解决医疗保健差距和改善农村社区骨质疏松症管理:一项聚类随机对照试验

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Shau-Huai Fu, Wei-Jhen Lai, Hung-Kuan Yen, Shikha Kukreti, Chung-Yi Li, Chih-Chien Hung, Chen-Yu Wang
{"title":"解决医疗保健差距和改善农村社区骨质疏松症管理:一项聚类随机对照试验","authors":"Shau-Huai Fu,&nbsp;Wei-Jhen Lai,&nbsp;Hung-Kuan Yen,&nbsp;Shikha Kukreti,&nbsp;Chung-Yi Li,&nbsp;Chih-Chien Hung,&nbsp;Chen-Yu Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11657-025-01498-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>\n <i>Summary</i>\n </h3><p>Rural communities face healthcare challenges. This study assessed a multicomponent intervention to improve hospital visits and anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) treatment rates. A total of 567 patients were randomized into three groups. Results showed significant improvements in hospital attendance and AOM treatment in intervention groups compared to usual care group.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Rural communities face limited healthcare access, financial constraints, and transportation barriers leading to health disparities. This study examined interventions that reduced health disparities in increasing the outpatient attendance and treatment rate of anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM), while identifying factors contributing to therapy refusal in rural communities.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 567 patients were randomized at the community level into three groups: multicomponent integrated care (MIC), osteoporosis care only (OC), and usual care (UC). Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans were used to evaluate the osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture risk. High- and moderate-risk patients were advised to pursue further hospital-based assessments and treatment. Both the MIC and OC groups received five interventions to address rural barriers, including specialist access, disease education, overcoming transportation barriers, peer support, and dedicated case managers. However, UC excluded transportation assistance, peer support, and case management. Outcomes measured included outpatient attendance, AOM treatment rates, and factors affecting hospital assessment refusal, analyzed via multivariable logistic modeling.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In the MIC group, 73.3% of patients attended the outpatient clinic and 58.6% received AOM. In the OC group, 81% patients attended and 69.3% received AOM. Conversely, in the UC group, only 4.1% attended and received AOM. Significant differences in attendance and AOM rates were found between the MIC and UC groups and between the OC and UC groups (<i>p</i> &lt; .001 for both). Common barriers included beliefs that treatment was unnecessary and lack of hospital access. Risk factors hindering outpatient attendance include male sex, low education, low budget, multiple disabilities, and osteopenia diagnosis.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Addressing transportation barriers and implementing dedicated case management are crucial for improving healthcare access among rural patients.</p><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05104034.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing healthcare disparities and improving osteoporosis management in rural communities: a cluster randomized control trial\",\"authors\":\"Shau-Huai Fu,&nbsp;Wei-Jhen Lai,&nbsp;Hung-Kuan Yen,&nbsp;Shikha Kukreti,&nbsp;Chung-Yi Li,&nbsp;Chih-Chien Hung,&nbsp;Chen-Yu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11657-025-01498-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>\\n <i>Summary</i>\\n </h3><p>Rural communities face healthcare challenges. This study assessed a multicomponent intervention to improve hospital visits and anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) treatment rates. A total of 567 patients were randomized into three groups. Results showed significant improvements in hospital attendance and AOM treatment in intervention groups compared to usual care group.</p><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Rural communities face limited healthcare access, financial constraints, and transportation barriers leading to health disparities. This study examined interventions that reduced health disparities in increasing the outpatient attendance and treatment rate of anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM), while identifying factors contributing to therapy refusal in rural communities.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 567 patients were randomized at the community level into three groups: multicomponent integrated care (MIC), osteoporosis care only (OC), and usual care (UC). Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans were used to evaluate the osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture risk. High- and moderate-risk patients were advised to pursue further hospital-based assessments and treatment. Both the MIC and OC groups received five interventions to address rural barriers, including specialist access, disease education, overcoming transportation barriers, peer support, and dedicated case managers. However, UC excluded transportation assistance, peer support, and case management. Outcomes measured included outpatient attendance, AOM treatment rates, and factors affecting hospital assessment refusal, analyzed via multivariable logistic modeling.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In the MIC group, 73.3% of patients attended the outpatient clinic and 58.6% received AOM. In the OC group, 81% patients attended and 69.3% received AOM. Conversely, in the UC group, only 4.1% attended and received AOM. Significant differences in attendance and AOM rates were found between the MIC and UC groups and between the OC and UC groups (<i>p</i> &lt; .001 for both). Common barriers included beliefs that treatment was unnecessary and lack of hospital access. Risk factors hindering outpatient attendance include male sex, low education, low budget, multiple disabilities, and osteopenia diagnosis.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Addressing transportation barriers and implementing dedicated case management are crucial for improving healthcare access among rural patients.</p><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05104034.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Osteoporosis\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Osteoporosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-025-01498-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-025-01498-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农村社区面临着医疗保健方面的挑战。本研究评估了多组分干预以提高医院就诊率和抗骨质疏松药物(AOM)治疗率。567例患者随机分为三组。结果显示,与常规护理组相比,干预组在住院率和AOM治疗方面有显著改善。目的:农村社区面临有限的医疗保健机会、财政限制和交通障碍导致的健康差异。本研究考察了在提高门诊出勤率和抗骨质疏松药物(AOM)治疗率方面减少健康差异的干预措施,同时确定了导致农村社区拒绝治疗的因素。方法:567例患者在社区水平随机分为三组:多组分综合护理(MIC)组、骨质疏松症护理(OC)组和常规护理(UC)组。骨折风险评估工具和双能x线吸收仪扫描评估骨质疏松症和骨质疏松性骨折的风险。建议高风险和中度风险患者进一步进行医院评估和治疗。中等收入和中等收入群体都接受了五项干预措施,以解决农村障碍,包括获得专家服务、疾病教育、克服交通障碍、同伴支持和专门的病例管理人员。然而,UC不包括交通援助、同伴支持和病例管理。测量的结果包括门诊就诊率、AOM治疗率和影响医院评估拒绝的因素,并通过多变量logistic模型进行分析。结果:MIC组73.3%的患者到门诊就诊,58.6%的患者接受了AOM治疗。在OC组,81%的患者参加了治疗,69.3%的患者接受了AOM治疗。相反,UC组只有4.1%的人参加并接受了AOM。MIC组和UC组之间以及OC组和UC组之间的出勤率和AOM率存在显著差异(p结论:解决交通障碍和实施专门的病例管理对于改善农村患者的医疗保健可及性至关重要。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05104034。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Addressing healthcare disparities and improving osteoporosis management in rural communities: a cluster randomized control trial

