Jingjing Liu, Lechi Ye, Gengyun Miao, Shengxiang Rao, Mengsu Zeng, Liheng Liu
{"title":"与增强CT相比,非增强缩短MRI作为结直肠癌肝转移的定期监测方案:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Jingjing Liu, Lechi Ye, Gengyun Miao, Shengxiang Rao, Mengsu Zeng, Liheng Liu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adopting an appropriate noninvasive radiological method is crucial for periodic surveillance of liver metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after surgery, which is closely related to clinical management and prognosis. This study aimed to prospectively enroll stage II-III CRC patients for the surveillance of liver metastases and compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) and non-enhanced abbreviated MRI (NE-AMRI) during this process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>587 CRC patients undergoing radical resection of the primary tumor were evaluated by 1 to 3 rounds of surveillance tests, consisting of abdominal CE-CT and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) within 7 days at 6-month intervals. Subsequently, images of NE-AMRI were extracted from the CE-MRI examination, and paired CE-CT and NE-AMRI analysis were performed. The lesion-based detection rates between two protocols were compared, and a subgroup analysis was performed in lesions with a size of ≤10 mm. The patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and the areas under the curves (AUCs) of CE-CT and NE-AMRI in each round were evaluated. Finally, the relationship between the diagnostic accuracy of two protocols and characteristics of patients was explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lesion-based detection rates of NE-AMRI in three rounds were all significantly higher than those of CE-CT ( P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.003, respectively). In the subgroup analysis of lesions ≤ 10 mm, NE-AMRI also performed better than CE-CT ( P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.005, respectively). The patient-based sensitivities, specificities, NPVs, and PPVs of NE-AMRI were higher than those of CE-CT in three rounds of surveillance. The AUCs for NE-AMRI were all significantly better than those for CE-CT in each round ( P = 0.015, P = 0.045, P = 0.009, respectively). Furthermore, patient BMI and fatty liver disease had impacts on the diagnostic accuracy of the CE-CT protocol, but not on the NE-AMRI protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NE-AMRI may be a promising periodic surveillance tool for CRC patients after surgery to increase diagnostic accuracy of liver metastases, developing personalized clinical management and improving prognosis, simultaneously avoiding side effects associated with ionizing radiation and contrast agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2495-2504"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-enhanced abbreviated MRI as a periodic surveillance protocol for colorectal liver metastases compared with contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Liu, Lechi Ye, Gengyun Miao, Shengxiang Rao, Mengsu Zeng, Liheng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adopting an appropriate noninvasive radiological method is crucial for periodic surveillance of liver metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after surgery, which is closely related to clinical management and prognosis. This study aimed to prospectively enroll stage II-III CRC patients for the surveillance of liver metastases and compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) and non-enhanced abbreviated MRI (NE-AMRI) during this process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>587 CRC patients undergoing radical resection of the primary tumor were evaluated by 1 to 3 rounds of surveillance tests, consisting of abdominal CE-CT and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) within 7 days at 6-month intervals. Subsequently, images of NE-AMRI were extracted from the CE-MRI examination, and paired CE-CT and NE-AMRI analysis were performed. The lesion-based detection rates between two protocols were compared, and a subgroup analysis was performed in lesions with a size of ≤10 mm. The patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and the areas under the curves (AUCs) of CE-CT and NE-AMRI in each round were evaluated. Finally, the relationship between the diagnostic accuracy of two protocols and characteristics of patients was explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lesion-based detection rates of NE-AMRI in three rounds were all significantly higher than those of CE-CT ( P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.003, respectively). In the subgroup analysis of lesions ≤ 10 mm, NE-AMRI also performed better than CE-CT ( P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.005, respectively). The patient-based sensitivities, specificities, NPVs, and PPVs of NE-AMRI were higher than those of CE-CT in three rounds of surveillance. The AUCs for NE-AMRI were all significantly better than those for CE-CT in each round ( P = 0.015, P = 0.045, P = 0.009, respectively). Furthermore, patient BMI and fatty liver disease had impacts on the diagnostic accuracy of the CE-CT protocol, but not on the NE-AMRI protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NE-AMRI may be a promising periodic surveillance tool for CRC patients after surgery to increase diagnostic accuracy of liver metastases, developing personalized clinical management and improving prognosis, simultaneously avoiding side effects associated with ionizing radiation and contrast agents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2495-2504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002252\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002252","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:采用适当的无创放射学方法对结直肠癌(CRC)术后肝转移进行定期监测至关重要,与临床处理和预后密切相关。本研究旨在前瞻性招募II-III期CRC患者进行肝转移监测,并在此过程中比较对比增强CT (CE-CT)和非增强缩短MRI (NE-AMRI)的诊断性能。方法:587例行原发肿瘤根治术的结直肠癌患者,每隔6个月在7天内进行1 ~ 3轮监测试验,包括腹部CE-CT和增强MRI (CE-MRI)。随后,从CE-MRI检查中提取NE-AMRI图像,对CE-CT和NE-AMRI进行配对分析。比较两种方案基于病变的检出率,并对≤10 mm的病变进行亚组分析。评估每轮CE-CT和NE-AMRI的患者敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、准确性和曲线下面积(auc)。最后,探讨了两种方案的诊断准确性与患者特征之间的关系。结果:三轮NE-AMRI的病灶检出率均显著高于CE-CT (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.003)。在病灶≤10 mm的亚组分析中,NE-AMRI的表现也优于CE-CT (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.005)。在三轮监测中,NE-AMRI的患者敏感性、特异性、npv、PPVs均高于CE-CT。NE-AMRI各轮auc均显著优于CE-CT (p = 0.015, p = 0.045, p = 0.009)。此外,患者BMI和脂肪肝疾病对CE-CT方案的诊断准确性有影响,但对NE-AMRI方案没有影响。结论:NE-AMRI可能是一种有前景的CRC术后定期监测工具,可以提高肝转移诊断的准确性,制定个性化的临床管理,改善预后,同时避免电离辐射和造影剂相关的副作用。
Non-enhanced abbreviated MRI as a periodic surveillance protocol for colorectal liver metastases compared with contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective observational study.
Background: Adopting an appropriate noninvasive radiological method is crucial for periodic surveillance of liver metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after surgery, which is closely related to clinical management and prognosis. This study aimed to prospectively enroll stage II-III CRC patients for the surveillance of liver metastases and compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) and non-enhanced abbreviated MRI (NE-AMRI) during this process.
Methods: 587 CRC patients undergoing radical resection of the primary tumor were evaluated by 1 to 3 rounds of surveillance tests, consisting of abdominal CE-CT and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) within 7 days at 6-month intervals. Subsequently, images of NE-AMRI were extracted from the CE-MRI examination, and paired CE-CT and NE-AMRI analysis were performed. The lesion-based detection rates between two protocols were compared, and a subgroup analysis was performed in lesions with a size of ≤10 mm. The patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and the areas under the curves (AUCs) of CE-CT and NE-AMRI in each round were evaluated. Finally, the relationship between the diagnostic accuracy of two protocols and characteristics of patients was explored.
Results: The lesion-based detection rates of NE-AMRI in three rounds were all significantly higher than those of CE-CT ( P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.003, respectively). In the subgroup analysis of lesions ≤ 10 mm, NE-AMRI also performed better than CE-CT ( P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.005, respectively). The patient-based sensitivities, specificities, NPVs, and PPVs of NE-AMRI were higher than those of CE-CT in three rounds of surveillance. The AUCs for NE-AMRI were all significantly better than those for CE-CT in each round ( P = 0.015, P = 0.045, P = 0.009, respectively). Furthermore, patient BMI and fatty liver disease had impacts on the diagnostic accuracy of the CE-CT protocol, but not on the NE-AMRI protocol.
Conclusion: NE-AMRI may be a promising periodic surveillance tool for CRC patients after surgery to increase diagnostic accuracy of liver metastases, developing personalized clinical management and improving prognosis, simultaneously avoiding side effects associated with ionizing radiation and contrast agents.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.