阅读过程中的老化和词汇预测:来自眼球运动和注视相关电位的证据。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Ascensión Pagán, Federica Degno, Sara V. Milledge, Richard D. Kirkden, Sarah J. White, Simon P. Liversedge, Kevin B. Paterson
{"title":"阅读过程中的老化和词汇预测:来自眼球运动和注视相关电位的证据。","authors":"Ascensión Pagán,&nbsp;Federica Degno,&nbsp;Sara V. Milledge,&nbsp;Richard D. Kirkden,&nbsp;Sarah J. White,&nbsp;Simon P. Liversedge,&nbsp;Kevin B. Paterson","doi":"10.3758/s13414-024-02981-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of context to facilitate the processing of words is recognized as a hallmark of skilled reading. This capability is also hypothesized to change with older age because of cognitive changes across the lifespan. However, research investigating this issue using eye movements or event-related potentials (ERPs) has produced conflicting findings. Specifically, whereas eye-movement studies report larger context effects for older than younger adults, ERP findings suggest that context effects are diminished or delayed for older readers. Crucially, these contrary findings may reflect methodological differences, including use of unnatural sentence displays in ERP research. To address these limitations, we used a coregistration technique to record eye movements (EMs) and fixation-related potentials (FRPs) simultaneously while 44 young adults (18–30 years) and 30 older adults (65+ years) read sentences containing a target word that was strongly or weakly predicted by prior context. Eye-movement analyses were conducted over all data (full EM dataset) and only data matching FRPs. FRPs were analysed to capture early and later components 70–900 ms following fixation-onset on target words. Both eye-movement datasets and early FRPs showed main effects of age group and context, while the full EM dataset and later FRPs revealed larger context effects for older adults. We argue that, by using coregistration methods to address limitations of earlier ERP research, our experiment provides compelling complementary evidence from eye movements and FRPs that older adults rely more on context to integrate words during reading.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"87 1","pages":"50 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-024-02981-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aging and word predictability during reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials\",\"authors\":\"Ascensión Pagán,&nbsp;Federica Degno,&nbsp;Sara V. Milledge,&nbsp;Richard D. Kirkden,&nbsp;Sarah J. White,&nbsp;Simon P. Liversedge,&nbsp;Kevin B. Paterson\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13414-024-02981-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The use of context to facilitate the processing of words is recognized as a hallmark of skilled reading. This capability is also hypothesized to change with older age because of cognitive changes across the lifespan. However, research investigating this issue using eye movements or event-related potentials (ERPs) has produced conflicting findings. Specifically, whereas eye-movement studies report larger context effects for older than younger adults, ERP findings suggest that context effects are diminished or delayed for older readers. Crucially, these contrary findings may reflect methodological differences, including use of unnatural sentence displays in ERP research. To address these limitations, we used a coregistration technique to record eye movements (EMs) and fixation-related potentials (FRPs) simultaneously while 44 young adults (18–30 years) and 30 older adults (65+ years) read sentences containing a target word that was strongly or weakly predicted by prior context. Eye-movement analyses were conducted over all data (full EM dataset) and only data matching FRPs. FRPs were analysed to capture early and later components 70–900 ms following fixation-onset on target words. Both eye-movement datasets and early FRPs showed main effects of age group and context, while the full EM dataset and later FRPs revealed larger context effects for older adults. We argue that, by using coregistration methods to address limitations of earlier ERP research, our experiment provides compelling complementary evidence from eye movements and FRPs that older adults rely more on context to integrate words during reading.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"50 - 75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-024-02981-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-024-02981-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-024-02981-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运用语境来促进词汇的加工被认为是熟练阅读的标志。这种能力也被假设随着年龄的增长而改变,因为整个生命周期的认知变化。然而,使用眼动或事件相关电位(erp)来调查这个问题的研究产生了相互矛盾的结果。具体来说,虽然眼动研究报告了老年人比年轻人更大的语境效应,但ERP研究结果表明,老年读者的语境效应减弱或延迟。至关重要的是,这些相反的发现可能反映了方法上的差异,包括在ERP研究中使用非自然句子显示。为了解决这些限制,我们使用了一种共配准技术,在44名年轻人(18-30岁)和30名老年人(65岁以上)阅读含有目标词的句子时,同时记录眼球运动(EMs)和注视相关电位(FRPs),这些句子由先前的上下文或强或弱地预测。对所有数据(完整的EM数据集)进行眼动分析,仅对匹配frp的数据进行眼动分析。在注视开始后的70-900毫秒内,对FRPs进行了分析,以捕捉目标单词的早期和后期成分。眼动数据集和早期FRPs都显示了年龄组和环境的主要影响,而完整的EM数据集和后来的FRPs显示了老年人更大的环境影响。我们认为,通过使用共注册方法来解决早期ERP研究的局限性,我们的实验提供了来自眼动和frp的令人信服的补充证据,即老年人在阅读过程中更多地依赖上下文来整合单词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aging and word predictability during reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials

The use of context to facilitate the processing of words is recognized as a hallmark of skilled reading. This capability is also hypothesized to change with older age because of cognitive changes across the lifespan. However, research investigating this issue using eye movements or event-related potentials (ERPs) has produced conflicting findings. Specifically, whereas eye-movement studies report larger context effects for older than younger adults, ERP findings suggest that context effects are diminished or delayed for older readers. Crucially, these contrary findings may reflect methodological differences, including use of unnatural sentence displays in ERP research. To address these limitations, we used a coregistration technique to record eye movements (EMs) and fixation-related potentials (FRPs) simultaneously while 44 young adults (18–30 years) and 30 older adults (65+ years) read sentences containing a target word that was strongly or weakly predicted by prior context. Eye-movement analyses were conducted over all data (full EM dataset) and only data matching FRPs. FRPs were analysed to capture early and later components 70–900 ms following fixation-onset on target words. Both eye-movement datasets and early FRPs showed main effects of age group and context, while the full EM dataset and later FRPs revealed larger context effects for older adults. We argue that, by using coregistration methods to address limitations of earlier ERP research, our experiment provides compelling complementary evidence from eye movements and FRPs that older adults rely more on context to integrate words during reading.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信