N.V. Prajna MD , Jad Assaf MD , Nisha R. Acharya MD, MS , Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer MD , Thomas M. Lietman MD , J. Peter Campbell MD, MPH , Jeremy D. Keenan MD, MPH , Xubo Song PhD , Travis K. Redd MD, MPH
{"title":"使用前瞻性代表性数据鉴别细菌性和真菌性角膜炎的多模态深度学习。","authors":"N.V. Prajna MD , Jad Assaf MD , Nisha R. Acharya MD, MS , Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer MD , Thomas M. Lietman MD , J. Peter Campbell MD, MPH , Jeremy D. Keenan MD, MPH , Xubo Song PhD , Travis K. Redd MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study develops and evaluates multimodal machine learning models for differentiating bacterial and fungal keratitis using a prospective representative dataset from South India.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Machine learning classifier training and validation study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Five hundred ninety-nine subjects diagnosed with acute infectious keratitis at Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed and compared 3 prediction models to distinguish bacterial and fungal keratitis using a prospective, consecutively-collected, representative dataset gathered over a full calendar year (the MADURAI dataset). These models included a clinical data model, a computer vision model using the EfficientNet architecture, and a multimodal model combining both imaging and clinical data. We partitioned the MADURAI dataset into 70% train/validation and 30% test sets. Model training was performed with fivefold cross-validation. We also compared the performance of the MADURAI-trained computer vision model against a model with identical architecture but trained on a preexisting dataset collated from multiple prior bacterial and fungal keratitis randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (the RCT-trained computer vision model).</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The primary evaluation metric was the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Secondary metrics included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, and F1 score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The MADURAI-trained computer vision model outperformed the clinical data model and the RCT-trained computer vision model on the hold-out test set, with an AUPRC 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.92–0.96), AUROC 0.81 (0.76–0.85), accuracy 77%, and F1 score 0.85. The multimodal model did not substantially improve performance compared with the computer vision model.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The best-performing machine learning classifier for infectious keratitis was a computer vision model trained using the MADURAI dataset. These findings suggest that image-based deep learning could significantly enhance diagnostic capabilities for infectious keratitis and emphasize the importance of using prospective, consecutively-collected, representative data for machine learning model training and evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100665"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal Deep Learning for Differentiating Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis Using Prospective Representative Data\",\"authors\":\"N.V. Prajna MD , Jad Assaf MD , Nisha R. Acharya MD, MS , Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer MD , Thomas M. Lietman MD , J. Peter Campbell MD, MPH , Jeremy D. Keenan MD, MPH , Xubo Song PhD , Travis K. Redd MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study develops and evaluates multimodal machine learning models for differentiating bacterial and fungal keratitis using a prospective representative dataset from South India.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Machine learning classifier training and validation study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Five hundred ninety-nine subjects diagnosed with acute infectious keratitis at Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed and compared 3 prediction models to distinguish bacterial and fungal keratitis using a prospective, consecutively-collected, representative dataset gathered over a full calendar year (the MADURAI dataset). These models included a clinical data model, a computer vision model using the EfficientNet architecture, and a multimodal model combining both imaging and clinical data. We partitioned the MADURAI dataset into 70% train/validation and 30% test sets. Model training was performed with fivefold cross-validation. We also compared the performance of the MADURAI-trained computer vision model against a model with identical architecture but trained on a preexisting dataset collated from multiple prior bacterial and fungal keratitis randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (the RCT-trained computer vision model).</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The primary evaluation metric was the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Secondary metrics included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, and F1 score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The MADURAI-trained computer vision model outperformed the clinical data model and the RCT-trained computer vision model on the hold-out test set, with an AUPRC 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.92–0.96), AUROC 0.81 (0.76–0.85), accuracy 77%, and F1 score 0.85. The multimodal model did not substantially improve performance compared with the computer vision model.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The best-performing machine learning classifier for infectious keratitis was a computer vision model trained using the MADURAI dataset. These findings suggest that image-based deep learning could significantly enhance diagnostic capabilities for infectious keratitis and emphasize the importance of using prospective, consecutively-collected, representative data for machine learning model training and evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758206/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691452400201X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691452400201X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multimodal Deep Learning for Differentiating Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis Using Prospective Representative Data
Objective
This study develops and evaluates multimodal machine learning models for differentiating bacterial and fungal keratitis using a prospective representative dataset from South India.
Design
Machine learning classifier training and validation study.
Participants
Five hundred ninety-nine subjects diagnosed with acute infectious keratitis at Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India.
Methods
We developed and compared 3 prediction models to distinguish bacterial and fungal keratitis using a prospective, consecutively-collected, representative dataset gathered over a full calendar year (the MADURAI dataset). These models included a clinical data model, a computer vision model using the EfficientNet architecture, and a multimodal model combining both imaging and clinical data. We partitioned the MADURAI dataset into 70% train/validation and 30% test sets. Model training was performed with fivefold cross-validation. We also compared the performance of the MADURAI-trained computer vision model against a model with identical architecture but trained on a preexisting dataset collated from multiple prior bacterial and fungal keratitis randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (the RCT-trained computer vision model).
Main Outcome Measures
The primary evaluation metric was the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Secondary metrics included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, and F1 score.
Results
The MADURAI-trained computer vision model outperformed the clinical data model and the RCT-trained computer vision model on the hold-out test set, with an AUPRC 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.92–0.96), AUROC 0.81 (0.76–0.85), accuracy 77%, and F1 score 0.85. The multimodal model did not substantially improve performance compared with the computer vision model.
Conclusions
The best-performing machine learning classifier for infectious keratitis was a computer vision model trained using the MADURAI dataset. These findings suggest that image-based deep learning could significantly enhance diagnostic capabilities for infectious keratitis and emphasize the importance of using prospective, consecutively-collected, representative data for machine learning model training and evaluation.
Financial Disclosure(s)
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.