Addressing healthcare disparities and improving osteoporosis management in rural communities: a cluster randomized control trial

Summary

Rural communities face healthcare challenges. This study assessed a multicomponent intervention to improve hospital visits and anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) treatment rates. A total of 567 patients were randomized into three groups. Results showed significant improvements in hospital attendance and AOM treatment in intervention groups compared to usual care group.

Purpose

Rural communities face limited healthcare access, financial constraints, and transportation barriers leading to health disparities. This study examined interventions that reduced health disparities in increasing the outpatient attendance and treatment rate of anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM), while identifying factors contributing to therapy refusal in rural communities.

Methods

A total of 567 patients were randomized at the community level into three groups: multicomponent integrated care (MIC), osteoporosis care only (OC), and usual care (UC). Fracture Risk Assessment Tool and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans were used to evaluate the osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture risk. High- and moderate-risk patients were advised to pursue further hospital-based assessments and treatment. Both the MIC and OC groups received five interventions to address rural barriers, including specialist access, disease education, overcoming transportation barriers, peer support, and dedicated case managers. However, UC excluded transportation assistance, peer support, and case management. Outcomes measured included outpatient attendance, AOM treatment rates, and factors affecting hospital assessment refusal, analyzed via multivariable logistic modeling.

Results

In the MIC group, 73.3% of patients attended the outpatient clinic and 58.6% received AOM. In the OC group, 81% patients attended and 69.3% received AOM. Conversely, in the UC group, only 4.1% attended and received AOM. Significant differences in attendance and AOM rates were found between the MIC and UC groups and between the OC and UC groups (p < .001 for both). Common barriers included beliefs that treatment was unnecessary and lack of hospital access. Risk factors hindering outpatient attendance include male sex, low education, low budget, multiple disabilities, and osteopenia diagnosis.

Conclusion

Addressing transportation barriers and implementing dedicated case management are crucial for improving healthcare access among rural patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05104034.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信