“分组化”:一种视觉空间和算术现象。

Q1 Social Sciences
Open Mind Pub Date : 2025-01-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00181
Paula A Maldonado Moscoso, Giovanni Anobile, Giuseppe Maduli, Roberto Arrighi, Elisa Castaldi
{"title":"“分组化”:一种视觉空间和算术现象。","authors":"Paula A Maldonado Moscoso, Giovanni Anobile, Giuseppe Maduli, Roberto Arrighi, Elisa Castaldi","doi":"10.1162/opmi_a_00181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When objects are grouped in space, humans can estimate numerosity more precisely than when they are randomly scattered. This phenomenon, called groupitizing, is thought to arise from the interplay of two components: the subitizing system which identifies both the number of subgroups and of items within each group, and the possibility to perform basic arithmetic operations on the subitized groups. Here we directly investigate the relative role of these two components in groupitizing via an interference (dual task) paradigm. Participants were required to estimate numerosities of grouped and ungrouped arrays while their attentional resources were fully available (single task) or while performing concurrent tasks loading auditory or visuo-spatial attention (both known to interfere with the subitizing process) as well as while performing arithmetic calculation. The attentional cost of performing any concurrent task was overall higher for grouped than ungrouped stimuli, supporting the idea that groupitizing relies on the recruitment of more than one attention-dependent mechanism. However, depriving visuo-spatial attention and preventing participants from performing calculations caused the strongest decrement in sensory precision for grouped numerosities indicating that these attentional components play a major role in groupitizing. These results are in line with the existence of an estimation mechanism that might operate across all numerical ranges, supplemented by attentional mechanisms (subitizing). This study shows that this attentional-demanding mechanism can be activated also when processing numerosities outside of the subitizing regime (<i>n</i> > 4), provided that grouping cues are available and, in concert with calculation abilities, gives rise to the groupitizing phenomenon.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"121-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Groupitizing\\\": A Visuo-Spatial and Arithmetic Phenomenon.\",\"authors\":\"Paula A Maldonado Moscoso, Giovanni Anobile, Giuseppe Maduli, Roberto Arrighi, Elisa Castaldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/opmi_a_00181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When objects are grouped in space, humans can estimate numerosity more precisely than when they are randomly scattered. This phenomenon, called groupitizing, is thought to arise from the interplay of two components: the subitizing system which identifies both the number of subgroups and of items within each group, and the possibility to perform basic arithmetic operations on the subitized groups. Here we directly investigate the relative role of these two components in groupitizing via an interference (dual task) paradigm. Participants were required to estimate numerosities of grouped and ungrouped arrays while their attentional resources were fully available (single task) or while performing concurrent tasks loading auditory or visuo-spatial attention (both known to interfere with the subitizing process) as well as while performing arithmetic calculation. The attentional cost of performing any concurrent task was overall higher for grouped than ungrouped stimuli, supporting the idea that groupitizing relies on the recruitment of more than one attention-dependent mechanism. However, depriving visuo-spatial attention and preventing participants from performing calculations caused the strongest decrement in sensory precision for grouped numerosities indicating that these attentional components play a major role in groupitizing. These results are in line with the existence of an estimation mechanism that might operate across all numerical ranges, supplemented by attentional mechanisms (subitizing). This study shows that this attentional-demanding mechanism can be activated also when processing numerosities outside of the subitizing regime (<i>n</i> > 4), provided that grouping cues are available and, in concert with calculation abilities, gives rise to the groupitizing phenomenon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Mind\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"121-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774540/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Mind\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当物体在空间中分组时,人类可以比它们随机分散时更精确地估计数量。这种现象被称为分组,被认为是由两个组成部分的相互作用产生的:确定子组和每个组内项目数量的分组系统,以及对分组组执行基本算术运算的可能性。在这里,我们通过干扰(双任务)范式直接研究这两个组件在分组中的相对作用。参与者被要求估计分组和未分组数组的数量,而他们的注意力资源是完全可用的(单一任务),或同时执行加载听觉或视觉空间注意力的任务(两者都干扰细分过程),以及在进行算术计算。执行任何并发任务的注意成本总体上高于未分组刺激,这支持了分组依赖于多个注意依赖机制的观点。然而,剥夺视觉空间注意力和阻止参与者进行计算会导致对分组数字的感官精度的最大下降,这表明这些注意力成分在分组中起着主要作用。这些结果与可能在所有数值范围内操作的估计机制的存在一致,并辅以注意机制(subbizing)。本研究表明,如果分组提示是可用的,并且与计算能力相一致,那么在处理分组机制之外的数字时,这种注意要求机制也可以被激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Groupitizing": A Visuo-Spatial and Arithmetic Phenomenon.

When objects are grouped in space, humans can estimate numerosity more precisely than when they are randomly scattered. This phenomenon, called groupitizing, is thought to arise from the interplay of two components: the subitizing system which identifies both the number of subgroups and of items within each group, and the possibility to perform basic arithmetic operations on the subitized groups. Here we directly investigate the relative role of these two components in groupitizing via an interference (dual task) paradigm. Participants were required to estimate numerosities of grouped and ungrouped arrays while their attentional resources were fully available (single task) or while performing concurrent tasks loading auditory or visuo-spatial attention (both known to interfere with the subitizing process) as well as while performing arithmetic calculation. The attentional cost of performing any concurrent task was overall higher for grouped than ungrouped stimuli, supporting the idea that groupitizing relies on the recruitment of more than one attention-dependent mechanism. However, depriving visuo-spatial attention and preventing participants from performing calculations caused the strongest decrement in sensory precision for grouped numerosities indicating that these attentional components play a major role in groupitizing. These results are in line with the existence of an estimation mechanism that might operate across all numerical ranges, supplemented by attentional mechanisms (subitizing). This study shows that this attentional-demanding mechanism can be activated also when processing numerosities outside of the subitizing regime (n > 4), provided that grouping cues are available and, in concert with calculation abilities, gives rise to the groupitizing phenomenon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信