{"title":"Unsupervised machine learning model for phenogroup-based stratification in acute type A aortic dissection to identify postoperative acute gastrointestinal injury.","authors":"Yuhu Ma, Xiaofang Yang, Chenxiang Weng, Xiaoqing Wang, Baoping Zhang, Ying Liu, Rui Wang, Zhenxing Bao, Peining Yang, Hong Zhang, Yatao Liu","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1514751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to explore the application value of unsupervised machine learning in identifying acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) after extracorporeal circulation for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent extracorporeal circulation for ATAAD at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from January 2016 to January 2021 were included. Unsupervised machine learning algorithm was used to stratify patients into different phenogroups according to the similarity of their clinical features and laboratory test results. The differences in the incidence of perioperative AGI and other adverse events among different phenogroups were compared. Logistic regression was used to analyze the high-risk factors for AGI in each phenogroups and random forest (RF) algorithms were used to construct diagnostic models for AGI in different phenogroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 188 patients were included, with 166 males and 22 females. Unsupervised Machine Learning stratified patients into three phenogroups (phenogroup A, B, and C). Compared with other phenogroups, phenogroup B patients were older (<i>P</i> < 0.01), had higher preoperative lactate and D-dimer levels, and had the highest incidence of AGI (52.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (18.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.002). The random forest model showed that the top four risk factors for AGI in phenogroup B were cardiopulmonary bypass time, operation time, aortic clamping time, and ventilator time, which were significantly different from other phenogroups. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for diagnosing postoperative AGI of phenogroup A, B, and C were 0.943 (0.854-0.992), 0.990 (0.966-1.000), and 0.964 (0.899-0.997) using the RF model, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phenogroup stratification based on unsupervised learning can accurately identify high-risk populations for postoperative AGI in ATAAD, providing a new approach for implementing individualized preventive and therapeutic measures in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1514751"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1514751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的旨在探讨无监督机器学习在识别急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)体外循环后急性胃肠道损伤(AGI)中的应用价值:方法:纳入2016年1月至2021年1月在兰州大学第一医院接受体外循环治疗ATAAD的患者。根据患者临床特征和实验室检查结果的相似性,采用无监督机器学习算法将患者分为不同的表型组。比较了不同表型组围手术期AGI和其他不良事件发生率的差异。采用逻辑回归分析各表型中AGI的高危因素,并采用随机森林(RF)算法构建不同表型的AGI诊断模型:共纳入 188 名患者,其中男性 166 名,女性 22 名。无监督机器学习将患者分为三个表型组(表型组 A、B 和 C)。与其他表型组相比,表型组 B 患者年龄较大(P P P = 0.002)。随机森林模型显示,表型组 B AGI 的前四个风险因素分别是心肺旁路时间、手术时间、主动脉夹闭时间和呼吸机时间,与其他表型组有显著差异。使用 RF 模型诊断表型 A、B 和 C 的术后 AGI 的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.943(0.854-0.992)、0.990(0.966-1.000)和 0.964(0.899-0.997):基于无监督学习的症状组分层可以准确识别ATAAD术后AGI的高危人群,为临床实践中实施个体化预防和治疗措施提供了一种新方法。
Unsupervised machine learning model for phenogroup-based stratification in acute type A aortic dissection to identify postoperative acute gastrointestinal injury.
Objective: We aimed to explore the application value of unsupervised machine learning in identifying acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) after extracorporeal circulation for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).
Methods: Patients who underwent extracorporeal circulation for ATAAD at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from January 2016 to January 2021 were included. Unsupervised machine learning algorithm was used to stratify patients into different phenogroups according to the similarity of their clinical features and laboratory test results. The differences in the incidence of perioperative AGI and other adverse events among different phenogroups were compared. Logistic regression was used to analyze the high-risk factors for AGI in each phenogroups and random forest (RF) algorithms were used to construct diagnostic models for AGI in different phenogroups.
Results: A total of 188 patients were included, with 166 males and 22 females. Unsupervised Machine Learning stratified patients into three phenogroups (phenogroup A, B, and C). Compared with other phenogroups, phenogroup B patients were older (P < 0.01), had higher preoperative lactate and D-dimer levels, and had the highest incidence of AGI (52.5%, P < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (18.6%, P = 0.002). The random forest model showed that the top four risk factors for AGI in phenogroup B were cardiopulmonary bypass time, operation time, aortic clamping time, and ventilator time, which were significantly different from other phenogroups. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for diagnosing postoperative AGI of phenogroup A, B, and C were 0.943 (0.854-0.992), 0.990 (0.966-1.000), and 0.964 (0.899-0.997) using the RF model, respectively.
Conclusion: Phenogroup stratification based on unsupervised learning can accurately identify high-risk populations for postoperative AGI in ATAAD, providing a new approach for implementing individualized preventive and therapeutic measures in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers?
At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.