- Book学术

发布求助

文献互助智能选刊最新文献

IF 2.3 3区医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Dental Traumatology Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1111/edt.13041

Şeyma Mustuloğlu, Büşra Pınar Deniz

{"title":"Evaluation of Chatbots in the Emergency Management of Avulsion Injuries.","authors":"Şeyma Mustuloğlu, Büşra Pınar Deniz","doi":"10.1111/edt.13041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study assessed the accuracy and consistency of responses provided by six Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications, ChatGPT version 3.5 (OpenAI), ChatGPT version 4 (OpenAI), ChatGPT version 4.0 (OpenAI), Perplexity (Perplexity.AI), Gemini (Google), and Copilot (Bing), to questions related to emergency management of avulsed teeth.Materials and methods: Two pediatric dentists developed 18 true or false questions regarding dental avulsion and asked public chatbots for 3 days. The responses were recorded and compared with the correct answers. The SPSS program was used to calculate the obtained accuracies and their consistency.Results: ChatGPT 4.0 achieved the highest accuracy rate of 95.6% over the entire time frame, while Perplexity (Perplexity.AI) had the lowest accuracy rate of 67.2%. ChatGPT version 4.0 (OpenAI) was the only AI that achieved perfect agreement with real answers, except at noon on day 1. ChatGPT version 3.5 (OpenAI) was the AI that showed the weakest agreement (6 times).Conclusions: With the exception of ChatGPT's paid version, 4.0, AI chatbots do not seem ready for use as the main resource in managing avulsed teeth during emergencies. It might prove beneficial to incorporate the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines in chatbot databases, enhancing their accuracy and consistency.","PeriodicalId":55180,"journal":{"name":"Dental Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.13041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：本研究评估了六款人工智能（AI）应用程序（ChatGPT 3.5版（OpenAI）、ChatGPT 4版（OpenAI）、ChatGPT 4.0版（OpenAI）、Perplexity（Perplexity.AI）、Gemini（谷歌）和Copilot（必应））对牙齿脱落紧急处理相关问题所做回答的准确性和一致性：两名儿科牙医开发了 18 个有关牙齿脱落的真假问题，并向公共聊天机器人提问 3 天。对回答进行记录，并与正确答案进行比较。使用 SPSS 程序计算所获得的准确率及其一致性：ChatGPT 4.0 在整个时间段内的准确率最高，达到 95.6%，而 Perplexity (Perplexity.AI) 的准确率最低，仅为 67.2%。ChatGPT 4.0 版（OpenAI）是唯一一个与真实答案完全一致的人工智能，第 1 天中午除外。ChatGPT 3.5 版（OpenAI）是显示出最弱一致性的人工智能（6 次）：除了 ChatGPT 的付费版本 4.0，人工智能聊天机器人似乎还不能作为紧急情况下处理牙齿脱落的主要资源。将国际牙科创伤学会（IADT）指南纳入聊天机器人数据库，提高其准确性和一致性，可能会有所裨益。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluation of Chatbots in the Emergency Management of Avulsion Injuries.

Background: This study assessed the accuracy and consistency of responses provided by six Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications, ChatGPT version 3.5 (OpenAI), ChatGPT version 4 (OpenAI), ChatGPT version 4.0 (OpenAI), Perplexity (Perplexity.AI), Gemini (Google), and Copilot (Bing), to questions related to emergency management of avulsed teeth.

Materials and methods: Two pediatric dentists developed 18 true or false questions regarding dental avulsion and asked public chatbots for 3 days. The responses were recorded and compared with the correct answers. The SPSS program was used to calculate the obtained accuracies and their consistency.

Results: ChatGPT 4.0 achieved the highest accuracy rate of 95.6% over the entire time frame, while Perplexity (Perplexity.AI) had the lowest accuracy rate of 67.2%. ChatGPT version 4.0 (OpenAI) was the only AI that achieved perfect agreement with real answers, except at noon on day 1. ChatGPT version 3.5 (OpenAI) was the AI that showed the weakest agreement (6 times).

Conclusions: With the exception of ChatGPT's paid version, 4.0, AI chatbots do not seem ready for use as the main resource in managing avulsed teeth during emergencies. It might prove beneficial to incorporate the International Association of Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines in chatbot databases, enhancing their accuracy and consistency.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Dental Traumatology 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

32.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Dental Traumatology is an international journal that aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in all areas related to adult and pediatric dental traumatology. This includes the following topics: - Epidemiology, Social Aspects, Education, Diagnostics - Esthetics / Prosthetics/ Restorative - Evidence Based Traumatology & Study Design - Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery/Transplant/Implant - Pediatrics and Orthodontics - Prevention and Sports Dentistry - Endodontics and Periodontal Aspects The journal"s aim is to promote communication among clinicians, educators, researchers, and others interested in the field of dental traumatology.