加热、加湿、高流量鼻插管的使用与极早产儿住院时间的关系

Q3 Medicine
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2174/0118743064336750241115115435
Tareq F Alotaibi, Dana Alzahrani, Fawzeah Alenazi, Sarah Altokhais, Afnan Slemani, Kamal Ali, Raghad Alzahrani, Abdullah M Alanazi, Taha Ismaeil, Mohammed Alqahtani, Saif Alsaif, Saleh S Algarni
{"title":"加热、加湿、高流量鼻插管的使用与极早产儿住院时间的关系","authors":"Tareq F Alotaibi, Dana Alzahrani, Fawzeah Alenazi, Sarah Altokhais, Afnan Slemani, Kamal Ali, Raghad Alzahrani, Abdullah M Alanazi, Taha Ismaeil, Mohammed Alqahtani, Saif Alsaif, Saleh S Algarni","doi":"10.2174/0118743064336750241115115435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extremely preterm infants (EPIs) often require advanced respiratory support to survive, and one such intervention is the heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC). While the use of this cannula in EPIs has been studied, the relationship between its use and the length of hospital stay is an important yet unexplored research area that we aim to investigate in this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a quantitative retrospective cohort study, data were extracted from an electronic database. The study included all EPIs younger than 28 weeks of gestational age admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. The descriptive analysis was conducted to describe each infant's demographic, maternal, and neonatal characteristics. A chi-squared test was also conducted, and a <i>p</i>-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings suggest that infants who receive an HHHFNC have a longer hospital stay than those who do not. Specifically, infants who did not receive a cannula spent 42.5 days on average in the hospital, compared with 99 days among those who received it, with a significant <i>p</i>-value (p=0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Infants receiving a cannula stay in hospital on average for twice as long as those who do not. However, to reduce the possibility of bias and produce more reliable results, we advise conducting clinical trials or prospective studies in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":39127,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","volume":"18 ","pages":"e18743064336750"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of Heated, Humidified, High-flow Nasal Cannulas, and Length of Hospital Stay Among Extremely Preterm Infants.\",\"authors\":\"Tareq F Alotaibi, Dana Alzahrani, Fawzeah Alenazi, Sarah Altokhais, Afnan Slemani, Kamal Ali, Raghad Alzahrani, Abdullah M Alanazi, Taha Ismaeil, Mohammed Alqahtani, Saif Alsaif, Saleh S Algarni\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0118743064336750241115115435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extremely preterm infants (EPIs) often require advanced respiratory support to survive, and one such intervention is the heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC). While the use of this cannula in EPIs has been studied, the relationship between its use and the length of hospital stay is an important yet unexplored research area that we aim to investigate in this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a quantitative retrospective cohort study, data were extracted from an electronic database. The study included all EPIs younger than 28 weeks of gestational age admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. The descriptive analysis was conducted to describe each infant's demographic, maternal, and neonatal characteristics. A chi-squared test was also conducted, and a <i>p</i>-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings suggest that infants who receive an HHHFNC have a longer hospital stay than those who do not. Specifically, infants who did not receive a cannula spent 42.5 days on average in the hospital, compared with 99 days among those who received it, with a significant <i>p</i>-value (p=0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Infants receiving a cannula stay in hospital on average for twice as long as those who do not. However, to reduce the possibility of bias and produce more reliable results, we advise conducting clinical trials or prospective studies in future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"e18743064336750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770829/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118743064336750241115115435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118743064336750241115115435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:极早产儿(EPIs)通常需要高级呼吸支持才能生存,其中一种干预措施是加热、湿化、高流量鼻插管(HHHFNC)。虽然已经研究了这种套管在EPIs中的使用,但其使用与住院时间之间的关系是一个重要但尚未探索的研究领域,我们的目标是在本研究中进行调查。方法:采用定量回顾性队列研究,从电子数据库中提取数据。该研究纳入了2020年1月1日至2022年12月31日在某三级医院新生儿重症监护室住院的所有孕周小于28周的EPIs。描述性分析用于描述每个婴儿的人口统计学特征、母亲特征和新生儿特征。并进行卡方检验,p值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:研究结果表明,接受HHHFNC的婴儿比没有接受HHHFNC的婴儿住院时间更长。具体而言,未接受插管的婴儿平均住院时间为42.5天,而接受插管的婴儿平均住院时间为99天,p值显著(p=0.0001)。结论:接受插管的婴儿平均住院时间是未接受插管婴儿的两倍。然而,为了减少偏倚的可能性并产生更可靠的结果,我们建议在未来的研究中进行临床试验或前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of Heated, Humidified, High-flow Nasal Cannulas, and Length of Hospital Stay Among Extremely Preterm Infants.

Background: Extremely preterm infants (EPIs) often require advanced respiratory support to survive, and one such intervention is the heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC). While the use of this cannula in EPIs has been studied, the relationship between its use and the length of hospital stay is an important yet unexplored research area that we aim to investigate in this study.

Methods: In a quantitative retrospective cohort study, data were extracted from an electronic database. The study included all EPIs younger than 28 weeks of gestational age admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. The descriptive analysis was conducted to describe each infant's demographic, maternal, and neonatal characteristics. A chi-squared test was also conducted, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The findings suggest that infants who receive an HHHFNC have a longer hospital stay than those who do not. Specifically, infants who did not receive a cannula spent 42.5 days on average in the hospital, compared with 99 days among those who received it, with a significant p-value (p=0.0001).

Conclusion: Infants receiving a cannula stay in hospital on average for twice as long as those who do not. However, to reduce the possibility of bias and produce more reliable results, we advise conducting clinical trials or prospective studies in future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of experimental and clinical research in respiratory medicine. Topics covered include: -COPD- Occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants- Asthma- Allergy- Non-invasive ventilation- Therapeutic intervention- Lung cancer- Lung infections respiratory diseases- Therapeutic interventions- Adult and paediatric medicine- Cell biology. The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal, a peer reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on important recent developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and making them freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信