一项调查肝移植可接受性和可行性的非随机试点研究:一项针对急性和慢性肝衰竭的28天家庭肝脏优化方案。

Natalie L.Y. Ngu , Edward Saxby , Thomas Worland , Patricia Anderson , Lisa Stothers , Jo Hunter , Alexander T. Elford , Phil Ha , Imogen Hartley , Andrew Roberts , Dean Seah , George Tambakis , Declan Connoley , Anita Figredo , Dilip Ratnam , Danny Liew , Benjamin Rogers , William Sievert , Sally Bell , Suong Le
{"title":"一项调查肝移植可接受性和可行性的非随机试点研究:一项针对急性和慢性肝衰竭的28天家庭肝脏优化方案。","authors":"Natalie L.Y. Ngu ,&nbsp;Edward Saxby ,&nbsp;Thomas Worland ,&nbsp;Patricia Anderson ,&nbsp;Lisa Stothers ,&nbsp;Jo Hunter ,&nbsp;Alexander T. Elford ,&nbsp;Phil Ha ,&nbsp;Imogen Hartley ,&nbsp;Andrew Roberts ,&nbsp;Dean Seah ,&nbsp;George Tambakis ,&nbsp;Declan Connoley ,&nbsp;Anita Figredo ,&nbsp;Dilip Ratnam ,&nbsp;Danny Liew ,&nbsp;Benjamin Rogers ,&nbsp;William Sievert ,&nbsp;Sally Bell ,&nbsp;Suong Le","doi":"10.1016/j.gastha.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has a 22%–74% 28-day mortality rate and 30%–40% 30-day readmission rate. We investigated the acceptability and feasibility of a multimodal community intervention for ACLF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-arm nonrandomized pilot study of consecutive participants with ACLF was conducted in a tertiary health service. Participants received weekly medical and nursing reviews, dietetics, physiotherapy, pharmacy, social work, addiction medicine, and neuropsychiatry, where indicated. A digital platform included remote weight monitoring and online surveys. The primary outcome was acceptability/feasibility. Secondary outcomes included safety, mortality, readmission, liver disease severity, and costs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-nine patients were enrolled with median age 51 years (interquartile range (IQR): 45–59); majority alcohol etiology (74%),and median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium score 16 (IQR: 12–21). LivR Well was acceptable with low attrition (8 of 59), adherence to the program including home visits (mean 8.4 ± 4.2) and consultations (mean 2.4 ± 1.5) per patient. This was supported by positive feedback and themes identified through a qualitative subanalysis. Feasibility was demonstrated by recruitment rate of 4.94 patients/month and 86% completion. Mortality was lower than expected at 3%, 30-day readmission rate was 15%, and median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium score reduced to 15 (<em>P</em> = .01). Median 6-month costs reduced from $30,454 (IQR: $21,953–$65,657) to $17,657 ($4249–$42,876) (<em>P</em> = .009). The total 6-month health-care cost was $1,868,859 (95% confidence interval 1,081,821–2,655,897) compared to $2,518,227 (95% confidence interval 1,959,610–3,076,844).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LivR Well was acceptable, feasible, and safe with low short-term mortality and readmission rates. Health-care costs were reduced by 26% driven by a 40% reduction in 30-day readmission. Further evaluation includes a randomized controlled trial of LivR Well compared to standard care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73130,"journal":{"name":"Gastro hep advances","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Nonrandomized Pilot Study to Investigate the Acceptability and Feasibility of LivR Well: A Multifaceted 28-Day Home-Based Liver Optimization Program for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure\",\"authors\":\"Natalie L.Y. Ngu ,&nbsp;Edward Saxby ,&nbsp;Thomas Worland ,&nbsp;Patricia Anderson ,&nbsp;Lisa Stothers ,&nbsp;Jo Hunter ,&nbsp;Alexander T. Elford ,&nbsp;Phil Ha ,&nbsp;Imogen Hartley ,&nbsp;Andrew Roberts ,&nbsp;Dean Seah ,&nbsp;George Tambakis ,&nbsp;Declan Connoley ,&nbsp;Anita Figredo ,&nbsp;Dilip Ratnam ,&nbsp;Danny Liew ,&nbsp;Benjamin Rogers ,&nbsp;William Sievert ,&nbsp;Sally Bell ,&nbsp;Suong Le\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gastha.2024.10.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has a 22%–74% 28-day mortality rate and 30%–40% 30-day readmission rate. We investigated the acceptability and feasibility of a multimodal community intervention for ACLF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-arm nonrandomized pilot study of consecutive participants with ACLF was conducted in a tertiary health service. Participants received weekly medical and nursing reviews, dietetics, physiotherapy, pharmacy, social work, addiction medicine, and neuropsychiatry, where indicated. A digital platform included remote weight monitoring and online surveys. The primary outcome was acceptability/feasibility. Secondary outcomes included safety, mortality, readmission, liver disease severity, and costs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-nine patients were enrolled with median age 51 years (interquartile range (IQR): 45–59); majority alcohol etiology (74%),and median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium score 16 (IQR: 12–21). LivR Well was acceptable with low attrition (8 of 59), adherence to the program including home visits (mean 8.4 ± 4.2) and consultations (mean 2.4 ± 1.5) per patient. This was supported by positive feedback and themes identified through a qualitative subanalysis. Feasibility was demonstrated by recruitment rate of 4.94 patients/month and 86% completion. Mortality was lower than expected at 3%, 30-day readmission rate was 15%, and median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium score reduced to 15 (<em>P</em> = .01). Median 6-month costs reduced from $30,454 (IQR: $21,953–$65,657) to $17,657 ($4249–$42,876) (<em>P</em> = .009). The total 6-month health-care cost was $1,868,859 (95% confidence interval 1,081,821–2,655,897) compared to $2,518,227 (95% confidence interval 1,959,610–3,076,844).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LivR Well was acceptable, feasible, and safe with low short-term mortality and readmission rates. Health-care costs were reduced by 26% driven by a 40% reduction in 30-day readmission. Further evaluation includes a randomized controlled trial of LivR Well compared to standard care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastro hep advances\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773469/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastro hep advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772572324001626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastro hep advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772572324001626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:急性慢性肝衰竭(ACLF) 28天死亡率为22%-74%,30天再入院率为30%-40%。我们调查了ACLF多模式社区干预的可接受性和可行性。方法:在三级卫生服务机构进行了一项单臂非随机试点研究,连续参与者患有ACLF。参与者每周接受医疗和护理评估、营养学、物理疗法、药学、社会工作、成瘾药物和神经精神病学等方面的评估。一个数字平台包括远程体重监测和在线调查。主要结果是可接受性/可行性。次要结局包括安全性、死亡率、再入院、肝脏疾病严重程度和费用。结果:入组59例患者,中位年龄51岁(四分位间距(IQR): 45-59);酒精是主要病因(74%),终末期肝病模型钠评分中位数为16 (IQR: 12-21)。LivR Well是可接受的,减员率低(59人中有8人),依从性包括每位患者的家访(平均8.4±4.2)和咨询(平均2.4±1.5)。这得到了积极反馈和通过定性子分析确定的主题的支持。招募率4.94例/月,完成率86%,证明了该方法的可行性。死亡率低于预期,为3%,30天再入院率为15%,终末期肝病模型钠评分中位数降至15 (P = 0.01)。6个月的成本中位数从30,454美元(IQR: 21,953- 65,657美元)降至17,657美元(4249- 42,876美元)(P = 0.009)。6个月的保健费用总额为1 868 859美元(95%置信区间为1 81,821-2 655,897),而2 518,227美元(95%置信区间为1 959,610-3 076,844)。结论:LivR Well是可接受的、可行的、安全的,短期死亡率和再入院率低。由于30天再入院时间减少了40%,医疗保健费用减少了26%。进一步的评估包括LivR Well与标准治疗的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Nonrandomized Pilot Study to Investigate the Acceptability and Feasibility of LivR Well: A Multifaceted 28-Day Home-Based Liver Optimization Program for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Background and Aims

