额极皮层与背外侧前额叶皮层相互作用,因果引导元认知。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Georgia E. Kapetaniou, Marius Moisa, Christian C. Ruff, Philippe N. Tobler, Alexander Soutschek
{"title":"额极皮层与背外侧前额叶皮层相互作用,因果引导元认知。","authors":"Georgia E. Kapetaniou,&nbsp;Marius Moisa,&nbsp;Christian C. Ruff,&nbsp;Philippe N. Tobler,&nbsp;Alexander Soutschek","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate metacognitive judgments about an individual's performance in a mental task require the brain to have access to representations of the quality and difficulty of first-order cognitive processes. However, little is known about how accurate metacognitive judgments are implemented in the brain. Here, we combine brain stimulation with functional neuroimaging to determine the neural and psychological mechanisms underlying the frontopolar cortex's (FPC) role in metacognition. Specifically, we evaluate two-layer neural architectures positing that FPC enables metacognitive judgments by communicating with brain regions encoding first-order decision difficulty. In support of two-layer architectures of metacognition, we found that high-intensity transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS; 4 mA peak-to-peak) over FPC impaired metacognitive accuracy; at the neural level, this impairment was reflected by reduced coupling between FPC and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), particularly during difficult metacognitive judgments. We also evaluated conceptual accounts assuming that metacognition relies on self-directed mentalizing. However, we observed no influence of FPC tACS on mentalizing performance and only a weak overlap of the networks underlying metacognition and mentalizing. Together, our findings put the FPC at the center of a two-layer architecture that enables accurate evaluations of cognitive processes, mainly via the FPC's connectivity with regions encoding first-level task difficulty, with little contributions from mentalizing-related processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frontopolar Cortex Interacts With Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Causally Guide Metacognition\",\"authors\":\"Georgia E. Kapetaniou,&nbsp;Marius Moisa,&nbsp;Christian C. Ruff,&nbsp;Philippe N. Tobler,&nbsp;Alexander Soutschek\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.70146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate metacognitive judgments about an individual's performance in a mental task require the brain to have access to representations of the quality and difficulty of first-order cognitive processes. However, little is known about how accurate metacognitive judgments are implemented in the brain. Here, we combine brain stimulation with functional neuroimaging to determine the neural and psychological mechanisms underlying the frontopolar cortex's (FPC) role in metacognition. Specifically, we evaluate two-layer neural architectures positing that FPC enables metacognitive judgments by communicating with brain regions encoding first-order decision difficulty. In support of two-layer architectures of metacognition, we found that high-intensity transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS; 4 mA peak-to-peak) over FPC impaired metacognitive accuracy; at the neural level, this impairment was reflected by reduced coupling between FPC and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), particularly during difficult metacognitive judgments. We also evaluated conceptual accounts assuming that metacognition relies on self-directed mentalizing. However, we observed no influence of FPC tACS on mentalizing performance and only a weak overlap of the networks underlying metacognition and mentalizing. Together, our findings put the FPC at the center of a two-layer architecture that enables accurate evaluations of cognitive processes, mainly via the FPC's connectivity with regions encoding first-level task difficulty, with little contributions from mentalizing-related processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775761/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70146\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对个体在心理任务中的表现做出准确的元认知判断,需要大脑能够获得一阶认知过程的质量和难度的表征。然而,人们对准确的元认知判断是如何在大脑中实现的知之甚少。在这里,我们将脑刺激与功能性神经成像相结合,以确定额极皮层(FPC)在元认知中的作用的神经和心理机制。具体来说,我们评估了两层神经结构,假设FPC通过与编码一阶决策困难的大脑区域通信来实现元认知判断。为了支持元认知的双层结构,我们发现高强度经颅交流电刺激(tACS;4 mA峰对峰)超过FPC后元认知准确性受损;在神经水平上,FPC和背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)之间的耦合减少反映了这种损伤,特别是在困难的元认知判断中。我们还评估了假设元认知依赖于自我导向心理化的概念解释。然而,我们没有观察到FPC tACS对心智化表现的影响,只有元认知和心智化基础的网络有微弱的重叠。总之,我们的研究结果将FPC置于两层结构的中心,该结构主要通过FPC与编码第一级任务难度的区域的连接来准确评估认知过程,而与心智相关的过程几乎没有贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Frontopolar Cortex Interacts With Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Causally Guide Metacognition

Frontopolar Cortex Interacts With Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Causally Guide Metacognition

Accurate metacognitive judgments about an individual's performance in a mental task require the brain to have access to representations of the quality and difficulty of first-order cognitive processes. However, little is known about how accurate metacognitive judgments are implemented in the brain. Here, we combine brain stimulation with functional neuroimaging to determine the neural and psychological mechanisms underlying the frontopolar cortex's (FPC) role in metacognition. Specifically, we evaluate two-layer neural architectures positing that FPC enables metacognitive judgments by communicating with brain regions encoding first-order decision difficulty. In support of two-layer architectures of metacognition, we found that high-intensity transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS; 4 mA peak-to-peak) over FPC impaired metacognitive accuracy; at the neural level, this impairment was reflected by reduced coupling between FPC and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), particularly during difficult metacognitive judgments. We also evaluated conceptual accounts assuming that metacognition relies on self-directed mentalizing. However, we observed no influence of FPC tACS on mentalizing performance and only a weak overlap of the networks underlying metacognition and mentalizing. Together, our findings put the FPC at the center of a two-layer architecture that enables accurate evaluations of cognitive processes, mainly via the FPC's connectivity with regions encoding first-level task difficulty, with little contributions from mentalizing-related processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信