采用韦氏信数序列的信数跨度作为嵌入效度指标用于青少年运动员脑震荡基线测试。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2025.2452294
Daniel Baldini, John-Christopher A Finley, Ashlynn Steinbaugh, Annie Lakhani, Aubrey L Deneen, Henry S Eve, Julius H Flowers, Raquel L Borg, Rayna B Hirst
{"title":"采用韦氏信数序列的信数跨度作为嵌入效度指标用于青少年运动员脑震荡基线测试。","authors":"Daniel Baldini, John-Christopher A Finley, Ashlynn Steinbaugh, Annie Lakhani, Aubrey L Deneen, Henry S Eve, Julius H Flowers, Raquel L Borg, Rayna B Hirst","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2452294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Few performance validity tests exist for youth undergoing baseline testing for the management of sport-related concussion. This study provides an initial validation of a reliable span calculation from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition Letter-Number Sequencing (LNS) subtest as a performance validity indicator for youth baseline testing (Reliable Letter-Number Span; RLNS). <b>Method:</b> Youth athletes (<i>n</i> = 173) underwent baseline concussion testing for the management of sport-related concussion. We classified participants as valid (<i>n</i> = 153) or invalid performance (<i>n</i> = 20) based on several well-established performance validity tests. We calculated RLNS by summing the spans of alphanumeric characters across two items within the Letter-Number Sequencing subtest, similar to the Reliable Digit Span. To better determine the utility of RLNS, we also examined other novel reliable span metrics and established summary scores from the Letter-Number Sequencing as potential validity indicators. <b>Results:</b> Analyses revealed excellent classification accuracy for RLNS, with an area under the curve of .88 (95% CI [.81, .96]). The optimal cutoff for RLNS (≤6) yielded .55 sensitivity and .95 specificity. Results showed similar but slightly lower classification accuracy statistics (areas under the curve of .77-.86) for the other LNS validity indicators. <b>Conclusion:</b> Initial findings support the criterion validity of RLNS as an embedded validity indicator. This measure is among the few extant performance validity tests that may be appropriate for youth baseline concussion testing. RLNS may also be appropriate for other types of pediatric evaluations. However, additional support is necessary before neuropsychologists can use RLNS clinically.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1979-1995"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a novel Reliable Letter-Number Span from the Wechsler Letter-Number Sequencing as an embedded validity indicator in baseline concussion testing for youth athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Baldini, John-Christopher A Finley, Ashlynn Steinbaugh, Annie Lakhani, Aubrey L Deneen, Henry S Eve, Julius H Flowers, Raquel L Borg, Rayna B Hirst\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2025.2452294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Few performance validity tests exist for youth undergoing baseline testing for the management of sport-related concussion. This study provides an initial validation of a reliable span calculation from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition Letter-Number Sequencing (LNS) subtest as a performance validity indicator for youth baseline testing (Reliable Letter-Number Span; RLNS). <b>Method:</b> Youth athletes (<i>n</i> = 173) underwent baseline concussion testing for the management of sport-related concussion. We classified participants as valid (<i>n</i> = 153) or invalid performance (<i>n</i> = 20) based on several well-established performance validity tests. We calculated RLNS by summing the spans of alphanumeric characters across two items within the Letter-Number Sequencing subtest, similar to the Reliable Digit Span. To better determine the utility of RLNS, we also examined other novel reliable span metrics and established summary scores from the Letter-Number Sequencing as potential validity indicators. <b>Results:</b> Analyses revealed excellent classification accuracy for RLNS, with an area under the curve of .88 (95% CI [.81, .96]). The optimal cutoff for RLNS (≤6) yielded .55 sensitivity and .95 specificity. Results showed similar but slightly lower classification accuracy statistics (areas under the curve of .77-.86) for the other LNS validity indicators. <b>Conclusion:</b> Initial findings support the criterion validity of RLNS as an embedded validity indicator. This measure is among the few extant performance validity tests that may be appropriate for youth baseline concussion testing. RLNS may also be appropriate for other types of pediatric evaluations. However, additional support is necessary before neuropsychologists can use RLNS clinically.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1979-1995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2452294\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2452294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对青少年进行运动相关脑震荡治疗基线测试的效能效度测试很少。本研究初步验证了韦氏儿童智力量表-第四版字母-数字排序(LNS)子测试的可靠跨度计算作为青少年基线测试的绩效效度指标(可靠字母-数字跨度;RLNS)。方法:173名青年运动员接受了基线脑震荡测试,以治疗运动相关脑震荡。我们将参与者分为有效(n = 153)或无效的表现(n = 20)基于几个既定的性能效度测试。我们通过将字母数字序列子测试中两个项目的字母数字字符跨度相加来计算RLNS,类似于可靠数字跨度。为了更好地确定RLNS的效用,我们还研究了其他新的可靠跨度指标,并从字母-数字排序中建立了总结分数作为潜在的有效性指标。结果:分析显示RLNS的分类准确率很高,曲线下面积为0.88 (95% CI)。81 .96点)。RLNS(≤6)的最佳截止值灵敏度为0.55,特异性为0.95。结果显示,其他LNS效度指标的分类准确率统计数据相似,但略低(曲线下面积为0.77 - 0.86)。结论:初步研究结果支持RLNS的标准效度作为嵌入效度指标。这项措施是少数现存的效能效度测试之一,可能适用于青少年基线脑震荡测试。RLNS也可能适用于其他类型的儿科评估。然而,在神经心理学家在临床上使用RLNS之前,需要额外的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using a novel Reliable Letter-Number Span from the Wechsler Letter-Number Sequencing as an embedded validity indicator in baseline concussion testing for youth athletes.

Objective: Few performance validity tests exist for youth undergoing baseline testing for the management of sport-related concussion. This study provides an initial validation of a reliable span calculation from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition Letter-Number Sequencing (LNS) subtest as a performance validity indicator for youth baseline testing (Reliable Letter-Number Span; RLNS). Method: Youth athletes (n = 173) underwent baseline concussion testing for the management of sport-related concussion. We classified participants as valid (n = 153) or invalid performance (n = 20) based on several well-established performance validity tests. We calculated RLNS by summing the spans of alphanumeric characters across two items within the Letter-Number Sequencing subtest, similar to the Reliable Digit Span. To better determine the utility of RLNS, we also examined other novel reliable span metrics and established summary scores from the Letter-Number Sequencing as potential validity indicators. Results: Analyses revealed excellent classification accuracy for RLNS, with an area under the curve of .88 (95% CI [.81, .96]). The optimal cutoff for RLNS (≤6) yielded .55 sensitivity and .95 specificity. Results showed similar but slightly lower classification accuracy statistics (areas under the curve of .77-.86) for the other LNS validity indicators. Conclusion: Initial findings support the criterion validity of RLNS as an embedded validity indicator. This measure is among the few extant performance validity tests that may be appropriate for youth baseline concussion testing. RLNS may also be appropriate for other types of pediatric evaluations. However, additional support is necessary before neuropsychologists can use RLNS clinically.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信