Wei-Hang Liu, Mao Xiong, Guo-Qing Chen, Zhui Long, Chao Xu, Li Zhu, Jing-Song Wu
{"title":"腹腔镜体腔内吻合术与开放式吻合术在克罗恩病回肠造口翻转术中的应用:单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Wei-Hang Liu, Mao Xiong, Guo-Qing Chen, Zhui Long, Chao Xu, Li Zhu, Jing-Song Wu","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.98269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an increased maturation of laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis techniques. However, research on its application for small bowel stoma reversal in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) is limited. Therefore, in this study, we compared the perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic intracorporeal ileostomy reversal (LIIR) and open ileostomy reversal (OIR).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the safety, feasibility, bowel function recovery, and short- and long-term LIIR and OIR outcomes in patients with CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients who underwent ileal reversal for CD between January 2021 and January 2023 at our institution. The baseline data, postoperative recovery, and complication indicators were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore factors that significantly influenced the development of enteral nutrition intolerance-related symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Notably, 15 of the 45 patients in this study underwent OIR, and the remaining 30 received LIIR. Notably, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding clinical baseline characteristics, operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, anastomotic site, enterolysis range, first postoperative flatus, postoperative complications, reoperation rate, or incidence of postoperative enteral nutrition intolerance. Compared with the OIR group, the LIIR group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (<i>P</i> = 0.045), lower incidence of enteral nutrition intolerance symptoms (<i>P</i> = 0.019), and earlier postoperative total enteral nutrition initiation (<i>P</i> = 0.033); however, it incurred higher total hospital costs (<i>P</i> = 0.038). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the duration of surgery and anastomotic technique were independent risk factors for postoperative symptoms of enteral nutrition intolerance (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for ileostomy reversal is safe and feasible. Patients who underwent this technique demonstrated improved tolerance to postoperative enteral nutrition and quicker resumption of total enteral nutrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"98269"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis <i>vs</i> open anastomosis for ileostomy reversal in Crohn's disease: A single center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Wei-Hang Liu, Mao Xiong, Guo-Qing Chen, Zhui Long, Chao Xu, Li Zhu, Jing-Song Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.98269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an increased maturation of laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis techniques. However, research on its application for small bowel stoma reversal in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) is limited. Therefore, in this study, we compared the perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic intracorporeal ileostomy reversal (LIIR) and open ileostomy reversal (OIR).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the safety, feasibility, bowel function recovery, and short- and long-term LIIR and OIR outcomes in patients with CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients who underwent ileal reversal for CD between January 2021 and January 2023 at our institution. The baseline data, postoperative recovery, and complication indicators were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore factors that significantly influenced the development of enteral nutrition intolerance-related symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Notably, 15 of the 45 patients in this study underwent OIR, and the remaining 30 received LIIR. Notably, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding clinical baseline characteristics, operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, anastomotic site, enterolysis range, first postoperative flatus, postoperative complications, reoperation rate, or incidence of postoperative enteral nutrition intolerance. Compared with the OIR group, the LIIR group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (<i>P</i> = 0.045), lower incidence of enteral nutrition intolerance symptoms (<i>P</i> = 0.019), and earlier postoperative total enteral nutrition initiation (<i>P</i> = 0.033); however, it incurred higher total hospital costs (<i>P</i> = 0.038). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the duration of surgery and anastomotic technique were independent risk factors for postoperative symptoms of enteral nutrition intolerance (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for ileostomy reversal is safe and feasible. Patients who underwent this technique demonstrated improved tolerance to postoperative enteral nutrition and quicker resumption of total enteral nutrition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"98269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.98269\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.98269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis vs open anastomosis for ileostomy reversal in Crohn's disease: A single center retrospective study.
Background: There is an increased maturation of laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis techniques. However, research on its application for small bowel stoma reversal in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) is limited. Therefore, in this study, we compared the perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic intracorporeal ileostomy reversal (LIIR) and open ileostomy reversal (OIR).
Aim: To compare the safety, feasibility, bowel function recovery, and short- and long-term LIIR and OIR outcomes in patients with CD.
Methods: This study included patients who underwent ileal reversal for CD between January 2021 and January 2023 at our institution. The baseline data, postoperative recovery, and complication indicators were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore factors that significantly influenced the development of enteral nutrition intolerance-related symptoms.
Results: Notably, 15 of the 45 patients in this study underwent OIR, and the remaining 30 received LIIR. Notably, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding clinical baseline characteristics, operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, anastomotic site, enterolysis range, first postoperative flatus, postoperative complications, reoperation rate, or incidence of postoperative enteral nutrition intolerance. Compared with the OIR group, the LIIR group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.045), lower incidence of enteral nutrition intolerance symptoms (P = 0.019), and earlier postoperative total enteral nutrition initiation (P = 0.033); however, it incurred higher total hospital costs (P = 0.038). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the duration of surgery and anastomotic technique were independent risk factors for postoperative symptoms of enteral nutrition intolerance (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for ileostomy reversal is safe and feasible. Patients who underwent this technique demonstrated improved tolerance to postoperative enteral nutrition and quicker resumption of total enteral nutrition.