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has a 22%–74% 28-day mortality rate and 30%–40% 30-day readmission rate. We investigated the acceptability and feasibility of a multimodal community intervention for ACLF.

Methods

A single-arm nonrandomized pilot study of consecutive participants with ACLF was conducted in a tertiary health service. Participants received weekly medical and nursing reviews, dietetics, physiotherapy, pharmacy, social work, addiction medicine, and neuropsychiatry, where indicated. A digital platform included remote weight monitoring and online surveys. The primary outcome was acceptability/feasibility. Secondary outcomes included safety, mortality, readmission, liver disease severity, and costs.

Results

Fifty-nine patients were enrolled with median age 51 years (interquartile range (IQR): 45–59); majority alcohol etiology (74%),and median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium score 16 (IQR: 12–21). LivR Well was acceptable with low attrition (8 of 59), adherence to the program including home visits (mean 8.4 ± 4.2) and consultations (mean 2.4 ± 1.5) per patient. This was supported by positive feedback and themes identified through a qualitative subanalysis. Feasibility was demonstrated by recruitment rate of 4.94 patients/month and 86% completion. Mortality was lower than expected at 3%, 30-day readmission rate was 15%, and median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium score reduced to 15 (P = .01). Median 6-month costs reduced from $30,454 (IQR: $21,953–$65,657) to $17,657 ($4249–$42,876) (P = .009). The total 6-month health-care cost was $1,868,859 (95% confidence interval 1,081,821–2,655,897) compared to $2,518,227 (95% confidence interval 1,959,610–3,076,844).

Conclusion

LivR Well was acceptable, feasible, and safe with low short-term mortality and readmission rates. Health-care costs were reduced by 26% driven by a 40% reduction in 30-day readmission. Further evaluation includes a randomized controlled trial of LivR Well compared to standard care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastro hep advances
Gastro hep advances Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信