构建和验证预测局部前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后Gleason分级组升级的模型:机器学习算法与传统逻辑回归的比较

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1159/000543492
Qian Gui, Xin Wang, Dandan Wu, Yonglian Guo
{"title":"构建和验证预测局部前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后Gleason分级组升级的模型:机器学习算法与传统逻辑回归的比较","authors":"Qian Gui, Xin Wang, Dandan Wu, Yonglian Guo","doi":"10.1159/000543492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The occurrence of Gleason grade group upgrading (GGU) significantly impacts treatment strategy developments. We aimed to develop an optimal predictive model to assess the risk of GGU in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa), by comparing traditional logistic regression (LR) with seven machine learning algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective collection of clinical data was conducted on patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at Wuhan Central Hospital (January 2017 to December 2023, n = 177) and Jiangxi Cancer Hospital (July 2019 to February 2024, n = 87). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was employed to filter the clinical characteristics of patients. Subsequently, models were conducted using multivariate LR, along with seven diverse machine learning algorithms: extreme gradient boosting, decision tree, multilayer perceptron, naive Bayes, K-nearest neighbors, random forest, and support vector machine. By employing the receiver operating characteristic curves, accuracy, brier score, recall, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA), we compared the predictive capabilities and clinical utility of eight models to identify the optimal one.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the evaluation of eight models, the LR model demonstrated superior performance. In the modeling set, it achieved an area under curve (AUC) of 0.826 (95% CI: 0.808-0.845), accuracy of 0.765, and a brier score of 0.167. In the validation set, it kept good results with an AUC of 0.819 (95% CI: 0.758-0.880), accuracy of 0.725, and a brier score of 0.180. The calibration curves, brier score, and DCA also demonstrated the excellent calibration and net benefit of the LR model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After conducting a comprehensive multi-model comparison, we concluded that the LR model was optimal for predicting GGU, which was confirmed by external validation. Our study also revealed percent free prostate-specific antigen density as a predictive factor for GGU, offering a novel approach for managing localized PCa patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing and Validating Models for Predicting Gleason Grade Group Upgrading following Radical Prostatectomy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparison between Machine Learning Algorithms and Conventional Logistic Regression.\",\"authors\":\"Qian Gui, Xin Wang, Dandan Wu, Yonglian Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The occurrence of Gleason grade group upgrading (GGU) significantly impacts treatment strategy developments. We aimed to develop an optimal predictive model to assess the risk of GGU in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa), by comparing traditional logistic regression (LR) with seven machine learning algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective collection of clinical data was conducted on patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at Wuhan Central Hospital (January 2017 to December 2023, n = 177) and Jiangxi Cancer Hospital (July 2019 to February 2024, n = 87). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was employed to filter the clinical characteristics of patients. Subsequently, models were conducted using multivariate LR, along with seven diverse machine learning algorithms: extreme gradient boosting, decision tree, multilayer perceptron, naive Bayes, K-nearest neighbors, random forest, and support vector machine. By employing the receiver operating characteristic curves, accuracy, brier score, recall, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA), we compared the predictive capabilities and clinical utility of eight models to identify the optimal one.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the evaluation of eight models, the LR model demonstrated superior performance. In the modeling set, it achieved an area under curve (AUC) of 0.826 (95% CI: 0.808-0.845), accuracy of 0.765, and a brier score of 0.167. In the validation set, it kept good results with an AUC of 0.819 (95% CI: 0.758-0.880), accuracy of 0.725, and a brier score of 0.180. The calibration curves, brier score, and DCA also demonstrated the excellent calibration and net benefit of the LR model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After conducting a comprehensive multi-model comparison, we concluded that the LR model was optimal for predicting GGU, which was confirmed by external validation. Our study also revealed percent free prostate-specific antigen density as a predictive factor for GGU, offering a novel approach for managing localized PCa patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543492\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543492","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:Gleason分级组升级(GGU)的发生显著影响了治疗策略的发展。我们的目标是通过比较传统的逻辑回归(LR)和7种机器学习算法,建立一个最优的预测模型来评估局限性前列腺癌(PCa)患者GGU的风险。方法:回顾性收集武汉市中心医院(2017年1月至2023年12月,n=177)和江西省肿瘤医院(2019年7月至2024年2月,n=87)行RP的患者的临床资料。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归对患者的临床特征进行筛选。随后,使用多元LR以及七种不同的机器学习算法进行模型:极端梯度增强、决策树、多层感知器、朴素贝叶斯、k近邻、随机森林和支持向量机。我们采用受试者工作特征曲线、准确度、brier评分、召回率、校准曲线和决策曲线分析,比较8种模型的预测能力和临床应用,以确定最佳模型。结果:在8个模型的评价中,LR模型表现出较好的性能。在建模集中,它的AUC为0.826 (95% CI: 0.808 - 0.845),准确率为0.765,brier评分为0.167。在验证集中,AUC为0.819 (95% CI: 0.758 ~ 0.880),准确率为0.725,brier评分为0.180,保持了较好的结果。校正曲线、brier评分和DCA也表明LR模型具有良好的校正效果和净效益。结论:经过综合多模型比较,我们认为LR模型是预测GGU的最佳模型,并得到了外部验证。我们的研究还揭示了游离前列腺特异性抗原密度百分比作为GGU的预测因素,为管理局限性PCa患者提供了一种新的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constructing and Validating Models for Predicting Gleason Grade Group Upgrading following Radical Prostatectomy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparison between Machine Learning Algorithms and Conventional Logistic Regression.

Introduction: The occurrence of Gleason grade group upgrading (GGU) significantly impacts treatment strategy developments. We aimed to develop an optimal predictive model to assess the risk of GGU in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa), by comparing traditional logistic regression (LR) with seven machine learning algorithms.

Methods: A retrospective collection of clinical data was conducted on patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at Wuhan Central Hospital (January 2017 to December 2023, n = 177) and Jiangxi Cancer Hospital (July 2019 to February 2024, n = 87). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was employed to filter the clinical characteristics of patients. Subsequently, models were conducted using multivariate LR, along with seven diverse machine learning algorithms: extreme gradient boosting, decision tree, multilayer perceptron, naive Bayes, K-nearest neighbors, random forest, and support vector machine. By employing the receiver operating characteristic curves, accuracy, brier score, recall, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA), we compared the predictive capabilities and clinical utility of eight models to identify the optimal one.

Results: In the evaluation of eight models, the LR model demonstrated superior performance. In the modeling set, it achieved an area under curve (AUC) of 0.826 (95% CI: 0.808-0.845), accuracy of 0.765, and a brier score of 0.167. In the validation set, it kept good results with an AUC of 0.819 (95% CI: 0.758-0.880), accuracy of 0.725, and a brier score of 0.180. The calibration curves, brier score, and DCA also demonstrated the excellent calibration and net benefit of the LR model.

Conclusions: After conducting a comprehensive multi-model comparison, we concluded that the LR model was optimal for predicting GGU, which was confirmed by external validation. Our study also revealed percent free prostate-specific antigen density as a predictive factor for GGU, offering a novel approach for managing localized PCa patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信