可能不够:肺叶下切除术vs肺叶切除术治疗临床期IA期非小细胞肺癌患者内脏胸膜侵犯或通过空气间隙扩散。

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Zhang-Yi Dai, Cheng Shen, Xinwei Wang, Fu-Qiang Wang, Yun Wang
{"title":"可能不够:肺叶下切除术vs肺叶切除术治疗临床期IA期非小细胞肺癌患者内脏胸膜侵犯或通过空气间隙扩散。","authors":"Zhang-Yi Dai, Cheng Shen, Xinwei Wang, Fu-Qiang Wang, Yun Wang","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that sublobar resection (SLR) is non-inferior to lobectomy, the comparative efficacy of these procedures remains uncertain for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; ≤3 cm) exhibiting invasive features postoperatively, such as visceral pleural invasion (VPI) or spread through air spaces (STAS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To identify eligible studies, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted through 25 July 2024. Studies were screened according to predefined criteria in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to perform a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 14 retrospective studies and 1 randomized controlled trial, encompassing a total of 8054 patients with NSCLC (tumors ≤3 cm) exhibiting VPI or STAS. The meta-analysis revealed that SLR was associated with impaired 5-year OS (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.10-1.41) and slightly inferior RFS (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.99-1.58) compared to lobectomy for pT2a (VPI) NSCLC patients with tumor ≤3 cm. Similarly, SLR was associated with significantly worse 5-year OS (HR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.92-3.45) and 5-year RFS (HR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.69-3.46) compared to lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC patients with STAS. Subgroup analysis revealed that statistically significant differences in 5-year OS (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.92-1.38) and 5-year RFS (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.56-1.36) were not observed between the SLR and lobectomy groups for pT2a (VPI) NSCLC patients with tumor ≤2 cm. Additionally, no statistically significant survival difference was observed between the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups for NSCLC patients (≤3 cm) with VPI (5-year OS: HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.89-1.52; 5-year RFS: HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.88-1.30) or STAS (5-year OS: HR: 3.88; 95% CI: 0.82-18.31; 5-year RFS: HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.70-3.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For early-stage (≤3 cm) NSCLC with VPI or STAS, SLR was associated with worse survival outcomes compared to lobectomy. However, segmentectomy achieved survival outcomes comparable to those of lobectomy. For pT2a (VPI) NSCLC patients with tumor ≤2 cm, the differences in survival outcomes between SLR and lobectomy were not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2675-2685"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Could less be enough: sublobar resection vs lobectomy for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer patients with visceral pleural invasion or spread through air spaces.\",\"authors\":\"Zhang-Yi Dai, Cheng Shen, Xinwei Wang, Fu-Qiang Wang, Yun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that sublobar resection (SLR) is non-inferior to lobectomy, the comparative efficacy of these procedures remains uncertain for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; ≤3 cm) exhibiting invasive features postoperatively, such as visceral pleural invasion (VPI) or spread through air spaces (STAS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To identify eligible studies, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted through 25 July 2024. Studies were screened according to predefined criteria in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to perform a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 14 retrospective studies and 1 randomized controlled trial, encompassing a total of 8054 patients with NSCLC (tumors ≤3 cm) exhibiting VPI or STAS. The meta-analysis revealed that SLR was associated with impaired 5-year OS (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.10-1.41) and slightly inferior RFS (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.99-1.58) compared to lobectomy for pT2a (VPI) NSCLC patients with tumor ≤3 cm. Similarly, SLR was associated with significantly worse 5-year OS (HR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.92-3.45) and 5-year RFS (HR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.69-3.46) compared to lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC patients with STAS. Subgroup analysis revealed that statistically significant differences in 5-year OS (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.92-1.38) and 5-year RFS (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.56-1.36) were not observed between the SLR and lobectomy groups for pT2a (VPI) NSCLC patients with tumor ≤2 cm. Additionally, no statistically significant survival difference was observed between the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups for NSCLC patients (≤3 cm) with VPI (5-year OS: HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.89-1.52; 5-year RFS: HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.88-1.30) or STAS (5-year OS: HR: 3.88; 95% CI: 0.82-18.31; 5-year RFS: HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.70-3.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For early-stage (≤3 cm) NSCLC with VPI or STAS, SLR was associated with worse survival outcomes compared to lobectomy. However, segmentectomy achieved survival outcomes comparable to those of lobectomy. For pT2a (VPI) NSCLC patients with tumor ≤2 cm, the differences in survival outcomes between SLR and lobectomy were not statistically significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2675-2685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002249\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002249","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然最近的随机对照试验表明,叶下切除术并不比叶下切除术差,但对于早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC;≤3cm),术后表现出侵袭性特征,如内脏胸膜侵犯(VPI)或通过空气间隙扩散(STAS)。材料和方法:为了确定符合条件的研究,我们在2024年7月25日之前对PubMed、Embase、MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science进行了全面的检索。根据PRISMA指南预先确定的标准对研究进行筛选。主要终点是5年总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。采用风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)进行meta分析。结果:最终分析包括14项回顾性研究和1项随机对照试验,共纳入8,054例表现为VPI或STAS的NSCLC(肿瘤≤3cm)患者。荟萃分析显示,叶下切除术与5年OS受损相关(HR: 1.25;95% CI: 1.10-1.41)和稍差的RFS (HR: 1.25;95% CI: 0.99-1.58)与肿瘤≤3cm的pT2a (VPI) NSCLC患者的肺叶切除术相比。同样,叶下切除术与更差的5年OS相关(HR: 2.58;95% CI: 1.92-3.45)和5年RFS (HR: 2.42;95% CI: 1.69-3.46)与伴有STAS的IA期NSCLC患者的肺叶切除术相比。亚组分析显示,两组患者5年OS差异有统计学意义(HR: 1.13;95% CI: 0.92-1.38)和5年RFS (HR: 0.87;95% CI: 0.56-1.36)对于肿瘤≤2 cm的pT2a (VPI) NSCLC患者,叶下切除组与叶下切除组之间无差异。此外,对于NSCLC(≤3 cm)伴有VPI的患者,节段切除组与肺叶切除组的生存率无统计学差异(5年OS: HR: 1.16;95% ci: 0.89-1.52;5年RFS: HR: 1.07;95% CI: 0.88-1.30)或STAS(5年OS: HR: 3.88;95% ci: 0.82-18.31;5年RFS: HR: 1.64;95% ci: 0.70-3.80)。结论:对于早期(≤3cm)伴有VPI或STAS的NSCLC,与肺叶切除术相比,肺叶下切除术的生存结果更差。然而,节段切除术获得的生存结果与肺叶切除术相当。对于肿瘤≤2 cm的pT2a (VPI) NSCLC患者,叶下切除术与肺叶切除术的生存结局差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Could less be enough: sublobar resection vs lobectomy for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer patients with visceral pleural invasion or spread through air spaces.

