外科医生和助手之间熟悉程度对患者预后的影响:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Daniel R Stelzl, Stephanie Polazzi, Jean-Christophe Lifante, Tanujit Dey, Antoine Duclos
{"title":"外科医生和助手之间熟悉程度对患者预后的影响:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。","authors":"Daniel R Stelzl, Stephanie Polazzi, Jean-Christophe Lifante, Tanujit Dey, Antoine Duclos","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inverse relationship between increased surgical team familiarity and reduced operative time is established, but its effect on patient outcomes remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study including operations by attending surgeons between 1 November 2020 and 31 December 2021 across fourteen surgical departments from four French university hospitals. Surgical team familiarity was measured as the cumulative number of previous operations performed by the same dyad of attending and assisting surgeons. Composite of adverse events within 30 days of surgery encompassed major surgical complication, unplanned reoperation, extended ICU stay, and death. We used multivariable generally estimated equations to model the association between patient outcomes and surgical team familiarity, using a logarithmic function. The model considered the clustering of operations within surgeons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis included 8546 operations by 1109 surgical team dyads, involving 45 attending surgeons and 369 assisting surgeons. We observed a significant inverse association between surgical team familiarity and composite adverse events odds ratio [OR] 0.92 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.87-0.98), major surgical complications OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.99), and unplanned reoperations OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.78-0.99), with non-significant trends observed for extended ICU stays OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.75-1.04) and deaths OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-1.03). Within the first 15 collaborations, this was illustrated by a reduction in the occurrence of composite adverse events from 23.0% (95% CI 22.1%-24.0%) to 16.5% (95% CI 14.1%-18.8%), major surgical complications from 21.3% (95% CI 20.3%-22.2%) to 15.3% (95% CI 13.0%-17.5%), unplanned reoperations from 8.8% (95% CI 8.6%-9.1%) to 5.2% (95%CI 4.2%-6.1%), extended ICU stays from 4.3% (95% CI 4.1%-4.5%) to 3.1% (95% CI 2.0%-4.1%), and deaths from 2.3% (95% CI 2.1%-2.5%) to 1.4% (95% CI 0.9%-1.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study emphasizes that heightened familiarity among surgical teams is associated with a significant reduction in major adverse events. Building stable operating room teams should be a management priority to enhance patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2525-2534"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of familiarity between the surgeon and their assistant on patient outcomes: a prospective observational cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel R Stelzl, Stephanie Polazzi, Jean-Christophe Lifante, Tanujit Dey, Antoine Duclos\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inverse relationship between increased surgical team familiarity and reduced operative time is established, but its effect on patient outcomes remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study including operations by attending surgeons between 1 November 2020 and 31 December 2021 across fourteen surgical departments from four French university hospitals. Surgical team familiarity was measured as the cumulative number of previous operations performed by the same dyad of attending and assisting surgeons. Composite of adverse events within 30 days of surgery encompassed major surgical complication, unplanned reoperation, extended ICU stay, and death. We used multivariable generally estimated equations to model the association between patient outcomes and surgical team familiarity, using a logarithmic function. The model considered the clustering of operations within surgeons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis included 8546 operations by 1109 surgical team dyads, involving 45 attending surgeons and 369 assisting surgeons. We observed a significant inverse association between surgical team familiarity and composite adverse events odds ratio [OR] 0.92 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.87-0.98), major surgical complications OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.99), and unplanned reoperations OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.78-0.99), with non-significant trends observed for extended ICU stays OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.75-1.04) and deaths OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-1.03). Within the first 15 collaborations, this was illustrated by a reduction in the occurrence of composite adverse events from 23.0% (95% CI 22.1%-24.0%) to 16.5% (95% CI 14.1%-18.8%), major surgical complications from 21.3% (95% CI 20.3%-22.2%) to 15.3% (95% CI 13.0%-17.5%), unplanned reoperations from 8.8% (95% CI 8.6%-9.1%) to 5.2% (95%CI 4.2%-6.1%), extended ICU stays from 4.3% (95% CI 4.1%-4.5%) to 3.1% (95% CI 2.0%-4.1%), and deaths from 2.3% (95% CI 2.1%-2.5%) to 1.4% (95% CI 0.9%-1.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study emphasizes that heightened familiarity among surgical teams is associated with a significant reduction in major adverse events. Building stable operating room teams should be a management priority to enhance patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2525-2534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002269\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:增加外科团队熟悉度和减少手术时间之间的反比关系已经建立,但其对患者预后的影响仍不确定。材料和方法:一项前瞻性队列研究,包括2020年11月1日至2021年12月31日期间由法国四所大学医院的14个外科医生进行的手术。手术团队的熟悉程度是由同一组主治和辅助外科医生进行的手术的累积次数来衡量的。手术30天内不良事件的组合包括主要手术并发症、计划外再手术、延长ICU住院时间和死亡。我们使用多变量一般估计方程来模拟患者预后与外科团队熟悉程度之间的关系,使用对数函数。该模型考虑了外科医生的手术聚类。结果:我们分析了1109个外科团队的8546例手术,包括45名主治医生和369名辅助医生。我们观察到,手术团队熟悉度与复合不良事件的比值比[OR] 0.92(95%可信区间[95% CI] 0.87-0.98)、主要手术并发症的比值比OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.99)、意外再手术的比值比OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.78-0.99)呈显著负相关,延长ICU住院时间的比值比OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.75-1.04)和死亡的比值比OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-1.03)呈非显著趋势。在前15次合作中,综合不良事件发生率从23.0% (95%CI 22.1%-24.0%)降低到16.5% (95%CI 14.1%-18.8%),主要手术并发症发生率从21.3% (95%CI 20.3%-22.2%)降低到15.3% (95%CI 13.0%-17.5%),计划外再手术发生率从8.8% (95%CI 8.6%-9.1%)降低到5.2% (95%CI 4.2%-6.1%),延长ICU住院时间从4.3% (95%CI 4.1%-4.5%)降低到3.1% (95%CI 2.0%-4.1%),死亡率从2.3% (95%CI 2.1%-2.5%)降低到1.4% (95%CI 0.9%-1.8%)。结论和相关性:本研究强调,外科团队之间熟悉程度的提高与主要不良事件的显著减少有关。建立稳定的手术室团队应成为提高患者预后的管理重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of familiarity between the surgeon and their assistant on patient outcomes: a prospective observational cohort study.

