Hassan Saleh, Mohammad Taher Mirakzehi, Hosin Moradi bidokhti, Mohsen Kazemi
{"title":"噬菌体和有机酸作为饲料添加剂减少攻毒鸡肠炎沙门氏菌的效果评价。","authors":"Hassan Saleh, Mohammad Taher Mirakzehi, Hosin Moradi bidokhti, Mohsen Kazemi","doi":"10.1111/jpn.14103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study aimed to compare the effects of dietary supplementation of bacteriophage (BP) and acidifiers on performance, meat quality, morphology, and intestinal microbiota in chickens challenged and unchallenged with Salmonella enteritidis (SE) and also to investigate the possibility of replacing them in the diet with antibiotics. A total of 1760 male Ross (308) chicks were randomly assigned to 11 dietary treatments (8 pens/with 20 male chickens in each). Dietary treatments were as follows: SE-uninfected (negative control (NC), a basal diet without supplemention; NC+ 500 g/t BP (NBP1); NC+ 1000 g/t BP (NBP2); NC+ 300 mg/kg acidifier A (NAA); NC+ 300 mg/kg acidifier B (NAB)) and SE-infected (positive control (PC), a basal diet without supplemention; PC+ 40 mg/kg Antibiotic enrofloxacin (PA); PC+ 500 g/t BP (PBP1); PC+ 1000 g/t BP (PBP2); PC+ 3000 mg/kg acidifier A (PAA); PC+ 3000 mg/kg acidifier B (PAB)). At 13 D birds in challenged groups were orally gavaged with 1 mL bacterial suspension containing approximately 108 CFU Salmonella enterica. The results indicated that chicks challenged with SE impaired performance so that BWG and FI significantly decreased and FCR increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Diets containing a high dose of BP increased BW and improved FCR in challenged and unchallenged chickens. The quality of breast meat showed a decline in oxidation in chickens challenged with SE (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The inclusion of bacteriophage in the diet of chickens (1000 g/t) improved the L*, b*, and oxidation of meat. The use of bacteriophage and acidifier A in the diet significantly increased the Lactobacillus, and LAB count, especially in the challenged groups. The challenge of chickens with SE decreased the villus height and crypt depth in different parts of the small intestine (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The results of the present study suggested that 1000 g/t of BP probably improves chicken performance by increasing beneficial bacteria and decreasing pathogenic bacteria. Also, bacteriophage showed an improvement in the performance reduction of chickens with <i>Salmonella</i> infection. In addition, improved meat quality and beneficial changes in the microbiome and intestinal morphology indicate the effectiveness of BP as an alternative antibiotic growth promoter in broiler diets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","volume":"109 3","pages":"881-890"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Effect of Bacteriophages and Organic Acids as a Feed Additive to Reduce Salmonella enteritidis in Challenged Chickens\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Saleh, Mohammad Taher Mirakzehi, Hosin Moradi bidokhti, Mohsen Kazemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpn.14103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to compare the effects of dietary supplementation of bacteriophage (BP) and acidifiers on performance, meat quality, morphology, and intestinal microbiota in chickens challenged and unchallenged with Salmonella enteritidis (SE) and also to investigate the possibility of replacing them in the diet with antibiotics. A total of 1760 male Ross (308) chicks were randomly assigned to 11 dietary treatments (8 pens/with 20 male chickens in each). Dietary treatments were as follows: SE-uninfected (negative control (NC), a basal diet without supplemention; NC+ 500 g/t BP (NBP1); NC+ 1000 g/t BP (NBP2); NC+ 300 mg/kg acidifier A (NAA); NC+ 300 mg/kg acidifier B (NAB)) and SE-infected (positive control (PC), a basal diet without supplemention; PC+ 40 mg/kg Antibiotic enrofloxacin (PA); PC+ 500 g/t BP (PBP1); PC+ 1000 g/t BP (PBP2); PC+ 3000 mg/kg acidifier A (PAA); PC+ 3000 mg/kg acidifier B (PAB)). At 13 D birds in challenged groups were orally gavaged with 1 mL bacterial suspension containing approximately 108 CFU Salmonella enterica. The results indicated that chicks challenged with SE impaired performance so that BWG and FI significantly decreased and FCR increased (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Diets containing a high dose of BP increased BW and improved FCR in challenged and unchallenged chickens. The quality of breast meat showed a decline in oxidation in chickens challenged with SE (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The inclusion of bacteriophage in the diet of chickens (1000 g/t) improved the L*, b*, and oxidation of meat. The use of bacteriophage and acidifier A in the diet significantly increased the Lactobacillus, and LAB count, especially in the challenged groups. The challenge of chickens with SE decreased the villus height and crypt depth in different parts of the small intestine (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The results of the present study suggested that 1000 g/t of BP probably improves chicken performance by increasing beneficial bacteria and decreasing pathogenic bacteria. Also, bacteriophage showed an improvement in the performance reduction of chickens with <i>Salmonella</i> infection. In addition, improved meat quality and beneficial changes in the microbiome and intestinal morphology indicate the effectiveness of BP as an alternative antibiotic growth promoter in broiler diets.