口腔卫生能否预防住院患者的院内感染?系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
K-M Miyahira, M-L Martins, W-F Liberato, M-B Magno, D-D Ferreira, J-R Tenório, L-C Maia, G-F Castro
{"title":"口腔卫生能否预防住院患者的院内感染?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"K-M Miyahira, M-L Martins, W-F Liberato, M-B Magno, D-D Ferreira, J-R Tenório, L-C Maia, G-F Castro","doi":"10.4317/medoral.26706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of oral hygiene (OH) with chlorhexidine (CHX) on the evolution of nosocomial infections (NI).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Electronic searches were carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, VHL, and Grey Literature databases. Randomized clinical trials were included. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using RoB 2.0. Meta-analyses were carried out comparing patients who did or did not receive OH with CHX (0.05%, 0.12% and 2%) for NI, Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP), S. aureus infection (SA), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of hospital stay and Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The certainty of evidence (CE) was evaluated with GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were selected for quantitative and qualitative synthesis. The risk for VAP (RR 0.72 [0.58, 0.90], p=0.003) and NI (RR 0.70 [0.58, 0.83], p<0.001) were lower in patients of the CHX groups compared to controls, independently for [CHX] used for NI (RR≥0.49, p≤0.03). Patients who received CHX 2×/day presented similar risk to control (RR 0.98 [0.75, 1.30], p=0.91); while 3 and 4×/day or more (RR≥0.52, p≤0.002) presented lower risk for NI. Similar risk for SA was observed among groups (RR 0.42 [0.14, 1.26], p=0.12). The average days of hospitalization (p=0.67), ICU stay (p=0.37) and MV (p=0.57) did not differ between the groups. CE ranged from very low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OH with CHX reduced NI, regardless of concentration, when used 3×/day or more. However, it had no effect against AS and did not reduce length of hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":49016,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","volume":" ","pages":"e179-e191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does oral hygiene prevents nosocomial infections in hospitalized patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"K-M Miyahira, M-L Martins, W-F Liberato, M-B Magno, D-D Ferreira, J-R Tenório, L-C Maia, G-F Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/medoral.26706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of oral hygiene (OH) with chlorhexidine (CHX) on the evolution of nosocomial infections (NI).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Electronic searches were carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, VHL, and Grey Literature databases. Randomized clinical trials were included. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using RoB 2.0. Meta-analyses were carried out comparing patients who did or did not receive OH with CHX (0.05%, 0.12% and 2%) for NI, Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP), S. aureus infection (SA), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of hospital stay and Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The certainty of evidence (CE) was evaluated with GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were selected for quantitative and qualitative synthesis. The risk for VAP (RR 0.72 [0.58, 0.90], p=0.003) and NI (RR 0.70 [0.58, 0.83], p<0.001) were lower in patients of the CHX groups compared to controls, independently for [CHX] used for NI (RR≥0.49, p≤0.03). Patients who received CHX 2×/day presented similar risk to control (RR 0.98 [0.75, 1.30], p=0.91); while 3 and 4×/day or more (RR≥0.52, p≤0.002) presented lower risk for NI. Similar risk for SA was observed among groups (RR 0.42 [0.14, 1.26], p=0.12). The average days of hospitalization (p=0.67), ICU stay (p=0.37) and MV (p=0.57) did not differ between the groups. CE ranged from very low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OH with CHX reduced NI, regardless of concentration, when used 3×/day or more. However, it had no effect against AS and did not reduce length of hospital stay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e179-e191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972647/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.26706\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.26706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估口腔卫生(OH)与氯己定(CHX)对医院感染(NI)演变的影响。材料和方法:在PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、VHL和Grey Literature数据库中进行电子检索。纳入随机临床试验。采用rob2.0对方法学质量和偏倚风险进行评估。meta分析比较了接受或未接受OH的患者在NI、呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)、金黄色葡萄球菌感染(SA)、机械通气持续时间(MV)、住院时间和重症监护病房(ICU)方面的CHX(0.05%、0.12%和2%)。证据的确定性(CE)采用GRADE评价方法。结果:选取13项研究进行定量和定性综合。VAP(相对危险度0.72 [0.58,0.90],p=0.003)和NI(相对危险度0.70[0.58,0.83])的风险,p结论:当使用3次/天或以上时,OH加CHX降低NI,无论浓度如何。然而,它对AS没有效果,也没有缩短住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Does oral hygiene prevents nosocomial infections in hospitalized patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Does oral hygiene prevents nosocomial infections in hospitalized patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Does oral hygiene prevents nosocomial infections in hospitalized patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Does oral hygiene prevents nosocomial infections in hospitalized patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of oral hygiene (OH) with chlorhexidine (CHX) on the evolution of nosocomial infections (NI).

Material and methods: Electronic searches were carried out in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, VHL, and Grey Literature databases. Randomized clinical trials were included. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using RoB 2.0. Meta-analyses were carried out comparing patients who did or did not receive OH with CHX (0.05%, 0.12% and 2%) for NI, Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP), S. aureus infection (SA), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of hospital stay and Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The certainty of evidence (CE) was evaluated with GRADE approach.

Results: Thirteen studies were selected for quantitative and qualitative synthesis. The risk for VAP (RR 0.72 [0.58, 0.90], p=0.003) and NI (RR 0.70 [0.58, 0.83], p<0.001) were lower in patients of the CHX groups compared to controls, independently for [CHX] used for NI (RR≥0.49, p≤0.03). Patients who received CHX 2×/day presented similar risk to control (RR 0.98 [0.75, 1.30], p=0.91); while 3 and 4×/day or more (RR≥0.52, p≤0.002) presented lower risk for NI. Similar risk for SA was observed among groups (RR 0.42 [0.14, 1.26], p=0.12). The average days of hospitalization (p=0.67), ICU stay (p=0.37) and MV (p=0.57) did not differ between the groups. CE ranged from very low to moderate.

Conclusions: OH with CHX reduced NI, regardless of concentration, when used 3×/day or more. However, it had no effect against AS and did not reduce length of hospital stay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal
Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: 1. Oral Medicine and Pathology: Clinicopathological as well as medical or surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, as well as orofacial neurological disorders, and systemic conditions with an impact on the oral cavity. 2. Oral Surgery: Surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, teeth, implants, oral surgical procedures. Surgical management of diseases affecting head and neck areas. 3. Medically compromised patients in Dentistry: Articles discussing medical problems in Odontology will also be included, with a special focus on the clinico-odontological management of medically compromised patients, and considerations regarding high-risk or disabled patients. 4. Implantology 5. Periodontology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信