是否有一种简单易行的方法来改善急性梗死核心成像?从延迟相位采集获得的稳态CT血管造影源图像的效用。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alex Mortimer, Richard Flood, Sophie Dunkerton, Sarah Beth McClelland, David Minks, Robert Crossley, James Wareham, Aubrey Smith, Anthony Cox, Rose Bosnell
{"title":"是否有一种简单易行的方法来改善急性梗死核心成像?从延迟相位采集获得的稳态CT血管造影源图像的效用。","authors":"Alex Mortimer, Richard Flood, Sophie Dunkerton, Sarah Beth McClelland, David Minks, Robert Crossley, James Wareham, Aubrey Smith, Anthony Cox, Rose Bosnell","doi":"10.1177/15910199251315790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification and quantification of core infarct is of importance in stroke management for treatment selection, prognostication, and complication prediction. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) (NCCT) remains the primary tool, but it suffers from limited sensitivity and inter-rater variability; CT perfusion is inconsistently available and commonly blighted by movement artefact. We assessed the performance of a standardised form of CT angiographic source imaging (CTASI) obtained through addition of a delayed phase at 40 seconds post-contrast injection (DP40) following fast-acquisition CT angiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Contrast resolution between ischaemic and normal grey matter (GM) was compared qualitatively and quantitatively to NCCT. Using Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), DP40 low density was compared to NCCT and venous phase CT perfusion source images (CTPSI) and to 24-hour NCCT ASPECTS in patients with timely endovascular recanalisation (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction 2C/3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four patients with a proximal middle cerebral artery or terminal internal carotid artery occlusion were included. The mean attenuation difference between ischaemic and normal GM increased from 4.86+/-3.12 HU (NCCT) to 9.30+/-3.14 HU (DP40) (p < 0.0001). Subjective assessment by two raters revealed that DP40 improved ischaemic tissue conspicuity in 39 to 41 (78-82%) of cases (kappa 0.805, standard error 0.108, 95% confidence interval: 0.593-1.000). The correlation between ASPECTS on baseline imaging and eventual 24-hour ASPECTS improved from R = 0.7197 for NCCT to R = 0.9875 for DP40 (z = 7.89, p < 0.0001). The correlation between DP40 and venous phase CTPSI ASPECTS was 0.9681, p < 0.0001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DP40 CTASI represent a simple technique for improving detection and estimation of extent of ischaemia over NCCT and show close correlation with surrogate measures of infarct core.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251315790"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there a simple and accessible solution to improve acute infarct core imaging? The utility of steady-state CT angiographic source images obtained from a delayed phase acquisition.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Mortimer, Richard Flood, Sophie Dunkerton, Sarah Beth McClelland, David Minks, Robert Crossley, James Wareham, Aubrey Smith, Anthony Cox, Rose Bosnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199251315790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification and quantification of core infarct is of importance in stroke management for treatment selection, prognostication, and complication prediction. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) (NCCT) remains the primary tool, but it suffers from limited sensitivity and inter-rater variability; CT perfusion is inconsistently available and commonly blighted by movement artefact. We assessed the performance of a standardised form of CT angiographic source imaging (CTASI) obtained through addition of a delayed phase at 40 seconds post-contrast injection (DP40) following fast-acquisition CT angiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Contrast resolution between ischaemic and normal grey matter (GM) was compared qualitatively and quantitatively to NCCT. Using Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), DP40 low density was compared to NCCT and venous phase CT perfusion source images (CTPSI) and to 24-hour NCCT ASPECTS in patients with timely endovascular recanalisation (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction 2C/3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four patients with a proximal middle cerebral artery or terminal internal carotid artery occlusion were included. The mean attenuation difference between ischaemic and normal GM increased from 4.86+/-3.12 HU (NCCT) to 9.30+/-3.14 HU (DP40) (p < 0.0001). Subjective assessment by two raters revealed that DP40 improved ischaemic tissue conspicuity in 39 to 41 (78-82%) of cases (kappa 0.805, standard error 0.108, 95% confidence interval: 0.593-1.000). The correlation between ASPECTS on baseline imaging and eventual 24-hour ASPECTS improved from R = 0.7197 for NCCT to R = 0.9875 for DP40 (z = 7.89, p < 0.0001). The correlation between DP40 and venous phase CTPSI ASPECTS was 0.9681, p < 0.0001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DP40 CTASI represent a simple technique for improving detection and estimation of extent of ischaemia over NCCT and show close correlation with surrogate measures of infarct core.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199251315790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251315790\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251315790","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:核心梗死的早期识别和量化对卒中治疗选择、预后和并发症预测具有重要意义。非对比计算机断层扫描(CT) (NCCT)仍然是主要的工具,但它的灵敏度有限,而且在不同的比率之间存在差异;CT灌注不一致,常受运动伪影影响。我们评估了一种标准化的CT血管成像源成像(CTASI)的性能,该成像源成像是在快速采集CT血管成像后,在造影剂注射后40秒(DP40)添加延迟相位获得的。方法:用NCCT对缺血灰质和正常灰质(GM)的对比分辨率进行定性和定量比较。使用Alberta卒中Program早期CT评分(ASPECTS),将DP40低密度与及时血管内再通(脑梗死溶栓2C/3)患者的NCCT和静脉期CT灌注源图像(CTPSI)以及24小时NCCT ASPECTS进行比较。结果:74例大脑中动脉近端或颈内动脉末段闭塞。缺血和正常GM之间的平均衰减差从4.86+/-3.12 HU (NCCT)增加到9.30+/-3.14 HU (DP40) (p)。结论:DP40 CTASI是一种简单的技术,可以改善NCCT缺血程度的检测和估计,并与梗死核心的替代测量密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is there a simple and accessible solution to improve acute infarct core imaging? The utility of steady-state CT angiographic source images obtained from a delayed phase acquisition.

Background: Early identification and quantification of core infarct is of importance in stroke management for treatment selection, prognostication, and complication prediction. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) (NCCT) remains the primary tool, but it suffers from limited sensitivity and inter-rater variability; CT perfusion is inconsistently available and commonly blighted by movement artefact. We assessed the performance of a standardised form of CT angiographic source imaging (CTASI) obtained through addition of a delayed phase at 40 seconds post-contrast injection (DP40) following fast-acquisition CT angiography.

Methods: Contrast resolution between ischaemic and normal grey matter (GM) was compared qualitatively and quantitatively to NCCT. Using Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), DP40 low density was compared to NCCT and venous phase CT perfusion source images (CTPSI) and to 24-hour NCCT ASPECTS in patients with timely endovascular recanalisation (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction 2C/3).

Results: Seventy-four patients with a proximal middle cerebral artery or terminal internal carotid artery occlusion were included. The mean attenuation difference between ischaemic and normal GM increased from 4.86+/-3.12 HU (NCCT) to 9.30+/-3.14 HU (DP40) (p < 0.0001). Subjective assessment by two raters revealed that DP40 improved ischaemic tissue conspicuity in 39 to 41 (78-82%) of cases (kappa 0.805, standard error 0.108, 95% confidence interval: 0.593-1.000). The correlation between ASPECTS on baseline imaging and eventual 24-hour ASPECTS improved from R = 0.7197 for NCCT to R = 0.9875 for DP40 (z = 7.89, p < 0.0001). The correlation between DP40 and venous phase CTPSI ASPECTS was 0.9681, p < 0.0001.

Conclusion: DP40 CTASI represent a simple technique for improving detection and estimation of extent of ischaemia over NCCT and show close correlation with surrogate measures of infarct core.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信