{"title":"双氧水高分辨率直接磁共振造影诊断肛肠瘘的初步回顾性研究。","authors":"Can-Can Chang, Long-Hu Qiao, Zhen-Qi Zhang, Xiao Tian, Yu Zhang, Wen-Wen Cheng, Xia Wang, Qing Yang","doi":"10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.101221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fistula-in-ano is an abnormal tunnel formation linking the anal canal with the perineum and perianal skin. Multiple imagining methods are available to evaluate it, among which magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most advanced noninvasive preoperative method. However, it is limited in its visualization function.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the use of intraluminal MRI for perianal fistulas <i>via</i> a novel direct MRI fistulography method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We mixed 3% hydrogen peroxide (HP) with gadolinium for HPMRI fistulography, retrospectively analyzing 60 cases of complex/recurrent fistula-in-ano using physical examination, trans-perineal ultrasonography (TPUS), low-spatial-resolution MRI, and high-resolution direct HPMRI fistulography. We assessed detection rates of fistula tracks, internal openings, their relationship with anal sphincters, and perianal abscesses using statistical analyses, including interobserver agreement (Kappa statistic), and compared results with intraoperative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgical confirmation in 60 cases showed that high-resolution direct HPMRI fistulography provided superior detection rates for internal openings (153) and fistula tracks (162) compared to physical exams, TPUS, and low-spatial-resolution MRI (<i>Z</i> > 5.7, <i>P</i> < 0.05). The effectiveness of physical examination and TPUS was also inferior to that of our method for detecting perianal abscesses (54) (<i>Z</i> = 6.773, 3.694, <i>P</i> < 0.05), whereas that of low-spatial-resolution MRI was not significantly different (<i>Z</i> = 1.851, <i>P</i> = 0.06). High-resolution direct HPMRI fistulography also achieved the highest interobserver agreement (Kappa: 0.89, 0.85, and 0.80), while low-spatial-resolution MRI showed moderate agreement (Kappa: 0.78, 0.74, and 0.69). TPUS and physical examination had lower agreement (Kappa range: 0.33-0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-resolution direct HPMRI fistulography enhances the visualization of recurrent and complex fistula-in-ano, including branched fistulas, allowing for precise planning and improved surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23819,"journal":{"name":"World journal of radiology","volume":"17 1","pages":"101221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-resolution direct magnetic resonance imaging fistulography with hydrogen peroxide for diagnosing anorectal fistula: A preliminary retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Can-Can Chang, Long-Hu Qiao, Zhen-Qi Zhang, Xiao Tian, Yu Zhang, Wen-Wen Cheng, Xia Wang, Qing Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.101221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fistula-in-ano is an abnormal tunnel formation linking the anal canal with the perineum and perianal skin. Multiple imagining methods are available to evaluate it, among which magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most advanced noninvasive preoperative method. However, it is limited in its visualization function.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the use of intraluminal MRI for perianal fistulas <i>via</i> a novel direct MRI fistulography method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We mixed 3% hydrogen peroxide (HP) with gadolinium for HPMRI fistulography, retrospectively analyzing 60 cases of complex/recurrent fistula-in-ano using physical examination, trans-perineal ultrasonography (TPUS), low-spatial-resolution MRI, and high-resolution direct HPMRI fistulography. We assessed detection rates of fistula tracks, internal openings, their relationship with anal sphincters, and perianal abscesses using statistical analyses, including interobserver agreement (Kappa statistic), and compared results with intraoperative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgical confirmation in 60 cases showed that high-resolution