护士在实施集体谈判协议前对工会参与的看法:一项质性研究。

IF 0.9 Q4 NURSING
Jacqueline Christianson, Bonnie Sommers-Olson, Cathleen Fox, Norah L Johnson
{"title":"护士在实施集体谈判协议前对工会参与的看法:一项质性研究。","authors":"Jacqueline Christianson, Bonnie Sommers-Olson, Cathleen Fox, Norah L Johnson","doi":"10.1177/10784535251314146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patient advocacy is a duty for professional nurses; however, not all nurses are empowered to advocate for meeting patients' needs. Participation in labor unions may serve as a venue for nurses with limited institutional decision-making authority to advocate for patient needs; however, unionization can be a time-intensive and fraught process. <b>Purpose:</b> This study examined how nurses participating in a new union in an urban United States hospital described their reasons for participating in a labor union during collective bargaining. <b>Methods:</b> Content analysis of participant's interviews that took place between January and March 2023, after the nurses voted to unionize and collective bargaining had commenced but progress had stalled, and before additional actions (e.g., informational picketing, labor strikes) were authorized by union members. <b>Findings:</b> Content analysis generated three themes: (a) systemic barriers to advocacy, (b) unionization as an advocacy method, and (c) professional empowerment through unionization. Nurses in this study perceived barriers to meeting patient care needs that were insufficiently addressed prior to unionization. They described their motivation to participate in the union due to their desire to advocate despite adversity and finding empowerment through union activities. <b>Implications for Practice:</b> This study highlights the need for equity in decision-making authority and greater opportunities for nurses to effect workplace changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54104,"journal":{"name":"Creative Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"10784535251314146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse Perspectives on Labor Union Participation Prior to Implementation of a Collective Bargaining Agreement: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Christianson, Bonnie Sommers-Olson, Cathleen Fox, Norah L Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10784535251314146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patient advocacy is a duty for professional nurses; however, not all nurses are empowered to advocate for meeting patients' needs. Participation in labor unions may serve as a venue for nurses with limited institutional decision-making authority to advocate for patient needs; however, unionization can be a time-intensive and fraught process. <b>Purpose:</b> This study examined how nurses participating in a new union in an urban United States hospital described their reasons for participating in a labor union during collective bargaining. <b>Methods:</b> Content analysis of participant's interviews that took place between January and March 2023, after the nurses voted to unionize and collective bargaining had commenced but progress had stalled, and before additional actions (e.g., informational picketing, labor strikes) were authorized by union members. <b>Findings:</b> Content analysis generated three themes: (a) systemic barriers to advocacy, (b) unionization as an advocacy method, and (c) professional empowerment through unionization. Nurses in this study perceived barriers to meeting patient care needs that were insufficiently addressed prior to unionization. They described their motivation to participate in the union due to their desire to advocate despite adversity and finding empowerment through union activities. <b>Implications for Practice:</b> This study highlights the need for equity in decision-making authority and greater opportunities for nurses to effect workplace changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Creative Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10784535251314146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Creative Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10784535251314146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10784535251314146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为患者辩护是专业护士的职责;然而,并不是所有的护士都有权倡导满足病人的需求。参加工会可以作为一个场所,护士有限的机构决策权倡导患者的需求;然而,组建工会可能是一个耗时且令人担忧的过程。目的:本研究考察了在美国城市医院参加新工会的护士如何描述他们在集体谈判期间参加工会的原因。方法:对2023年1月至3月期间进行的参与者访谈进行内容分析,这些访谈发生在护士投票成立工会和集体谈判开始但进展停滞之后,以及工会成员授权采取额外行动(如信息纠察、罢工)之前。结果:内容分析产生了三个主题:(a)倡导的系统性障碍,(b)作为倡导方法的工会化,以及(c)通过工会化赋予专业权力。在这项研究中,护士认为在工会成立之前,满足患者护理需求的障碍没有得到充分解决。他们解释说,之所以参加工会,是因为他们想要在逆境中坚持主张,并通过工会活动找到力量。对实践的启示:本研究强调需要平等的决策权和更多的机会,护士影响工作场所的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurse Perspectives on Labor Union Participation Prior to Implementation of a Collective Bargaining Agreement: A Qualitative Study.

Background: Patient advocacy is a duty for professional nurses; however, not all nurses are empowered to advocate for meeting patients' needs. Participation in labor unions may serve as a venue for nurses with limited institutional decision-making authority to advocate for patient needs; however, unionization can be a time-intensive and fraught process. Purpose: This study examined how nurses participating in a new union in an urban United States hospital described their reasons for participating in a labor union during collective bargaining. Methods: Content analysis of participant's interviews that took place between January and March 2023, after the nurses voted to unionize and collective bargaining had commenced but progress had stalled, and before additional actions (e.g., informational picketing, labor strikes) were authorized by union members. Findings: Content analysis generated three themes: (a) systemic barriers to advocacy, (b) unionization as an advocacy method, and (c) professional empowerment through unionization. Nurses in this study perceived barriers to meeting patient care needs that were insufficiently addressed prior to unionization. They described their motivation to participate in the union due to their desire to advocate despite adversity and finding empowerment through union activities. Implications for Practice: This study highlights the need for equity in decision-making authority and greater opportunities for nurses to effect workplace changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Creative Nursing
Creative Nursing NURSING-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Creative Nursing is an issue focused journal, unique in its recognition of the values inherent in the nursing profession. Excellence and professionalism are not exclusive to any one discipline or specialty, and the editors of Creative Nursing are dedicated to developing nursing leaders at all levels and in all settings. Today"s health care institutions need creative and innovative solutions. Nurses need to think creatively, to experiment, to take risks, and to innovate. Creative Nursing promotes best practices in all aspects of caring--caring for self, patients, families, colleagues, and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信