产后头 6 个月的胰岛素自动给药(AiDAPT):预设扩展研究

IF 44 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Tara T M Lee, Corinne Collett, Simon Bergford, Sara Hartnell, Eleanor M Scott, Robert S Lindsay, Katharine F Hunt, David R McCance, Rebecca M Reynolds, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Judy Sibayan, Craig Kollman, Roman Hovorka, Helen R Murphy
{"title":"产后头 6 个月的胰岛素自动给药(AiDAPT):预设扩展研究","authors":"Tara T M Lee, Corinne Collett, Simon Bergford, Sara Hartnell, Eleanor M Scott, Robert S Lindsay, Katharine F Hunt, David R McCance, Rebecca M Reynolds, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Judy Sibayan, Craig Kollman, Roman Hovorka, Helen R Murphy","doi":"10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00340-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Clinical guidelines in the UK and elsewhere do not specifically address hybrid closed loop (HCL) use in the postpartum period when the demands of caring for a newborn are paramount. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HCL use during the first 6 months postpartum compared with standard care.<h3>Methods</h3>In this prespecified extension to a multicentre, randomised controlled trial, pregnant women with type 1 diabetes at nine UK sites were followed up for 6 months postpartum. Eligible participants (AiDAPT participants recruited after the implementation of the postpartum protocol amendment approval, those still pregnant or within six months of delivery at the time of amendment implementation and still using HCL or continuous glucose monitoring [CGM] therapy) continued their randomly assigned treatment, either standard insulin therapy with CGM or HCL therapy (CamAPS FX system version 0.3.1, CamDiab, Cambridge, UK). Participants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio with stratification by clinical site using randomly permuted block sizes of 2 or 4. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in percentage time in range ([TIR] 3·9–10·0 mmol/L [70–180mg/dL]), measured during the periods of month 0 up to 3, months 3 to 6, and over 6 months postpartum. The study is registered at <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span> (ISRCTN56898625) and is complete.<h3>Findings</h3>Of the 124 AiDAPT trial participants, 66 (53%) were ineligible for inclusion in the postpartum extension, and 57 participants consented to continue their treatment per original random allocation. The mean age was 31 years (SD 4), and all participants had early pregnancy HbA<sub>1c</sub> 59·4 mmol/mol (SD 10·5 [7·6% SD 1·0%]). In the 6 months postpartum, mean time with glucose levels within the target range was higher in the HCL group compared with the standard care group (72% [SD 12%] <em>vs</em> 54% [17%]), with an adjusted treatment difference of 15% (95% CI 7 to 22). Results for hyperglycaemia (&gt;10·0 mmol/L) and mean CGM glucose also favoured HCL (–14% [95% CI –23% to –6%] and –1·3 mmol/L [–2·3 to –0·3], respectively). Hypoglycaemia rates were low, with no between-group differences (2·4% <em>vs</em> 2·6%). There were no treatment effect changes depending on postpartum period (0 up to 3 months <em>vs</em> 3 to 6 months) and no unanticipated safety problems.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Participants in the HCL group maintained 70% TIR during the first 6 months postpartum, supporting continued use of HCL rather than standard insulin therapy for people with diabetes once they have given birth.<h3>Funding</h3>National Institute for Health Research, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, and Diabetes Research &amp; Wellness Foundation. CGM devices were provided by Dexcom at a discounted price.","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":44.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated insulin delivery during the first 6 months postpartum (AiDAPT): a prespecified extension study\",\"authors\":\"Tara T M Lee, Corinne Collett, Simon Bergford, Sara Hartnell, Eleanor M Scott, Robert S Lindsay, Katharine F Hunt, David R McCance, Rebecca M Reynolds, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Judy Sibayan, Craig Kollman, Roman Hovorka, Helen R Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00340-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>Clinical guidelines in the UK and elsewhere do not specifically address hybrid closed loop (HCL) use in the postpartum period when the demands of caring for a newborn are paramount. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HCL use during the first 6 months postpartum compared with standard care.<h3>Methods</h3>In this prespecified extension to a multicentre, randomised controlled trial, pregnant women with type 1 diabetes at nine UK sites were followed up for 6 months postpartum. Eligible participants (AiDAPT participants recruited after the implementation of the postpartum protocol amendment approval, those still pregnant or within six months of delivery at the time of amendment implementation and still using HCL or continuous glucose monitoring [CGM] therapy) continued their randomly assigned treatment, either standard insulin therapy with CGM or HCL therapy (CamAPS FX system version 0.3.1, CamDiab, Cambridge, UK). Participants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio with stratification by clinical site using randomly permuted block sizes of 2 or 4. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in percentage time in range ([TIR] 3·9–10·0 mmol/L [70–180mg/dL]), measured during the periods of month 0 up to 3, months 3 to 6, and over 6 months postpartum. The study is registered at <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span> (ISRCTN56898625) and is complete.<h3>Findings</h3>Of the 124 AiDAPT trial participants, 66 (53%) were ineligible for inclusion in the postpartum extension, and 57 participants consented to continue their treatment per original random allocation. The mean age was 31 years (SD 4), and all participants had early pregnancy HbA<sub>1c</sub> 59·4 mmol/mol (SD 10·5 [7·6% SD 1·0%]). In the 6 months postpartum, mean time with glucose levels within the target range was higher in the HCL group compared with the standard care group (72% [SD 12%] <em>vs</em> 54% [17%]), with an adjusted treatment difference of 15% (95% CI 7 to 22). Results for hyperglycaemia (&gt;10·0 mmol/L) and mean CGM glucose also favoured HCL (–14% [95% CI –23% to –6%] and –1·3 mmol/L [–2·3 to –0·3], respectively). Hypoglycaemia rates were low, with no between-group differences (2·4% <em>vs</em> 2·6%). There were no treatment effect changes depending on postpartum period (0 up to 3 months <em>vs</em> 3 to 6 months) and no unanticipated safety problems.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Participants in the HCL group maintained 70% TIR during the first 6 months postpartum, supporting continued use of HCL rather than standard insulin therapy for people with diabetes once they have given birth.<h3>Funding</h3>National Institute for Health Research, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, and Diabetes Research &amp; Wellness Foundation. CGM devices were provided by Dexcom at a discounted price.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":44.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00340-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00340-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated insulin delivery during the first 6 months postpartum (AiDAPT): a prespecified extension study