direct HPMRI fistulography provided superior detection rates for internal openings (153) and fistula tracks (162) compared to physical exams, TPUS, and low-spatial-resolution MRI (<i>Z</i> > 5.7, <i>P</i> < 0.05). The effectiveness of physical examination and TPUS was also inferior to that of our method for detecting perianal abscesses (54) (<i>Z</i> = 6.773, 3.694, <i>P</i> < 0.05), whereas that of low-spatial-resolution MRI was not significantly different (<i>Z</i> = 1.851, <i>P</i> = 0.06). High-resolution direct HPMRI fistulography also achieved the highest interobserver agreement (Kappa: 0.89, 0.85, and 0.80), while low-spatial-resolution MRI showed moderate agreement (Kappa: 0.78, 0.74, and 0.69). TPUS and physical examination had lower agreement (Kappa range: 0.33-0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-resolution direct HPMRI fistulography enhances the visualization of recurrent and complex fistula-in-ano, including branched fistulas, allowing for precise planning and improved surgical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of radiology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"101221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755908/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.101221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.101221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肛瘘是一种连接肛管与会阴和肛周皮肤的异常隧道。有多种影像学方法对其进行评估,其中磁共振成像(MRI)是最先进的无创术前方法。然而,它的可视化功能是有限的。目的:通过一种新型的直接MRI造瘘方法,探讨腔内MRI在肛瘘诊断中的应用。方法:将3%过氧化氢(HP)与钆混合进行HPMRI瘘管造影,通过体格检查、经会阴超声检查(tpu)、低空间分辨率MRI和高分辨率直接HPMRI瘘管造影对60例复杂/复发性瘘管进行回顾性分析。我们使用统计分析(包括观察者间一致性(Kappa统计))评估瘘道、内开口、它们与肛门括约肌和肛周脓肿的关系的检出率,并将结果与术中发现进行比较。结果:60例手术证实,高分辨率直接HPMRI造瘘术对内瘘口(153例)和瘘道(162例)的检出率优于体检、tpu和低空间分辨率MRI (Z > 5.7, P < 0.05)。体格检查和tpu检测肛周脓肿的有效性也不如我们的方法(54)(Z = 6.773, 3.694, P < 0.05),而低空间分辨率MRI检测肛周脓肿的有效性差异无统计学意义(Z = 1.851, P = 0.06)。高分辨率直接HPMRI造影也获得了最高的观察者间一致性(Kappa: 0.89, 0.85和0.80),而低空间分辨率MRI显示中度一致性(Kappa: 0.78, 0.74和0.69)。tpu与体检的一致性较低(Kappa范围:0.33 ~ 0.63)。结论:高分辨率直接HPMRI瘘管造影增强了复发性和复杂瘘管的可视化,包括分支瘘管,允许精确计划和改善手术效果。
High-resolution direct magnetic resonance imaging fistulography with hydrogen peroxide for diagnosing anorectal fistula: A preliminary retrospective study.
Background: Fistula-in-ano is an abnormal tunnel formation linking the anal canal with the perineum and perianal skin. Multiple imagining methods are available to evaluate it, among which magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most advanced noninvasive preoperative method. However, it is limited in its visualization function.
Aim: To investigate the use of intraluminal MRI for perianal fistulas via a novel direct MRI fistulography method.
Methods: We mixed 3% hydrogen peroxide (HP) with gadolinium for HPMRI fistulography, retrospectively analyzing 60 cases of complex/recurrent fistula-in-ano using physical examination, trans-perineal ultrasonography (TPUS), low-spatial-resolution MRI, and high-resolution direct HPMRI fistulography. We assessed detection rates of fistula tracks, internal openings, their relationship with anal sphincters, and perianal abscesses using statistical analyses, including interobserver agreement (Kappa statistic), and compared results with intraoperative findings.
Results: Surgical confirmation in 60 cases showed that high-resolution direct HPMRI fistulography provided superior detection rates for internal openings (153) and fistula tracks (162) compared to physical exams, TPUS, and low-spatial-resolution MRI (Z > 5.7, P < 0.05). The effectiveness of physical examination and TPUS was also inferior to that of our method for detecting perianal abscesses (54) (Z = 6.773, 3.694, P < 0.05), whereas that of low-spatial-resolution MRI was not significantly different (Z = 1.851, P = 0.06). High-resolution direct HPMRI fistulography also achieved the highest interobserver agreement (Kappa: 0.89, 0.85, and 0.80), while low-spatial-resolution MRI showed moderate agreement (Kappa: 0.78, 0.74, and 0.69). TPUS and physical examination had lower agreement (Kappa range: 0.33-0.63).
Conclusion: High-resolution direct HPMRI fistulography enhances the visualization of recurrent and complex fistula-in-ano, including branched fistulas, allowing for precise planning and improved surgical outcomes.