革兰氏阴性细菌的抗菌药敏感性:巴西实验室网络中对患者的分析。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Amanda Azevedo Bittencourt , Thales José Polis , Vinicius Lima Faustino , Paula de Mendonça Batista , Ana Carolina Padula Ribeiro Pereira , Marina Della Negra de Paula , Darlan Augusto da Costa Rocha , Paola Cappellano Daher , Jorge Luiz Mello Sampaio
{"title":"革兰氏阴性细菌的抗菌药敏感性:巴西实验室网络中对患者的分析。","authors":"Amanda Azevedo Bittencourt ,&nbsp;Thales José Polis ,&nbsp;Vinicius Lima Faustino ,&nbsp;Paula de Mendonça Batista ,&nbsp;Ana Carolina Padula Ribeiro Pereira ,&nbsp;Marina Della Negra de Paula ,&nbsp;Darlan Augusto da Costa Rocha ,&nbsp;Paola Cappellano Daher ,&nbsp;Jorge Luiz Mello Sampaio","doi":"10.1016/j.jgar.2025.01.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of gram-negative pathogens in Brazil from 2018 to 2020, addressing the gap in national data on healthcare-associated infections, using information from a private laboratory network.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted using a database from Fleury hospital network, a private laboratory in Brazil. The analysis included blood, urine, and lower respiratory tract samples collected from January 2018 to June 2020. The study included consecutive non-duplicated isolates of <em>Enterobacterales</em> or <em>P. aeruginosa</em> from inpatients aged ≥18 years old. Bacterial identification was performed using mass spectrometry, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined following EUCAST/BrCAST guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 25,180 isolates were included in the analysis. Most of the sample consisted of female patients (57.9%), with a mean age of 70 years (SD 18.1). <em>Enterobacterales</em> were the most prevalent pathogens found (76.2%), while <em>P. aeruginosa</em> was present in the remaining 23.8%. In terms of antimicrobial susceptibility, <em>Enterobacterales</em> exhibited a higher susceptibility rate to ceftazidime/avibactam (97.1%) and amikacin (95.6%), while <em>P. aeruginosa</em> showed a higher susceptibility rate to polymyxin B (97.1%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (86.6%). Among carbapenem-resistant <em>P. aeruginosa</em> isolates, 75% were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Additionally, 24.2% of K<em>. pneumoniae complex</em> samples were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div><em>Enterobacterales</em> was the most frequently encountered group in Brazil. Ceftazidime/avibactam and amikacin demonstrated the highest efficacy against this group, while ceftolozane/tazobactam and polymyxin had the highest efficacy against <em>P. aeruginosa</em>. This highlights the importance of new β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of gram-negative infections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 266-271"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria: Analysis from patients in a laboratory network in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Azevedo Bittencourt ,&nbsp;Thales José Polis ,&nbsp;Vinicius Lima Faustino ,&nbsp;Paula de Mendonça Batista ,&nbsp;Ana Carolina Padula Ribeiro Pereira ,&nbsp;Marina Della Negra de Paula ,&nbsp;Darlan Augusto da Costa Rocha ,&nbsp;Paola Cappellano Daher ,&nbsp;Jorge Luiz Mello Sampaio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jgar.2025.01.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of gram-negative pathogens in Brazil from 2018 to 2020, addressing the gap in national data on healthcare-associated infections, using information from a private laboratory network.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted using a database from Fleury hospital network, a private laboratory in Brazil. The analysis included blood, urine, and lower respiratory tract samples collected from January 2018 to June 2020. The study included consecutive non-duplicated isolates of <em>Enterobacterales</em> or <em>P. aeruginosa</em> from inpatients aged ≥18 years old. Bacterial identification was performed using mass spectrometry, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined following EUCAST/BrCAST guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 25,180 isolates were included in the analysis. Most of the sample consisted of female patients (57.9%), with a mean age of 70 years (SD 18.1). <em>Enterobacterales</em> were the most prevalent pathogens found (76.2%), while <em>P. aeruginosa</em> was present in the remaining 23.8%. In terms of antimicrobial susceptibility, <em>Enterobacterales</em> exhibited a higher susceptibility rate to ceftazidime/avibactam (97.1%) and amikacin (95.6%), while <em>P. aeruginosa</em> showed a higher susceptibility rate to polymyxin B (97.1%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (86.6%). Among carbapenem-resistant <em>P. aeruginosa</em> isolates, 75% were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Additionally, 24.2% of K<em>. pneumoniae complex</em> samples were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div><em>Enterobacterales</em> was the most frequently encountered group in Brazil. Ceftazidime/avibactam and amikacin demonstrated the highest efficacy against this group, while ceftolozane/tazobactam and polymyxin had the highest efficacy against <em>P. aeruginosa</em>. This highlights the importance of new β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of gram-negative infections.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 266-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716525000268\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716525000268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria: Analysis from patients in a laboratory network in Brazil

Objectives

This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of gram-negative pathogens in Brazil from 2018 to 2020, addressing the gap in national data on healthcare-associated infections, using information from a private laboratory network.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted using a database from Fleury hospital network, a private laboratory in Brazil. The analysis included blood, urine, and lower respiratory tract samples collected from January 2018 to June 2020. The study included consecutive non-duplicated isolates of Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa from inpatients aged ≥18 years old. Bacterial identification was performed using mass spectrometry, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined following EUCAST/BrCAST guidelines.

Results

A total of 25,180 isolates were included in the analysis. Most of the sample consisted of female patients (57.9%), with a mean age of 70 years (SD 18.1). Enterobacterales were the most prevalent pathogens found (76.2%), while P. aeruginosa was present in the remaining 23.8%. In terms of antimicrobial susceptibility, Enterobacterales exhibited a higher susceptibility rate to ceftazidime/avibactam (97.1%) and amikacin (95.6%), while P. aeruginosa showed a higher susceptibility rate to polymyxin B (97.1%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (86.6%). Among carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates, 75% were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam. Additionally, 24.2% of K. pneumoniae complex samples were identified.

Conclusion

Enterobacterales was the most frequently encountered group in Brazil. Ceftazidime/avibactam and amikacin demonstrated the highest efficacy against this group, while ceftolozane/tazobactam and polymyxin had the highest efficacy against P. aeruginosa. This highlights the importance of new β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of gram-negative infections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance INFECTIOUS DISEASES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (JGAR) is a quarterly online journal run by an international Editorial Board that focuses on the global spread of antibiotic-resistant microbes. JGAR is a dedicated journal for all professionals working in research, health care, the environment and animal infection control, aiming to track the resistance threat worldwide and provides a single voice devoted to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Featuring peer-reviewed and up to date research articles, reviews, short notes and hot topics JGAR covers the key topics related to antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiparasitic resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信