产前超声诊断小脑异常:荟萃分析。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Zhen Sun, Yanqiu Chen, Qichen Su
{"title":"产前超声诊断小脑异常:荟萃分析。","authors":"Zhen Sun, Yanqiu Chen, Qichen Su","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2025.2453997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fetal cerebellar abnormalities are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and structural brain malformations. Accurate and early diagnosis is crucial for prenatal counseling and planning postnatal interventions. While prenatal ultrasound is a key tool for detecting fetal brain abnormalities, variations in diagnostic accuracy across studies necessitate a systematic evaluation of its effectiveness in diagnosing cerebellar abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases to identify relevant studies on prenatal ultrasound for diagnosing cerebellar anomalies. Inclusion criteria included studies with clear diagnostic outcomes, diverse patient populations, and standardized ultrasound protocols. Meta-analytic techniques were employed to assess overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and heterogeneity using Meta Disk. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included fifteen studies involving 1,902 fetuses with suspected cerebellar abnormalities. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of prenatal ultrasound were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.86) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 7.96 (95% CI: 3.23-19.64), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.18 (95% CI: 0.09-0.36), and the odds ratio was 46.76 (95% CI: 14.06-155.53). The combined area under the curve (AUC) reached 0.93, indicating robust diagnostic performance. Heterogeneity was observed, influenced by factors such as gestational age at screening, operator expertise, and ultrasound equipment quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prenatal ultrasound is a reliable tool for detecting cerebellar abnormalities with high sensitivity and specificity. However, variability in diagnostic performance suggests the need for standardized protocols and advanced imaging techniques to enhance accuracy. Future research should focus on integrating multiple imaging modalities to optimize prenatal screening outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"2453997"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of the cerebellar abnormalities: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhen Sun, Yanqiu Chen, Qichen Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2025.2453997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fetal cerebellar abnormalities are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and structural brain malformations. Accurate and early diagnosis is crucial for prenatal counseling and planning postnatal interventions. While prenatal ultrasound is a key tool for detecting fetal brain abnormalities, variations in diagnostic accuracy across studies necessitate a systematic evaluation of its effectiveness in diagnosing cerebellar abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases to identify relevant studies on prenatal ultrasound for diagnosing cerebellar anomalies. Inclusion criteria included studies with clear diagnostic outcomes, diverse patient populations, and standardized ultrasound protocols. Meta-analytic techniques were employed to assess overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and heterogeneity using Meta Disk. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included fifteen studies involving 1,902 fetuses with suspected cerebellar abnormalities. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of prenatal ultrasound were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.86) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 7.96 (95% CI: 3.23-19.64), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.18 (95% CI: 0.09-0.36), and the odds ratio was 46.76 (95% CI: 14.06-155.53). The combined area under the curve (AUC) reached 0.93, indicating robust diagnostic performance. Heterogeneity was observed, influenced by factors such as gestational age at screening, operator expertise, and ultrasound equipment quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prenatal ultrasound is a reliable tool for detecting cerebellar abnormalities with high sensitivity and specificity. However, variability in diagnostic performance suggests the need for standardized protocols and advanced imaging techniques to enhance accuracy. Future research should focus on integrating multiple imaging modalities to optimize prenatal screening outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"2453997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2025.2453997\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2025.2453997","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:胎儿小脑异常与神经发育障碍和脑结构畸形有关。准确和早期诊断对于产前咨询和产后干预计划至关重要。虽然产前超声是检测胎儿大脑异常的关键工具,但不同研究的诊断准确性差异需要对其诊断小脑异常的有效性进行系统评估。方法:对各大数据库进行文献检索,收集产前超声诊断小脑异常的相关研究。纳入标准包括具有明确诊断结果、不同患者群体和标准化超声方案的研究。Meta- Disk应用Meta分析技术评估总体诊断的准确性、敏感性、特异性和异质性。使用QUADAS-2工具评估纳入研究的质量。结果:荟萃分析包括15项研究,涉及1,902例疑似小脑异常的胎儿。产前超声的综合敏感性和特异性分别为0.83 (95% CI: 0.80 ~ 0.86)和0.97 (95% CI: 0.96 ~ 0.98)。阳性似然比为7.96 (95% CI: 3.23 ~ 19.64),阴性似然比为0.18 (95% CI: 0.09 ~ 0.36),优势比为46.76 (95% CI: 14.06 ~ 155.53)。综合曲线下面积(AUC)达到0.93,诊断效果良好。观察到异质性,受筛查时胎龄、操作员专业知识和超声设备质量等因素的影响。结论:产前超声是检测小脑异常的可靠工具,具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。然而,诊断表现的可变性表明需要标准化的方案和先进的成像技术来提高准确性。未来的研究应侧重于整合多种成像方式,以优化产前筛查结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of the cerebellar abnormalities: a meta-analysis.

Objective: Fetal cerebellar abnormalities are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and structural brain malformations. Accurate and early diagnosis is crucial for prenatal counseling and planning postnatal interventions. While prenatal ultrasound is a key tool for detecting fetal brain abnormalities, variations in diagnostic accuracy across studies necessitate a systematic evaluation of its effectiveness in diagnosing cerebellar abnormalities.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases to identify relevant studies on prenatal ultrasound for diagnosing cerebellar anomalies. Inclusion criteria included studies with clear diagnostic outcomes, diverse patient populations, and standardized ultrasound protocols. Meta-analytic techniques were employed to assess overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and heterogeneity using Meta Disk. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool.

Results: The meta-analysis included fifteen studies involving 1,902 fetuses with suspected cerebellar abnormalities. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of prenatal ultrasound were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.86) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 7.96 (95% CI: 3.23-19.64), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.18 (95% CI: 0.09-0.36), and the odds ratio was 46.76 (95% CI: 14.06-155.53). The combined area under the curve (AUC) reached 0.93, indicating robust diagnostic performance. Heterogeneity was observed, influenced by factors such as gestational age at screening, operator expertise, and ultrasound equipment quality.

Conclusions: Prenatal ultrasound is a reliable tool for detecting cerebellar abnormalities with high sensitivity and specificity. However, variability in diagnostic performance suggests the need for standardized protocols and advanced imaging techniques to enhance accuracy. Future research should focus on integrating multiple imaging modalities to optimize prenatal screening outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信