景观——一个评估可持续性的镜头。

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Landscape Ecology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s10980-024-02007-7
Marie C Dade, Aletta Bonn, Felix Eigenbrod, María R Felipe-Lucia, Brendan Fisher, Benjamin Goldstein, Robert A Holland, Kelly A Hopping, Sandra Lavorel, Yann Lede Polain Waroux, Graham K MacDonald, Lisa Mandle, Jean Paul Metzger, Unai Pascual, Jesse T Rieb, Améline Vallet, Geoff J Wells, Carly D Ziter, Elena M Bennett, Brian E Robinson
{"title":"景观——一个评估可持续性的镜头。","authors":"Marie C Dade, Aletta Bonn, Felix Eigenbrod, María R Felipe-Lucia, Brendan Fisher, Benjamin Goldstein, Robert A Holland, Kelly A Hopping, Sandra Lavorel, Yann Lede Polain Waroux, Graham K MacDonald, Lisa Mandle, Jean Paul Metzger, Unai Pascual, Jesse T Rieb, Améline Vallet, Geoff J Wells, Carly D Ziter, Elena M Bennett, Brian E Robinson","doi":"10.1007/s10980-024-02007-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>There are urgent calls to transition society to more sustainable trajectories, at scales ranging from local to global. Landscape sustainability (LS), or the capacity for landscapes to provide equitable access to ecosystem services essential for human wellbeing for both current and future generations, provides an operational approach to monitor these transitions. However, the complexity of landscapes complicates how and what to consider when assessing LS.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify important features of landscapes that remain challenging to consider in LS assessments and provide guidance to strengthen future assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted two workshops to identify the complex features of landscapes that remain under-considered in LS assessments, and developed guidelines on how to better incorporate these features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identify open and connected boundaries and diversity of values as landscape features that must be better considered in LS assessments or risk exacerbating offstage sustainability burdens and power inequalities. We provide guidelines to avoid these pitfalls which emphasize assessing ecosystem service interactions across interconnected landscapes and incorporating local actors' diverse values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our guidelines provide a stepping stone for researchers and practitioners to better incorporate landscape complexities into LS assessments to inform landscape-level decisions and actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54745,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Ecology","volume":"40 2","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Landscapes-a lens for assessing sustainability.\",\"authors\":\"Marie C Dade, Aletta Bonn, Felix Eigenbrod, María R Felipe-Lucia, Brendan Fisher, Benjamin Goldstein, Robert A Holland, Kelly A Hopping, Sandra Lavorel, Yann Lede Polain Waroux, Graham K MacDonald, Lisa Mandle, Jean Paul Metzger, Unai Pascual, Jesse T Rieb, Améline Vallet, Geoff J Wells, Carly D Ziter, Elena M Bennett, Brian E Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10980-024-02007-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>There are urgent calls to transition society to more sustainable trajectories, at scales ranging from local to global. Landscape sustainability (LS), or the capacity for landscapes to provide equitable access to ecosystem services essential for human wellbeing for both current and future generations, provides an operational approach to monitor these transitions. However, the complexity of landscapes complicates how and what to consider when assessing LS.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify important features of landscapes that remain challenging to consider in LS assessments and provide guidance to strengthen future assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted two workshops to identify the complex features of landscapes that remain under-considered in LS assessments, and developed guidelines on how to better incorporate these features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identify open and connected boundaries and diversity of values as landscape features that must be better considered in LS assessments or risk exacerbating offstage sustainability burdens and power inequalities. We provide guidelines to avoid these pitfalls which emphasize assessing ecosystem service interactions across interconnected landscapes and incorporating local actors' diverse values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our guidelines provide a stepping stone for researchers and practitioners to better incorporate landscape complexities into LS assessments to inform landscape-level decisions and actions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape Ecology\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754308/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-02007-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-02007-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:迫切需要在从地方到全球的范围内,将社会转变为更可持续的轨道。景观可持续性(LS),或景观提供公平获取生态系统服务的能力,对当代和后代的人类福祉至关重要,为监测这些转变提供了一种可操作的方法。然而,景观的复杂性使得在评估土地价值时如何以及考虑什么变得复杂。目的:识别景观的重要特征,这些特征在景观评估中仍然具有挑战性,并为加强未来的评估提供指导。方法:我们举办了两次研讨会,以确定景观的复杂特征,在土地利用评估中仍未被充分考虑,并制定了如何更好地纳入这些特征的指导方针。结果:我们确定了开放和连接的边界和价值多样性作为景观特征,必须在LS评估中更好地考虑这些特征,否则可能会加剧台下的可持续性负担和权力不平等。我们提供了避免这些陷阱的指导方针,强调在相互关联的景观中评估生态系统服务的相互作用,并纳入当地行动者的不同价值。结论:我们的指南为研究人员和从业者提供了一个跳板,可以更好地将景观复杂性纳入景观评估,为景观层面的决策和行动提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Landscapes-a lens for assessing sustainability.

Context: There are urgent calls to transition society to more sustainable trajectories, at scales ranging from local to global. Landscape sustainability (LS), or the capacity for landscapes to provide equitable access to ecosystem services essential for human wellbeing for both current and future generations, provides an operational approach to monitor these transitions. However, the complexity of landscapes complicates how and what to consider when assessing LS.

Objectives: To identify important features of landscapes that remain challenging to consider in LS assessments and provide guidance to strengthen future assessments.

Methods: We conducted two workshops to identify the complex features of landscapes that remain under-considered in LS assessments, and developed guidelines on how to better incorporate these features.

Results: We identify open and connected boundaries and diversity of values as landscape features that must be better considered in LS assessments or risk exacerbating offstage sustainability burdens and power inequalities. We provide guidelines to avoid these pitfalls which emphasize assessing ecosystem service interactions across interconnected landscapes and incorporating local actors' diverse values.

Conclusions: Our guidelines provide a stepping stone for researchers and practitioners to better incorporate landscape complexities into LS assessments to inform landscape-level decisions and actions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape Ecology
Landscape Ecology 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Landscape Ecology is the flagship journal of a well-established and rapidly developing interdisciplinary science that focuses explicitly on the ecological understanding of spatial heterogeneity. Landscape Ecology draws together expertise from both biophysical and socioeconomic sciences to explore basic and applied research questions concerning the ecology, conservation, management, design/planning, and sustainability of landscapes as coupled human-environment systems. Landscape ecology studies are characterized by spatially explicit methods in which spatial attributes and arrangements of landscape elements are directly analyzed and related to ecological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信