处理 Woven EndoBridge 装置栓塞术后残留和复发性动脉瘤:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Vinay Jaikumar, Jaims Lim, Matthew D Moser, Bernard Okai, Hendrick Francois, Ana E Cadar, Muhammad Waqas, Andre Monteiro, Pui Man Rosalind Lai, Jason M Davies, Kenneth V Snyder, Elad I Levy, Adnan H Siddiqui
{"title":"处理 Woven EndoBridge 装置栓塞术后残留和复发性动脉瘤:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Vinay Jaikumar, Jaims Lim, Matthew D Moser, Bernard Okai, Hendrick Francois, Ana E Cadar, Muhammad Waqas, Andre Monteiro, Pui Man Rosalind Lai, Jason M Davies, Kenneth V Snyder, Elad I Levy, Adnan H Siddiqui","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early literature on the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device reported 80-90% adequate aneurysm occlusion but low complete occlusion (40-55%). It is uncertain whether residual or recurrent aneurysms require re-treatment to prevent future rupture.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the literature to meta-analyze occlusion and complication rates after re-treatment of these aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and EMBASE were queried for 're-treatment' of 'recurrent' or 'residual' aneurysms treated with the WEB device. Studies reporting strategies and outcomes were included. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, outcomes, and complications were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted on variables reported by three or more studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 15 studies of 220 patients (220 aneurysms) with a mean age of 57.8 years (95% CI 55.1 to 60.7 years). At baseline, 42.8% (95% CI 35% to 51%) of aneurysms were ruptured, had a mean 8.6 mm dome (95% CI 7.3 to 10 mm) and a mean 5.2 mm neck (95% CI 4.7 to 5.7 mm), and 69.85% were at bifurcations (95% CI 47.63% to 85.51%). At mean 11.2 months' follow-up (95% CI 8 to 15.6 months), 75.9% (95% CI 66.1% to 83.5%) had residual dome filling, predominantly from incomplete occlusion in 84.7% of cases (95% CI 66.6% to 93.9%). Endovascular management was used in 82.5% (95% CI 72.6% to 89.3%) of recurrences, with stent-assisted or flow diverter-assisted coil embolization being used in 42.4% (95% CI 32.7% to 52.8%). Overall, complication rates were 8.9% (95% CI 4.9% to 15.6%) thromboembolic and 8% (95% CI 4.3% to 14.2%) device-related. Complete angiographic occlusion after re-treatment was achieved in 64.1% (95% CI 52.6% to 74.2%), of patients, with 15.2% (95% CI 8.8% to 24.9%) requiring additional re-treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review reports excellent safety and modest occlusion outcomes with re-treatment of recurrent or residual aneurysms post-WEB embolization. Outcomes with observational management of residual or recurrent aneurysms are lacking, questioning the requirement for re-treatment. Endovascular strategies demonstrated excellent safety and additional re-treatment rates, highlighting their expanding role in post-WEB recurrences.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing residual and recurrent aneurysms post-Woven EndoBridge device embolization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Vinay Jaikumar, Jaims Lim, Matthew D Moser, Bernard Okai, Hendrick Francois, Ana E Cadar, Muhammad Waqas, Andre Monteiro, Pui Man Rosalind Lai, Jason M Davies, Kenneth V Snyder, Elad I Levy, Adnan H Siddiqui\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2024-022812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early literature on the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device reported 80-90% adequate aneurysm occlusion but low complete occlusion (40-55%). It is uncertain whether residual or recurrent aneurysms require re-treatment to prevent future rupture.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the literature to meta-analyze occlusion and complication rates after re-treatment of these aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and EMBASE were queried for 're-treatment' of 'recurrent' or 'residual' aneurysms treated with the WEB device. Studies reporting strategies and outcomes were included. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, outcomes, and complications were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted on variables reported by three or more studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 15 studies of 220 patients (220 aneurysms) with a mean age of 57.8 years (95% CI 55.1 to 60.7 years). At baseline, 42.8% (95% CI 35% to 51%) of aneurysms were ruptured, had a mean 8.6 mm dome (95% CI 7.3 to 10 mm) and a mean 5.2 mm neck (95% CI 4.7 to 5.7 mm), and 69.85% were at bifurcations (95% CI 47.63% to 85.51%). At mean 11.2 months' follow-up (95% CI 8 to 15.6 months), 75.9% (95% CI 66.1% to 83.5%) had residual dome filling, predominantly from incomplete occlusion in 84.7% of cases (95% CI 66.6% to 93.9%). Endovascular management was used in 82.5% (95% CI 72.6% to 89.3%) of recurrences, with stent-assisted or flow diverter-assisted coil embolization being used in 42.4% (95% CI 32.7% to 52.8%). Overall, complication rates were 8.9% (95% CI 4.9% to 15.6%) thromboembolic and 8% (95% CI 4.3% to 14.2%) device-related. Complete angiographic occlusion after re-treatment was achieved in 64.1% (95% CI 52.6% to 74.2%), of patients, with 15.2% (95% CI 8.8% to 24.9%) requiring additional re-treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review reports excellent safety and modest occlusion outcomes with re-treatment of recurrent or residual aneurysms post-WEB embolization. Outcomes with observational management of residual or recurrent aneurysms are lacking, questioning the requirement for re-treatment. Endovascular strategies demonstrated excellent safety and additional re-treatment rates, highlighting their expanding role in post-WEB recurrences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022812\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022812","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于 Woven EndoBridge(WEB)装置的早期文献报道,动脉瘤的充分闭塞率为 80-90%,但完全闭塞率较低(40-55%)。目前尚不确定残余或复发性动脉瘤是否需要再次治疗以防止未来破裂:系统回顾文献,对这些动脉瘤再次治疗后的闭塞率和并发症发生率进行元分析:方法:在 PubMed 和 EMBASE 中搜索使用 WEB 装置治疗的 "复发性 "或 "残余 "动脉瘤的 "再治疗"。纳入了报告策略和结果的研究。提取了患者和动脉瘤的特征、结果和并发症。对三项或三项以上研究报告的变量进行元分析:我们纳入了 15 项研究,涉及 220 名患者(220 个动脉瘤),平均年龄为 57.8 岁(95% CI 55.1 至 60.7 岁)。基线时,42.8%(95% CI 为 35% 至 51%)的动脉瘤破裂,穹顶平均为 8.6 毫米(95% CI 为 7.3 至 10 毫米),颈部平均为 5.2 毫米(95% CI 为 4.7 至 5.7 毫米),69.85% 的动脉瘤位于分叉处(95% CI 为 47.63% 至 85.51%)。在平均 11.2 个月的随访中(95% CI 8 至 15.6 个月),75.9%(95% CI 66.1% 至 83.5%)的病例有残余穹隆充盈,其中 84.7% 的病例(95% CI 66.6% 至 93.9%)主要是由于不完全闭塞造成的。82.5%(95% CI 72.6% 至 89.3%)的复发病例采用了血管内治疗,42.4%(95% CI 32.7% 至 52.8%)的复发病例采用了支架辅助或血流分流器辅助线圈栓塞治疗。总体而言,血栓栓塞并发症发生率为 8.9%(95% CI 为 4.9% 至 15.6%),设备相关并发症发生率为 8%(95% CI 为 4.3% 至 14.2%)。64.1%(95% CI 52.6%至74.2%)的患者在再次治疗后实现了血管造影完全闭塞,15.2%(95% CI 8.8%至24.9%)的患者需要再次治疗:我们的研究报告显示,WEB栓塞术后复发或残余动脉瘤的再治疗安全性极高,闭塞效果也很好。残余或复发性动脉瘤的观察管理结果尚不明确,这对再次治疗的要求提出了质疑。血管内治疗策略具有极佳的安全性和更高的再治疗率,这凸显了血管内治疗策略在WEB术后复发中不断扩大的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing residual and recurrent aneurysms post-Woven EndoBridge device embolization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Early literature on the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device reported 80-90% adequate aneurysm occlusion but low complete occlusion (40-55%). It is uncertain whether residual or recurrent aneurysms require re-treatment to prevent future rupture.