Background

Clinical guidelines in the UK and elsewhere do not specifically address hybrid closed loop (HCL) use in the postpartum period when the demands of caring for a newborn are paramount. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HCL use during the first 6 months postpartum compared with standard care.

Methods

In this prespecified extension to a multicentre, randomised controlled trial, pregnant women with type 1 diabetes at nine UK sites were followed up for 6 months postpartum. Eligible participants (AiDAPT participants recruited after the implementation of the postpartum protocol amendment approval, those still pregnant or within six months of delivery at the time of amendment implementation and still using HCL or continuous glucose monitoring [CGM] therapy) continued their randomly assigned treatment, either standard insulin therapy with CGM or HCL therapy (CamAPS FX system version 0.3.1, CamDiab, Cambridge, UK). Participants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio with stratification by clinical site using randomly permuted block sizes of 2 or 4. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in percentage time in range ([TIR] 3·9–10·0 mmol/L [70–180mg/dL]), measured during the periods of month 0 up to 3, months 3 to 6, and over 6 months postpartum. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ISRCTN56898625) and is complete.

Findings

Of the 124 AiDAPT trial participants, 66 (53%) were ineligible for inclusion in the postpartum extension, and 57 participants consented to continue their treatment per original random allocation. The mean age was 31 years (SD 4), and all participants had early pregnancy HbA1c 59·4 mmol/mol (SD 10·5 [7·6% SD 1·0%]). In the 6 months postpartum, mean time with glucose levels within the target range was higher in the HCL group compared with the standard care group (72% [SD 12%] vs 54% [17%]), with an adjusted treatment difference of 15% (95% CI 7 to 22). Results for hyperglycaemia (>10·0 mmol/L) and mean CGM glucose also favoured HCL (–14% [95% CI –23% to –6%] and –1·3 mmol/L [–2·3 to –0·3], respectively). Hypoglycaemia rates were low, with no between-group differences (2·4% vs 2·6%). There were no treatment effect changes depending on postpartum period (0 up to 3 months vs 3 to 6 months) and no unanticipated safety problems.

Interpretation

Participants in the HCL group maintained 70% TIR during the first 6 months postpartum, supporting continued use of HCL rather than standard insulin therapy for people with diabetes once they have given birth.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, and Diabetes Research & Wellness Foundation. CGM devices were provided by Dexcom at a discounted price.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
61.50
自引率
1.60%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, an independent journal with a global perspective and strong clinical focus, features original clinical research, expert reviews, news, and opinion pieces in each monthly issue. Covering topics like diabetes, obesity, nutrition, and more, the journal provides insights into clinical advances and practice-changing research worldwide. It welcomes original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice, as well as informative reviews on related topics, especially those with global health importance and relevance to low-income and middle-income countries. The journal publishes various content types, including Articles, Reviews, Comments, Correspondence, Health Policy, and Personal Views, along with Series and Commissions aiming to drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in diabetes and endocrinology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信