高血压患者脉压指数与死亡率的关系:NHANES 1999-2018的结果

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Hongjin Jin, Shusheng Fang, Shuo An, Yanchun Ding
{"title":"高血压患者脉压指数与死亡率的关系:NHANES 1999-2018的结果","authors":"Hongjin Jin,&nbsp;Shusheng Fang,&nbsp;Shuo An,&nbsp;Yanchun Ding","doi":"10.1111/jch.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vascular compliance is an important predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Pulse pressure index (PPI) is a reliable indicator for evaluating vascular compliance. However, the association between PPI, all-cause mortality (ACM), and cardiovascular mortality (CVM) in patients with hypertension is still unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of PPI with ACM and CVM in patients with hypertension. Kaplan–Meier survival curves, Cox proportional hazards regression models, restricted cubic splines, and subgroup and interaction analyses were used to investigate the association of PPI with ACM and CVM. U-shaped associations were observed between PPI and both ACM and CVM, and the inflection points for ACM and CVM were at PPI values of 0.327 and 0.363, respectively. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that PPI showed good predictive value for both ACM and CVM occurrence at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, and its predictive value was higher than PP for ACM and CVM at 5 and 10 years. These results showed that PPI can be used to identify patients with hypertension who are at a high risk of mortality and can guide more aggressive anti-hypertensive treatment strategies. Moreover, these findings demonstrate that PPI is a superior vascular compliance indicator than PP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Pulse Prssure Index With Mortality in Patients With Hypertension: Results From NHANES 1999–2018\",\"authors\":\"Hongjin Jin,&nbsp;Shusheng Fang,&nbsp;Shuo An,&nbsp;Yanchun Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.70004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Vascular compliance is an important predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Pulse pressure index (PPI) is a reliable indicator for evaluating vascular compliance. However, the association between PPI, all-cause mortality (ACM), and cardiovascular mortality (CVM) in patients with hypertension is still unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of PPI with ACM and CVM in patients with hypertension. Kaplan–Meier survival curves, Cox proportional hazards regression models, restricted cubic splines, and subgroup and interaction analyses were used to investigate the association of PPI with ACM and CVM. U-shaped associations were observed between PPI and both ACM and CVM, and the inflection points for ACM and CVM were at PPI values of 0.327 and 0.363, respectively. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that PPI showed good predictive value for both ACM and CVM occurrence at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, and its predictive value was higher than PP for ACM and CVM at 5 and 10 years. These results showed that PPI can be used to identify patients with hypertension who are at a high risk of mortality and can guide more aggressive anti-hypertensive treatment strategies. Moreover, these findings demonstrate that PPI is a superior vascular compliance indicator than PP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775918/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血管顺应性是心血管疾病和死亡率的重要预测指标。脉压指数(PPI)是评价血管顺应性的可靠指标。然而,高血压患者PPI、全因死亡率(ACM)和心血管死亡率(CVM)之间的关系尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们旨在探讨PPI与高血压患者ACM和CVM的关系。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线、Cox比例风险回归模型、受限三次样条、亚组和相互作用分析来研究PPI与ACM和CVM的关系。PPI与ACM和CVM呈u型相关,ACM和CVM的拐点分别在PPI值0.327和0.363处。随时间变化的受试者工作特征曲线显示,PPI在1、3、5和10年对ACM和CVM的发生均有较好的预测价值,且在5和10年对ACM和CVM的预测价值高于PP。这些结果表明,PPI可用于识别死亡风险高的高血压患者,并可指导更积极的降压治疗策略。此外,这些发现表明PPI是比PP更好的血管顺应性指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association of Pulse Prssure Index With Mortality in Patients With Hypertension: Results From NHANES 1999–2018

Association of Pulse Prssure Index With Mortality in Patients With Hypertension: Results From NHANES 1999–2018

Vascular compliance is an important predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Pulse pressure index (PPI) is a reliable indicator for evaluating vascular compliance. However, the association between PPI, all-cause mortality (ACM), and cardiovascular mortality (CVM) in patients with hypertension is still unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of PPI with ACM and CVM in patients with hypertension. Kaplan–Meier survival curves, Cox proportional hazards regression models, restricted cubic splines, and subgroup and interaction analyses were used to investigate the association of PPI with ACM and CVM. U-shaped associations were observed between PPI and both ACM and CVM, and the inflection points for ACM and CVM were at PPI values of 0.327 and 0.363, respectively. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that PPI showed good predictive value for both ACM and CVM occurrence at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, and its predictive value was higher than PP for ACM and CVM at 5 and 10 years. These results showed that PPI can be used to identify patients with hypertension who are at a high risk of mortality and can guide more aggressive anti-hypertensive treatment strategies. Moreover, these findings demonstrate that PPI is a superior vascular compliance indicator than PP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信