Objective: To systematically review the literature to meta-analyze occlusion and complication rates after re-treatment of these aneurysms.

Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were queried for 're-treatment' of 'recurrent' or 'residual' aneurysms treated with the WEB device. Studies reporting strategies and outcomes were included. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, outcomes, and complications were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted on variables reported by three or more studies.

Results: We included 15 studies of 220 patients (220 aneurysms) with a mean age of 57.8 years (95% CI 55.1 to 60.7 years). At baseline, 42.8% (95% CI 35% to 51%) of aneurysms were ruptured, had a mean 8.6 mm dome (95% CI 7.3 to 10 mm) and a mean 5.2 mm neck (95% CI 4.7 to 5.7 mm), and 69.85% were at bifurcations (95% CI 47.63% to 85.51%). At mean 11.2 months' follow-up (95% CI 8 to 15.6 months), 75.9% (95% CI 66.1% to 83.5%) had residual dome filling, predominantly from incomplete occlusion in 84.7% of cases (95% CI 66.6% to 93.9%). Endovascular management was used in 82.5% (95% CI 72.6% to 89.3%) of recurrences, with stent-assisted or flow diverter-assisted coil embolization being used in 42.4% (95% CI 32.7% to 52.8%). Overall, complication rates were 8.9% (95% CI 4.9% to 15.6%) thromboembolic and 8% (95% CI 4.3% to 14.2%) device-related. Complete angiographic occlusion after re-treatment was achieved in 64.1% (95% CI 52.6% to 74.2%), of patients, with 15.2% (95% CI 8.8% to 24.9%) requiring additional re-treatment.

Conclusion: Our review reports excellent safety and modest occlusion outcomes with re-treatment of recurrent or residual aneurysms post-WEB embolization. Outcomes with observational management of residual or recurrent aneurysms are lacking, questioning the requirement for re-treatment. Endovascular strategies demonstrated excellent safety and additional re-treatment rates, highlighting their expanding role in post-WEB recurrences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信