一种用于检测偶然椎体压缩性骨折的深度学习工具的验证。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Michelle Dai, Bryan-Clement Tiu, Jacob Schlossman, Angela Ayobi, Charlotte Castineira, Julie Kiewsky, Christophe Avare, Yasmina Chaibi, Peter Chang, Daniel Chow, Jennifer E Soun
{"title":"一种用于检测偶然椎体压缩性骨折的深度学习工具的验证。","authors":"Michelle Dai, Bryan-Clement Tiu, Jacob Schlossman, Angela Ayobi, Charlotte Castineira, Julie Kiewsky, Christophe Avare, Yasmina Chaibi, Peter Chang, Daniel Chow, Jennifer E Soun","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the performance of a deep learning-based vertebral compression fracture (VCF) detection tool in patients with incidental VCF. The purpose of this study was to validate this tool across multiple sites and multiple vendors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, multicenter, multinational blinded study using anonymized chest and abdominal CT scans performed for indications other than VCF in patients ≥50 years old. Images were obtained from 2 teleradiology companies in France and United States and were processed by CINA-VCF v1.0, a deep learning algorithm designed for VCF detection. Ground truth was established by majority consensus across 3 board-certified radiologists. Overall performance of CINA-VCF was evaluated, as well as subset analyses based on imaging acquisition parameters, baseline patient characteristics, and VCF severity. A subgroup was also analyzed and compared with available clinical radiology reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred seventy-four CT scans were included in this study, comprising 166 (35.0%) positive and 308 (65.0%) negative VCF cases. CINA-VCF demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), accuracy of 93.7% (95% CI: 91.1%-95.7%), sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI: 90.7%-97.9%), and specificity of 92.9% (95% CI: 89.4%-96.5%). Subset analysis based on VCF severity resulted in a specificity of 94.2% (95% CI: 90.9%-96.6%) for grade 0 negative cases and a specificity of 64.3% (95% CI: 35.1%-87.2%) for grade 1 negative cases. For grades 2 and 3 positive cases, sensitivity was 89.7% (95% CI: 79.9%-95.8%) and 99.0% (95% CI: 94.4%-100.0%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CINA-VCF successfully detected incidental VCF and even outperformed clinical reports. The performance was consistent among all subgroups analyzed. Limitations of the tool included various confounding pathologies such as Schmorl's nodes and borderline cases. Despite these limitations, this study validates the applicability and generalizability of the tool in the clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":"669-674"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Deep Learning Tool for Detection of Incidental Vertebral Compression Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Dai, Bryan-Clement Tiu, Jacob Schlossman, Angela Ayobi, Charlotte Castineira, Julie Kiewsky, Christophe Avare, Yasmina Chaibi, Peter Chang, Daniel Chow, Jennifer E Soun\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the performance of a deep learning-based vertebral compression fracture (VCF) detection tool in patients with incidental VCF. The purpose of this study was to validate this tool across multiple sites and multiple vendors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, multicenter, multinational blinded study using anonymized chest and abdominal CT scans performed for indications other than VCF in patients ≥50 years old. Images were obtained from 2 teleradiology companies in France and United States and were processed by CINA-VCF v1.0, a deep learning algorithm designed for VCF detection. Ground truth was established by majority consensus across 3 board-certified radiologists. Overall performance of CINA-VCF was evaluated, as well as subset analyses based on imaging acquisition parameters, baseline patient characteristics, and VCF severity. A subgroup was also analyzed and compared with available clinical radiology reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred seventy-four CT scans were included in this study, comprising 166 (35.0%) positive and 308 (65.0%) negative VCF cases. CINA-VCF demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), accuracy of 93.7% (95% CI: 91.1%-95.7%), sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI: 90.7%-97.9%), and specificity of 92.9% (95% CI: 89.4%-96.5%). Subset analysis based on VCF severity resulted in a specificity of 94.2% (95% CI: 90.9%-96.6%) for grade 0 negative cases and a specificity of 64.3% (95% CI: 35.1%-87.2%) for grade 1 negative cases. For grades 2 and 3 positive cases, sensitivity was 89.7% (95% CI: 79.9%-95.8%) and 99.0% (95% CI: 94.4%-100.0%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CINA-VCF successfully detected incidental VCF and even outperformed clinical reports. The performance was consistent among all subgroups analyzed. Limitations of the tool included various confounding pathologies such as Schmorl's nodes and borderline cases. Despite these limitations, this study validates the applicability and generalizability of the tool in the clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"669-674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001726\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估基于深度学习的椎体压缩性骨折(VCF)检测工具在偶发性VCF患者中的表现。本研究的目的是在多个站点和多个供应商之间验证该工具。方法:这是一项回顾性、多中心、多国盲法研究,在年龄≥50岁的患者中使用匿名胸部和腹部CT扫描检查VCF以外的适应症。图像来自法国和美国的两家远程放射学公司,使用针对VCF检测设计的深度学习算法CINA-VCF v1.0进行处理。基本事实是由3名委员会认证的放射科医生的多数共识确定的。评估CINA-VCF的整体性能,并基于成像采集参数、基线患者特征和VCF严重程度进行亚群分析。一个亚组也与现有的临床放射学报告进行了分析和比较。结果:本研究共纳入474例CT扫描,其中VCF阳性166例(35.0%),阴性308例(65.0%)。CINA-VCF的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.97 (95% CI: 0.96 ~ 0.99),准确率为93.7% (95% CI: 91.1% ~ 95.7%),灵敏度为95.2% (95% CI: 90.7% ~ 97.9%),特异性为92.9% (95% CI: 89.4% ~ 96.5%)。基于VCF严重程度的子集分析结果显示,0级阴性病例的特异性为94.2% (95% CI: 90.9%-96.6%), 1级阴性病例的特异性为64.3% (95% CI: 35.1%-87.2%)。对于2级和3级阳性病例,敏感性分别为89.7% (95% CI: 79.9%-95.8%)和99.0% (95% CI: 94.4%-100.0%)。结论:CINA-VCF能成功检测偶发性VCF,甚至优于临床报道。在分析的所有亚组中,表现是一致的。该工具的局限性包括各种混杂病理,如Schmorl淋巴结和边缘性病例。尽管存在这些限制,本研究验证了该工具在临床环境中的适用性和普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of a Deep Learning Tool for Detection of Incidental Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Objective: This study evaluated the performance of a deep learning-based vertebral compression fracture (VCF) detection tool in patients with incidental VCF. The purpose of this study was to validate this tool across multiple sites and multiple vendors.

Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter, multinational blinded study using anonymized chest and abdominal CT scans performed for indications other than VCF in patients ≥50 years old. Images were obtained from 2 teleradiology companies in France and United States and were processed by CINA-VCF v1.0, a deep learning algorithm designed for VCF detection. Ground truth was established by majority consensus across 3 board-certified radiologists. Overall performance of CINA-VCF was evaluated, as well as subset analyses based on imaging acquisition parameters, baseline patient characteristics, and VCF severity. A subgroup was also analyzed and compared with available clinical radiology reports.

Results: Four hundred seventy-four CT scans were included in this study, comprising 166 (35.0%) positive and 308 (65.0%) negative VCF cases. CINA-VCF demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), accuracy of 93.7% (95% CI: 91.1%-95.7%), sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI: 90.7%-97.9%), and specificity of 92.9% (95% CI: 89.4%-96.5%). Subset analysis based on VCF severity resulted in a specificity of 94.2% (95% CI: 90.9%-96.6%) for grade 0 negative cases and a specificity of 64.3% (95% CI: 35.1%-87.2%) for grade 1 negative cases. For grades 2 and 3 positive cases, sensitivity was 89.7% (95% CI: 79.9%-95.8%) and 99.0% (95% CI: 94.4%-100.0%), respectively.

Conclusions: CINA-VCF successfully detected incidental VCF and even outperformed clinical reports. The performance was consistent among all subgroups analyzed. Limitations of the tool included various confounding pathologies such as Schmorl's nodes and borderline cases. Despite these limitations, this study validates the applicability and generalizability of the tool in the clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信