Background: The inverse relationship between increased surgical team familiarity and reduced operative time is established, but its effect on patient outcomes remains uncertain.

Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study including operations by attending surgeons between 1 November 2020 and 31 December 2021 across fourteen surgical departments from four French university hospitals. Surgical team familiarity was measured as the cumulative number of previous operations performed by the same dyad of attending and assisting surgeons. Composite of adverse events within 30 days of surgery encompassed major surgical complication, unplanned reoperation, extended ICU stay, and death. We used multivariable generally estimated equations to model the association between patient outcomes and surgical team familiarity, using a logarithmic function. The model considered the clustering of operations within surgeons.

Results: Our analysis included 8546 operations by 1109 surgical team dyads, involving 45 attending surgeons and 369 assisting surgeons. We observed a significant inverse association between surgical team familiarity and composite adverse events odds ratio [OR] 0.92 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.87-0.98), major surgical complications OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.99), and unplanned reoperations OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.78-0.99), with non-significant trends observed for extended ICU stays OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.75-1.04) and deaths OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-1.03). Within the first 15 collaborations, this was illustrated by a reduction in the occurrence of composite adverse events from 23.0% (95% CI 22.1%-24.0%) to 16.5% (95% CI 14.1%-18.8%), major surgical complications from 21.3% (95% CI 20.3%-22.2%) to 15.3% (95% CI 13.0%-17.5%), unplanned reoperations from 8.8% (95% CI 8.6%-9.1%) to 5.2% (95%CI 4.2%-6.1%), extended ICU stays from 4.3% (95% CI 4.1%-4.5%) to 3.1% (95% CI 2.0%-4.1%), and deaths from 2.3% (95% CI 2.1%-2.5%) to 1.4% (95% CI 0.9%-1.8%).

Conclusions and relevance: This study emphasizes that heightened familiarity among surgical teams is associated with a significant reduction in major adverse events. Building stable operating room teams should be a management priority to enhance patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信