200的钆碘对比剂适用于3.0 T MR-HSG。此外,对比剂SI在3.0 T时高于1.5 T。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An in vitro study of contrast agent optimization for MR hysterosalpingography.

BackgroundGadolinium-iodine mixed contrast agents can significantly improve the visualization of the fallopian tubes in magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography (MR-HSG). However, the mixing ratio of gadolinium-iodine contrast agents has not yet been standardized.PurposeTo explore the optimal mixing ratio of gadolinium-iodine contrast agents suitable for MR-HSG.Material and MethodsA total of 16 mixing ratios of gadolinium and saline mixtures (Gd-NS), gadolinium and iopromide mixtures (Gd-I370), and gadolinium and iodixanol mixtures (Gd-I320) were formulated for an in vitro study. These mixed contrast agents were scanned on 1.5 T and 3.0 T using T1 contrast enhancement sequences. For qualitative assessment, contrast agent imaging quality was graded on a subjective 3-point scale (good, moderate, and poor). For the quantitative evaluation, differences in the signal intensity (SI) of the three contrast agents, as well as the SI variations between 1.5 T and 3.0 T, were compared.ResultsGd-I370 and Gd-I320 exhibited the highest SI and good image at a 1:300 ratio on 1.5 T and a 1:200 ratio on 3.0 T. The difference in the SI among the three contrast agents was not statistically significant at 1.5 T (P > 0.05). At 3.0 T, the comparison between the SIs of Gd-I370 and Gd-I320 was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The SIs of contrast agents on 3.0 T were higher than those on 1.5 T (P < 0.05).ConclusionA gadolinium-iodine contrast agent with a 1:300 mixing ratio may be more suitable for 1.5 T MR-HSG, while a 1:200 mixing ratio may be more suitable for 3.0 T MR-HSG. Additionally, the contrast agent SI is higher on 3.0 T than on 1.5 T.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信