{"title":"口腔卫生能否预防住院患者的院内感染?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"K-M Miyahira, M-L Martins, W-F Liberato, M-B Magno, D-D Ferreira, J-R Tenório, L-C Maia, G-F Castro","doi":"10.4317/medoral.26706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of oral hygiene (OH) with chlorhexidine (CHX) on the evolution of nosocomial infections (NI).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Electronic searches were carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, VHL, and Grey Literature databases. Randomized clinical trials were included. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using RoB 2.0. Meta-analyses were carried out comparing patients who did or did not receive OH with CHX (0.05%, 0.12% and 2%) for NI, Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP), S. aureus infection (SA), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of hospital stay and Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The certainty of evidence (CE) was evaluated with GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were selected for quantitative and qualitative synthesis. The risk for VAP (RR 0.72 [0.58, 0.90], p=0.003) and NI (RR 0.70 [0.58, 0.83], p<0.001) were lower in patients of the CHX groups compared to controls, independently for [CHX] used for NI (RR≥0.49, p≤0.03). Patients who received CHX 2×/day presented similar risk to control (RR 0.98 [0.75, 1.30], p=0.91); while 3 and 4×/day or more (RR≥0.52, p≤0.002) presented lower risk for NI. Similar risk for SA was observed among groups (RR 0.42 [0.14, 1.26], p=0.12). The average days of hospitalization (p=0.67), ICU stay (p=0.37) and MV (p=0.57) did not differ between the groups. CE ranged from very low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OH with CHX reduced NI, regardless of concentration, when used 3×/day or more. However, it had no effect against AS and did not reduce length of hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":49016,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","volume":" ","pages":"e179-e191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does oral hygiene prevents nosocomial infections in hospitalized patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"K-M Miyahira, M-L Martins, W-F Liberato, M-B Magno, D-D Ferreira, J-R Tenório, L-C Maia, G-F Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/medoral.26706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of oral hygiene (OH) with chlorhexidine (CHX) on the evolution of nosocomial infections (NI).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Electronic searches were carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, VHL, and Grey Literature databases. Randomized clinical trials were included. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using RoB 2.0. Meta-analyses were carried out comparing patients who did or did not receive OH with CHX (0.05%, 0.12% and 2%) for NI, Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP), S. aureus infection (SA), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of hospital stay and Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The certainty of evidence (CE) was evaluated with GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were selected for quantitative and qualitative synthesis. The risk for VAP (RR 0.72 [0.58, 0.90], p=0.003) and NI (RR 0.70 [0.58, 0.83], p<0.001) were lower in patients of the CHX groups compared to controls, independently for [CHX] used for NI (RR≥0.49, p≤0.03). Patients who received CHX 2×/day presented similar risk to control (RR 0.98 [0.75, 1.30], p=0.91); while 3 and 4×/day or more (RR≥0.52, p≤0.002) presented lower risk for NI. Similar risk for SA was observed among groups (RR 0.42 [0.14, 1.26], p=0.12). The average days of hospitalization (p=0.67), ICU stay (p=0.37) and MV (p=0.57) did not differ between the groups. CE ranged from very low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OH with CHX reduced NI, regardless of concentration, when used 3×/day or more. However, it had no effect against AS and did not reduce length of hospital stay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e179-e191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972647/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.26706\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.26706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究旨在评估口腔卫生(OH)与氯己定(CHX)对医院感染(NI)演变的影响。材料和方法:在PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、VHL和Grey Literature数据库中进行电子检索。纳入随机临床试验。采用rob2.0对方法学质量和偏倚风险进行评估。meta分析比较了接受或未接受OH的患者在NI、呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)、金黄色葡萄球菌感染(SA)、机械通气持续时间(MV)、住院时间和重症监护病房(ICU)方面的CHX(0.05%、0.12%和2%)。证据的确定性(CE)采用GRADE评价方法。结果:选取13项研究进行定量和定性综合。VAP(相对危险度0.72 [0.58,0.90],p=0.003)和NI(相对危险度0.70[0.58,0.83])的风险,p结论:当使用3次/天或以上时,OH加CHX降低NI,无论浓度如何。然而,它对AS没有效果,也没有缩短住院时间。
Does oral hygiene prevents nosocomial infections in hospitalized patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of oral hygiene (OH) with chlorhexidine (CHX) on the evolution of nosocomial infections (NI).
Material and methods: Electronic searches were carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, VHL, and Grey Literature databases. Randomized clinical trials were included. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using RoB 2.0. Meta-analyses were carried out comparing patients who did or did not receive OH with CHX (0.05%, 0.12% and 2%) for NI, Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP), S. aureus infection (SA), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of hospital stay and Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The certainty of evidence (CE) was evaluated with GRADE approach.
Results: Thirteen studies were selected for quantitative and qualitative synthesis. The risk for VAP (RR 0.72 [0.58, 0.90], p=0.003) and NI (RR 0.70 [0.58, 0.83], p<0.001) were lower in patients of the CHX groups compared to controls, independently for [CHX] used for NI (RR≥0.49, p≤0.03). Patients who received CHX 2×/day presented similar risk to control (RR 0.98 [0.75, 1.30], p=0.91); while 3 and 4×/day or more (RR≥0.52, p≤0.002) presented lower risk for NI. Similar risk for SA was observed among groups (RR 0.42 [0.14, 1.26], p=0.12). The average days of hospitalization (p=0.67), ICU stay (p=0.37) and MV (p=0.57) did not differ between the groups. CE ranged from very low to moderate.
Conclusions: OH with CHX reduced NI, regardless of concentration, when used 3×/day or more. However, it had no effect against AS and did not reduce length of hospital stay.
期刊介绍:
1. Oral Medicine and Pathology:
Clinicopathological as well as medical or surgical management aspects of
diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, as well as
orofacial neurological disorders, and systemic conditions with an impact on
the oral cavity.
2. Oral Surgery:
Surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands,
maxillary bones, teeth, implants, oral surgical procedures. Surgical management
of diseases affecting head and neck areas.
3. Medically compromised patients in Dentistry:
Articles discussing medical problems in Odontology will also be included, with
a special focus on the clinico-odontological management of medically compromised patients, and considerations regarding high-risk or disabled patients.
4. Implantology
5. Periodontology