一般健康检查中的听力筛查标准能否成为老年人身体虚弱和认知缺陷的间接指标?-根据世界卫生组织最新的听力损失分类进行流行率估计。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yasue Uchida, Saiko Sugiura, Mariko Shimono, Hirokazu Suzuki, Fujiko Ando, Hiroshi Shimokata, Chikako Tange, Yukiko Nishita, Rei Otsuka
{"title":"一般健康检查中的听力筛查标准能否成为老年人身体虚弱和认知缺陷的间接指标?-根据世界卫生组织最新的听力损失分类进行流行率估计。","authors":"Yasue Uchida,&nbsp;Saiko Sugiura,&nbsp;Mariko Shimono,&nbsp;Hirokazu Suzuki,&nbsp;Fujiko Ando,&nbsp;Hiroshi Shimokata,&nbsp;Chikako Tange,&nbsp;Yukiko Nishita,&nbsp;Rei Otsuka","doi":"10.1111/ggi.14992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to reestimate the prevalence of hearing loss based on the updated World Health Organization hearing loss classification and investigate whether existing hearing screening criteria could efficiently screen for frailty or cognitive deficit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data collected from community dwellers aged 40–91 years included 2325 samples. Health checkup hearing screening used were as follows: (A) 30 dB both at 1 and 4 kHz and (B) 30 dB at 1 kHz and 40 dB at 4 kHz were used. For participants aged ≥60 years, frailty according to the modified Cardiovascular Health Study criteria and cognitive deficit defined by a Mini-Mental State Examination score &lt;28 were assessed. Logistic regression was performed to obtain odds ratios for frailty and cognitive deficit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The rates of hearing loss using the updated World Health Organization classification in men were 8.6, 24.1, 54.2, 79.0 and 96.0% in their 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s and 3.7, 12.7, 36.4, 72.1 and 90.4% in women, respectively. Failing hearing screening using criterion A was associated with an increased risk of frailty, a sex-adjusted odds ratio of 4.136 (95% confidence interval, 2.182–7.838) and an increased risk of cognitive deficit: 1.753 (95% confidence interval, 1.346–2.283). After adjusting for age and sex, the effects on frailty and cognitive deficit were no longer significant. The results were similar when criterion B was used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Because of the high prevalence of hearing loss and the ability to utilize existing devices and methodologies, hearing screening for the elderly should be reviewed. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 504–510</b>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":"25 4","pages":"504-510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ggi.14992","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can hearing screening criteria at general health checkups be an indirect indicator of frailty and cognitive deficit in the older population? – with prevalence estimates based on updated World Health Organization hearing loss classification\",\"authors\":\"Yasue Uchida,&nbsp;Saiko Sugiura,&nbsp;Mariko Shimono,&nbsp;Hirokazu Suzuki,&nbsp;Fujiko Ando,&nbsp;Hiroshi Shimokata,&nbsp;Chikako Tange,&nbsp;Yukiko Nishita,&nbsp;Rei Otsuka\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggi.14992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to reestimate the prevalence of hearing loss based on the updated World Health Organization hearing loss classification and investigate whether existing hearing screening criteria could efficiently screen for frailty or cognitive deficit.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data collected from community dwellers aged 40–91 years included 2325 samples. Health checkup hearing screening used were as follows: (A) 30 dB both at 1 and 4 kHz and (B) 30 dB at 1 kHz and 40 dB at 4 kHz were used. For participants aged ≥60 years, frailty according to the modified Cardiovascular Health Study criteria and cognitive deficit defined by a Mini-Mental State Examination score &lt;28 were assessed. Logistic regression was performed to obtain odds ratios for frailty and cognitive deficit.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The rates of hearing loss using the updated World Health Organization classification in men were 8.6, 24.1, 54.2, 79.0 and 96.0% in their 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s and 3.7, 12.7, 36.4, 72.1 and 90.4% in women, respectively. Failing hearing screening using criterion A was associated with an increased risk of frailty, a sex-adjusted odds ratio of 4.136 (95% confidence interval, 2.182–7.838) and an increased risk of cognitive deficit: 1.753 (95% confidence interval, 1.346–2.283). After adjusting for age and sex, the effects on frailty and cognitive deficit were no longer significant. The results were similar when criterion B was used.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Because of the high prevalence of hearing loss and the ability to utilize existing devices and methodologies, hearing screening for the elderly should be reviewed. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 504–510</b>.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"504-510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ggi.14992\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatrics & Gerontology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.14992\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.14992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在根据最新的世界卫生组织听力损失分类重新估计听力损失的患病率,并调查现有的听力筛查标准是否可以有效地筛查虚弱或认知缺陷。方法:收集40 ~ 91岁社区居民资料2325份。使用的健康检查听力筛查方法如下:(A)使用1和4 kHz的30 dB; (B)使用1 kHz的30 dB和4 kHz的40 dB。对于年龄≥60岁的参与者,根据修改的心血管健康研究标准的虚弱和由迷你精神状态检查评分定义的认知缺陷结果:使用更新的世界卫生组织分类,男性的听力损失率在40岁,50岁,60岁,70岁和80岁分别为8.6,24.1,54.2,79.0和96.0%,女性分别为3.7,12.7,36.4,72.1和90.4%。使用标准A进行听力筛查失败与虚弱风险增加相关,性别调整后的优势比为4.136(95%可信区间,2.182-7.838),认知缺陷风险增加:1.753(95%可信区间,1.346-2.283)。在调整了年龄和性别后,对虚弱和认知缺陷的影响不再显著。采用标准B时结果相似。结论:由于老年人听力损失的高发率和现有设备和方法的使用能力,老年人听力筛查应重新审视。Geriatr Gerontol 2025;••: ••-••.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Can hearing screening criteria at general health checkups be an indirect indicator of frailty and cognitive deficit in the older population? – with prevalence estimates based on updated World Health Organization hearing loss classification

Can hearing screening criteria at general health checkups be an indirect indicator of frailty and cognitive deficit in the older population? – with prevalence estimates based on updated World Health Organization hearing loss classification

Aim

This study aimed to reestimate the prevalence of hearing loss based on the updated World Health Organization hearing loss classification and investigate whether existing hearing screening criteria could efficiently screen for frailty or cognitive deficit.

Methods

Data collected from community dwellers aged 40–91 years included 2325 samples. Health checkup hearing screening used were as follows: (A) 30 dB both at 1 and 4 kHz and (B) 30 dB at 1 kHz and 40 dB at 4 kHz were used. For participants aged ≥60 years, frailty according to the modified Cardiovascular Health Study criteria and cognitive deficit defined by a Mini-Mental State Examination score <28 were assessed. Logistic regression was performed to obtain odds ratios for frailty and cognitive deficit.

Results

The rates of hearing loss using the updated World Health Organization classification in men were 8.6, 24.1, 54.2, 79.0 and 96.0% in their 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s and 3.7, 12.7, 36.4, 72.1 and 90.4% in women, respectively. Failing hearing screening using criterion A was associated with an increased risk of frailty, a sex-adjusted odds ratio of 4.136 (95% confidence interval, 2.182–7.838) and an increased risk of cognitive deficit: 1.753 (95% confidence interval, 1.346–2.283). After adjusting for age and sex, the effects on frailty and cognitive deficit were no longer significant. The results were similar when criterion B was used.

Conclusion

Because of the high prevalence of hearing loss and the ability to utilize existing devices and methodologies, hearing screening for the elderly should be reviewed. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 504–510.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信