Gilles Van De Vyver , Svein-Erik Måsøy , Håvard Dalen , Bjørnar Leangen Grenne , Espen Holte , Sindre Hellum Olaisen , John Nyberg , Andreas Østvik , Lasse Løvstakken , Erik Smistad
{"title":"基于深度学习的二维超声心动图区域图像质量评分。","authors":"Gilles Van De Vyver , Svein-Erik Måsøy , Håvard Dalen , Bjørnar Leangen Grenne , Espen Holte , Sindre Hellum Olaisen , John Nyberg , Andreas Østvik , Lasse Løvstakken , Erik Smistad","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and compare methods to automatically estimate regional ultrasound image quality for echocardiography separate from view correctness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Three methods for estimating image quality were developed: (i) classic pixel-based metric: the generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR), computed on myocardial segments (region of interest) and left ventricle lumen (background), extracted by a U-Net segmentation model; (ii) local image coherence: the average local coherence as predicted by a U-Net model that predicts image coherence from B-mode ultrasound images at the pixel level; (iii) deep convolutional network: an end-to-end deep-learning model that predicts the quality of each region in the image directly. These methods were evaluated against manual regional quality annotations provided by three experienced cardiologists.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results indicated poor performance of the gCNR metric, with Spearman correlation to annotations of <em>ρ</em> = 0.24. The end-to-end learning model obtained the best result, <em>ρ</em> = 0.69, comparable to the inter-observer correlation, <em>ρ</em> = 0.63. Finally, the coherence-based method, with <em>ρ</em> = 0.58, out-performed the classical metrics and was more generic than the end-to-end approach.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The deep convolutional network provided the most accurate regional quality prediction, while the coherence-based method offered a more generalizable solution. gCNR showed limited effectiveness in this study. The image quality prediction tool is available as an open-source Python library at <span><span>https://github.com/GillesVanDeVyver/arqee</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"51 4","pages":"Pages 638-649"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional Image Quality Scoring for 2-D Echocardiography Using Deep Learning\",\"authors\":\"Gilles Van De Vyver , Svein-Erik Måsøy , Håvard Dalen , Bjørnar Leangen Grenne , Espen Holte , Sindre Hellum Olaisen , John Nyberg , Andreas Østvik , Lasse Løvstakken , Erik Smistad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.12.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and compare methods to automatically estimate regional ultrasound image quality for echocardiography separate from view correctness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Three methods for estimating image quality were developed: (i) classic pixel-based metric: the generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR), computed on myocardial segments (region of interest) and left ventricle lumen (background), extracted by a U-Net segmentation model; (ii) local image coherence: the average local coherence as predicted by a U-Net model that predicts image coherence from B-mode ultrasound images at the pixel level; (iii) deep convolutional network: an end-to-end deep-learning model that predicts the quality of each region in the image directly. These methods were evaluated against manual regional quality annotations provided by three experienced cardiologists.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results indicated poor performance of the gCNR metric, with Spearman correlation to annotations of <em>ρ</em> = 0.24. The end-to-end learning model obtained the best result, <em>ρ</em> = 0.69, comparable to the inter-observer correlation, <em>ρ</em> = 0.63. Finally, the coherence-based method, with <em>ρ</em> = 0.58, out-performed the classical metrics and was more generic than the end-to-end approach.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The deep convolutional network provided the most accurate regional quality prediction, while the coherence-based method offered a more generalizable solution. gCNR showed limited effectiveness in this study. The image quality prediction tool is available as an open-source Python library at <span><span>https://github.com/GillesVanDeVyver/arqee</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 638-649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924004691\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924004691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Regional Image Quality Scoring for 2-D Echocardiography Using Deep Learning
Objective
To develop and compare methods to automatically estimate regional ultrasound image quality for echocardiography separate from view correctness.
Methods
Three methods for estimating image quality were developed: (i) classic pixel-based metric: the generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR), computed on myocardial segments (region of interest) and left ventricle lumen (background), extracted by a U-Net segmentation model; (ii) local image coherence: the average local coherence as predicted by a U-Net model that predicts image coherence from B-mode ultrasound images at the pixel level; (iii) deep convolutional network: an end-to-end deep-learning model that predicts the quality of each region in the image directly. These methods were evaluated against manual regional quality annotations provided by three experienced cardiologists.
Results
The results indicated poor performance of the gCNR metric, with Spearman correlation to annotations of ρ = 0.24. The end-to-end learning model obtained the best result, ρ = 0.69, comparable to the inter-observer correlation, ρ = 0.63. Finally, the coherence-based method, with ρ = 0.58, out-performed the classical metrics and was more generic than the end-to-end approach.
Conclusion
The deep convolutional network provided the most accurate regional quality prediction, while the coherence-based method offered a more generalizable solution. gCNR showed limited effectiveness in this study. The image quality prediction tool is available as an open-source Python library at https://github.com/GillesVanDeVyver/arqee.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.