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"109 3\",\"pages\":\"881-890\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpn.14103\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpn.14103","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在比较饲粮中添加噬菌体(BP)和酸化剂对感染肠炎沙门氏菌(SE)和未感染沙门氏菌的鸡的生产性能、肉质、形态和肠道微生物群的影响,并探讨在饲粮中添加抗生素替代它们的可能性。选取1760只雄性罗斯鸡(308只),随机分为11个饲粮处理(8个栏/每个栏20只鸡)。饲粮处理如下:未感染se(阴性对照),饲喂不添加se的基础饲粮;NC+ 500g /t BP (NBP1);NC+ 1000 g/t BP (NBP2);NC+酸化剂A (NAA) 300 mg/kg;NC+ 300 mg/kg酸化剂B (NAB))和se感染(阳性对照(PC),基础日粮不添加;PC+抗生素恩诺沙星(PA) 40 mg/kg;PC+ 500 g/t BP (PBP1);PC+ 1000 g/t BP (PBP2);PC+ 3000 mg/kg酸化剂A (PAA);PC+ 3000 mg/kg酸化剂B (PAB))。在13 D时,攻毒组的鸟被灌胃1 mL含有大约108 CFU肠道沙门氏菌的细菌悬浮液。结果表明,SE攻毒对雏鸡的生产性能有显著影响,BWG和FI显著降低,FCR显著升高(p < 0.05)
Evaluation of the Effect of Bacteriophages and Organic Acids as a Feed Additive to Reduce Salmonella enteritidis in Challenged Chickens
This study aimed to compare the effects of dietary supplementation of bacteriophage (BP) and acidifiers on performance, meat quality, morphology, and intestinal microbiota in chickens challenged and unchallenged with Salmonella enteritidis (SE) and also to investigate the possibility of replacing them in the diet with antibiotics. A total of 1760 male Ross (308) chicks were randomly assigned to 11 dietary treatments (8 pens/with 20 male chickens in each). Dietary treatments were as follows: SE-uninfected (negative control (NC), a basal diet without supplemention; NC+ 500 g/t BP (NBP1); NC+ 1000 g/t BP (NBP2); NC+ 300 mg/kg acidifier A (NAA); NC+ 300 mg/kg acidifier B (NAB)) and SE-infected (positive control (PC), a basal diet without supplemention; PC+ 40 mg/kg Antibiotic enrofloxacin (PA); PC+ 500 g/t BP (PBP1); PC+ 1000 g/t BP (PBP2); PC+ 3000 mg/kg acidifier A (PAA); PC+ 3000 mg/kg acidifier B (PAB)). At 13 D birds in challenged groups were orally gavaged with 1 mL bacterial suspension containing approximately 108 CFU Salmonella enterica. The results indicated that chicks challenged with SE impaired performance so that BWG and FI significantly decreased and FCR increased (p < 0.05). Diets containing a high dose of BP increased BW and improved FCR in challenged and unchallenged chickens. The quality of breast meat showed a decline in oxidation in chickens challenged with SE (p < 0.05). The inclusion of bacteriophage in the diet of chickens (1000 g/t) improved the L*, b*, and oxidation of meat. The use of bacteriophage and acidifier A in the diet significantly increased the Lactobacillus, and LAB count, especially in the challenged groups. The challenge of chickens with SE decreased the villus height and crypt depth in different parts of the small intestine (p < 0.05). The results of the present study suggested that 1000 g/t of BP probably improves chicken performance by increasing beneficial bacteria and decreasing pathogenic bacteria. Also, bacteriophage showed an improvement in the performance reduction of chickens with Salmonella infection. In addition, improved meat quality and beneficial changes in the microbiome and intestinal morphology indicate the effectiveness of BP as an alternative antibiotic growth promoter in broiler diets.
期刊介绍:
As an international forum for hypothesis-driven scientific research, the Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition publishes original papers in the fields of animal physiology, biochemistry and physiology of nutrition, animal nutrition, feed technology and preservation (only when related to animal nutrition). Well-conducted scientific work that meets the technical and ethical standards is considered only on the basis of scientific rigor.
Research on farm and companion animals is preferred. Comparative work on exotic species is welcome too. Pharmacological or toxicological experiments with a direct reference to nutrition are also considered. Manuscripts on fish and other aquatic non-mammals with topics on growth or nutrition will not be accepted. Manuscripts may be rejected on the grounds that the subject is too specialized or that the contribution they make to animal physiology and nutrition is insufficient.
In addition, reviews on topics of current interest within the scope of the journal are welcome. Authors are advised to send an outline to the Editorial Office for approval prior to submission.