使用扩散基谱成像指标的人工智能模型准确预测临床意义的前列腺癌。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004456
Eric H Kim, Huaping Jing, Kainen L Utt, Joel M Vetter, R Cody Weimholt, Arnold D Bullock, Alexandra P Klim, Karla A Bergeron, Jason K Frankel, Zachary L Smith, Gerald L Andriole, Sheng-Kwei Song, Joseph E Ippolito
{"title":"使用扩散基谱成像指标的人工智能模型准确预测临床意义的前列腺癌。","authors":"Eric H Kim, Huaping Jing, Kainen L Utt, Joel M Vetter, R Cody Weimholt, Arnold D Bullock, Alexandra P Klim, Karla A Bergeron, Jason K Frankel, Zachary L Smith, Gerald L Andriole, Sheng-Kwei Song, Joseph E Ippolito","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conventional prostate magnetic resonance imaging has limited accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We performed diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) before biopsy and applied artificial intelligence models to these DBSI metrics to predict csPCa.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between February 2020 and March 2024, 241 patients underwent prostate MRI that included conventional and DBSI-specific sequences before prostate biopsy. We used artificial intelligence models with DBSI metrics as input classifiers and the biopsy pathology as the ground truth. The DBSI-based model was compared with available biomarkers (PSA, PSA density [PSAD], and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS]) for risk discrimination of csPCa defined as Gleason score <u>></u> 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DBSI-based model was an independent predictor of csPCa (odds ratio [OR] 2.04, 95% CI 1.52-2.73, <i>P</i> < .01), as were PSAD (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.21-3.35, <i>P</i> = .01) and PI-RADS classification (OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.37-11.6 for PI-RADS 3, <i>P</i> = .01; OR 9.67, 95% CI 2.89-32.7 for PI-RADS 4-5, <i>P</i> < .01), adjusting for age, family history, and race. Within our dataset, the DBSI-based model alone performed similarly to PSAD + PI-RADS (AUC 0.863 vs 0.859, <i>P</i> = .89), while the combination of the DBSI-based model + PI-RADS had the highest risk discrimination for csPCa (AUC 0.894, <i>P</i> < .01). A clinical strategy using the DBSI-based model for patients with PI-RADS 1-3 could have reduced biopsies by 27% while missing 2% of csPCa (compared with biopsy for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our DBSI-based artificial intelligence model accurately predicted csPCa on biopsy and can be combined with PI-RADS to potentially reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"777-785"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Artificial Intelligence Model Using Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging Metrics Accurately Predicts Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Eric H Kim, Huaping Jing, Kainen L Utt, Joel M Vetter, R Cody Weimholt, Arnold D Bullock, Alexandra P Klim, Karla A Bergeron, Jason K Frankel, Zachary L Smith, Gerald L Andriole, Sheng-Kwei Song, Joseph E Ippolito\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JU.0000000000004456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conventional prostate magnetic resonance imaging has limited accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We performed diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) before biopsy and applied artificial intelligence models to these DBSI metrics to predict csPCa.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between February 2020 and March 2024, 241 patients underwent prostate MRI that included conventional and DBSI-specific sequences before prostate biopsy. We used artificial intelligence models with DBSI metrics as input classifiers and the biopsy pathology as the ground truth. The DBSI-based model was compared with available biomarkers (PSA, PSA density [PSAD], and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS]) for risk discrimination of csPCa defined as Gleason score <u>></u> 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DBSI-based model was an independent predictor of csPCa (odds ratio [OR] 2.04, 95% CI 1.52-2.73, <i>P</i> < .01), as were PSAD (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.21-3.35, <i>P</i> = .01) and PI-RADS classification (OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.37-11.6 for PI-RADS 3, <i>P</i> = .01; OR 9.67, 95% CI 2.89-32.7 for PI-RADS 4-5, <i>P</i> < .01), adjusting for age, family history, and race. Within our dataset, the DBSI-based model alone performed similarly to PSAD + PI-RADS (AUC 0.863 vs 0.859, <i>P</i> = .89), while the combination of the DBSI-based model + PI-RADS had the highest risk discrimination for csPCa (AUC 0.894, <i>P</i> < .01). A clinical strategy using the DBSI-based model for patients with PI-RADS 1-3 could have reduced biopsies by 27% while missing 2% of csPCa (compared with biopsy for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our DBSI-based artificial intelligence model accurately predicted csPCa on biopsy and can be combined with PI-RADS to potentially reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"777-785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064362/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004456\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:常规前列腺磁共振成像对临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的准确性有限。我们在活检之前进行了扩散基谱成像(DBSI),并将人工智能模型应用于这些DBSI指标来预测csPCa。材料和方法:在2020年2月至2024年3月期间,241名患者在前列腺活检前接受了前列腺MRI,包括常规和dbsi特异性序列。我们使用带有dbsi指标的人工智能模型作为输入分类器,并将活检病理作为基础事实。将基于dbsi的模型与可用的生物标志物(PSA、PSA密度和PI-RADS)进行比较,以区分csPCa的风险,并将其定义为Gleason评分为bb70。结果:基于dbsi的模型是csPCa的独立预测因子(OR 2.04, 95%CI 1.52-2.73)。结论:基于dbsi的人工智能模型可以准确预测活检时的csPCa,并且可以与PI-RADS联合使用,潜在地减少不必要的前列腺活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Artificial Intelligence Model Using Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging Metrics Accurately Predicts Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Purpose: Conventional prostate magnetic resonance imaging has limited accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We performed diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) before biopsy and applied artificial intelligence models to these DBSI metrics to predict csPCa.

Materials and methods: Between February 2020 and March 2024, 241 patients underwent prostate MRI that included conventional and DBSI-specific sequences before prostate biopsy. We used artificial intelligence models with DBSI metrics as input classifiers and the biopsy pathology as the ground truth. The DBSI-based model was compared with available biomarkers (PSA, PSA density [PSAD], and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS]) for risk discrimination of csPCa defined as Gleason score > 7.

Results: The DBSI-based model was an independent predictor of csPCa (odds ratio [OR] 2.04, 95% CI 1.52-2.73, P < .01), as were PSAD (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.21-3.35, P = .01) and PI-RADS classification (OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.37-11.6 for PI-RADS 3, P = .01; OR 9.67, 95% CI 2.89-32.7 for PI-RADS 4-5, P < .01), adjusting for age, family history, and race. Within our dataset, the DBSI-based model alone performed similarly to PSAD + PI-RADS (AUC 0.863 vs 0.859, P = .89), while the combination of the DBSI-based model + PI-RADS had the highest risk discrimination for csPCa (AUC 0.894, P < .01). A clinical strategy using the DBSI-based model for patients with PI-RADS 1-3 could have reduced biopsies by 27% while missing 2% of csPCa (compared with biopsy for all).

Conclusions: Our DBSI-based artificial intelligence model accurately predicted csPCa on biopsy and can be combined with PI-RADS to potentially reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信