FAB 测试与老年人跌倒发生率有关吗?对门诊病人跌倒风险评估的回顾性分析。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Victoire Leroy, Yaohua Chen, Elisabeth Brocquet, Julien Labreuche, Cédric Gaxatte, Kelly Cotton, Jean Roche, Dominique Huvent-Grelle, François Puisieux
{"title":"FAB 测试与老年人跌倒发生率有关吗?对门诊病人跌倒风险评估的回顾性分析。","authors":"Victoire Leroy, Yaohua Chen, Elisabeth Brocquet, Julien Labreuche, Cédric Gaxatte, Kelly Cotton, Jean Roche, Dominique Huvent-Grelle, François Puisieux","doi":"10.1007/s41999-024-01134-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of French older adults. Participants with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 24 were recruited from a fall clinic in a geriatrics department. We recorded history of falls in the preceding 6 months, as well as Timed Up and Go test and mobility assessment at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 199 participants at baseline (mean age 83.1 years; 70.3% of females), of which 50.8% (101) had abnormal FAB scores (indicating executive impairment). Participants with executive impairment were more likely to have a history of falls. 125 and 96 participants completed 6- and 12-month follow-up visits, respectively. There was no association between abnormal FAB score at baseline and any or serious falls. Abnormal baseline FAB score was only associated with repeated (≥ 2) falls at 6 months, after adjusting for age, education, and polypharmacy (OR = 3.1 95% CI [1.0, 9.9]). Moreover, participants with abnormal FAB scores had significantly lower Timed Up and Go test scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abnormal FAB score was associated with repeated falls at 6 months, but not with total incident falls during the follow-up period. Our results highlight the potential utility of FAB in fall risk assessment, particularly for repeated falls, but further studies are needed to clarify this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the FAB test associated with fall occurrence in older adults? A retrospective analysis of outpatient fall risk assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Victoire Leroy, Yaohua Chen, Elisabeth Brocquet, Julien Labreuche, Cédric Gaxatte, Kelly Cotton, Jean Roche, Dominique Huvent-Grelle, François Puisieux\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41999-024-01134-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of French older adults. Participants with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 24 were recruited from a fall clinic in a geriatrics department. We recorded history of falls in the preceding 6 months, as well as Timed Up and Go test and mobility assessment at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 199 participants at baseline (mean age 83.1 years; 70.3% of females), of which 50.8% (101) had abnormal FAB scores (indicating executive impairment). Participants with executive impairment were more likely to have a history of falls. 125 and 96 participants completed 6- and 12-month follow-up visits, respectively. There was no association between abnormal FAB score at baseline and any or serious falls. Abnormal baseline FAB score was only associated with repeated (≥ 2) falls at 6 months, after adjusting for age, education, and polypharmacy (OR = 3.1 95% CI [1.0, 9.9]). Moreover, participants with abnormal FAB scores had significantly lower Timed Up and Go test scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abnormal FAB score was associated with repeated falls at 6 months, but not with total incident falls during the follow-up period. Our results highlight the potential utility of FAB in fall risk assessment, particularly for repeated falls, but further studies are needed to clarify this association.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Geriatric Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Geriatric Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-024-01134-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-024-01134-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法:我们对法国老年人进行了一项单中心、回顾性队列研究。最小精神状态检查(MMSE)≥24的参与者从老年科的秋季诊所招募。我们记录了前6个月的跌倒史,并在基线和6个月和12个月的随访中进行了Timed Up and Go测试和活动能力评估。结果:我们纳入了199名基线参与者(平均年龄83.1岁;其中50.8%(101例)FAB评分异常(提示执行功能障碍)。执行能力受损的参与者更有可能有跌倒史。125名和96名参与者分别完成了6个月和12个月的随访。基线时异常的FAB评分与任何或严重的跌倒之间没有关联。在调整年龄、教育程度和多种药物后,异常基线FAB评分仅与6个月时重复(≥2次)下降相关(OR = 3.1 95% CI[1.0, 9.9])。此外,FAB得分异常的参与者的Timed Up和Go测试得分明显较低。结论:FAB评分异常与6个月的重复跌倒有关,但与随访期间的总跌倒无关。我们的研究结果强调了FAB在跌倒风险评估中的潜在效用,特别是对于反复跌倒,但需要进一步的研究来阐明这种关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the FAB test associated with fall occurrence in older adults? A retrospective analysis of outpatient fall risk assessment.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of French older adults. Participants with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 24 were recruited from a fall clinic in a geriatrics department. We recorded history of falls in the preceding 6 months, as well as Timed Up and Go test and mobility assessment at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow-up.

Results: We included 199 participants at baseline (mean age 83.1 years; 70.3% of females), of which 50.8% (101) had abnormal FAB scores (indicating executive impairment). Participants with executive impairment were more likely to have a history of falls. 125 and 96 participants completed 6- and 12-month follow-up visits, respectively. There was no association between abnormal FAB score at baseline and any or serious falls. Abnormal baseline FAB score was only associated with repeated (≥ 2) falls at 6 months, after adjusting for age, education, and polypharmacy (OR = 3.1 95% CI [1.0, 9.9]). Moreover, participants with abnormal FAB scores had significantly lower Timed Up and Go test scores.

Conclusion: Abnormal FAB score was associated with repeated falls at 6 months, but not with total incident falls during the follow-up period. Our results highlight the potential utility of FAB in fall risk assessment, particularly for repeated falls, but further studies are needed to clarify this association.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信