Background: While recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that sublobar resection (SLR) is non-inferior to lobectomy, the comparative efficacy of these procedures remains uncertain for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; ≤3 cm) exhibiting invasive features postoperatively, such as visceral pleural invasion (VPI) or spread through air spaces (STAS).

Materials and methods: To identify eligible studies, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted through 25 July 2024. Studies were screened according to predefined criteria in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to perform a meta-analysis.

Results: The final analysis included 14 retrospective studies and 1 randomized controlled trial, encompassing a total of 8054 patients with NSCLC (tumors ≤3 cm) exhibiting VPI or STAS. The meta-analysis revealed that SLR was associated with impaired 5-year OS (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.10-1.41) and slightly inferior RFS (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.99-1.58) compared to lobectomy for pT2a (VPI) NSCLC patients with tumor ≤3 cm. Similarly, SLR was associated with significantly worse 5-year OS (HR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.92-3.45) and 5-year RFS (HR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.69-3.46) compared to lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC patients with STAS. Subgroup analysis revealed that statistically significant differences in 5-year OS (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.92-1.38) and 5-year RFS (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.56-1.36) were not observed between the SLR and lobectomy groups for pT2a (VPI) NSCLC patients with tumor ≤2 cm. Additionally, no statistically significant survival difference was observed between the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups for NSCLC patients (≤3 cm) with VPI (5-year OS: HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.89-1.52; 5-year RFS: HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.88-1.30) or STAS (5-year OS: HR: 3.88; 95% CI: 0.82-18.31; 5-year RFS: HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.70-3.80).

Conclusions: For early-stage (≤3 cm) NSCLC with VPI or STAS, SLR was associated with worse survival outcomes compared to lobectomy. However, segmentectomy achieved survival outcomes comparable to those of lobectomy. For pT2a (VPI) NSCLC patients with tumor ≤2 cm, the differences in survival outcomes between SLR and lobectomy were not statistically significant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信