{"title":"美国成人胆结石的9个肥胖指标的发展和评价。","authors":"Xiaodong Wu, Yanhong Song, Shuodong Wu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gallstones have gradually become a highly prevalent digestive disease worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the association of nine different obesity-related indicators (BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, CMI, VAI, AIP, TyG) with gallstones and to compare their predictive properties for screening gallstones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this study were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the 2017-2020 cycle, and weighted logistic regression analyses with multi-model adjustment were conducted to explore the association of the nine indicators with gallstones. Subject working curves were analyzed to assess the screening ability of the nine indicators. In addition, the association between the most predictive indicator and gallstones was investigated with smooth curve fitting, and differences in risk across populations were explored with subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 3654 participants were involved in the final analysis and 383 (10.48%) carried gallstones. The results of weighted multifactorial logistic regression analysis indicated that BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were independent risk factors for gallstones. The ORs for the highest quartile were 4.13 for RFM, 3.13 for BRI, 2.85 for BMI, 2.86 for WC, 2.45 for LAP, and 1.49 for CMI. The area under the ROC curve for RFM was 0.70. The Delong test compared the performance of different ROCs and revealed that the difference between the area under the curve of RFM and the other metrics was significant ( P < 0.05). Smooth curve fitting suggested a linear positive correlation between RFM and gallstones (LLR > 0.05), especially in women, non-Hispanic White, insufficient physical activity, hypertensive, and diabetic populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFM, BRI, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were essential indicators for recognizing gallstones. By comparison, we realized that RFM was a better predictor of gallstones.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2348-2357"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development and evaluation of nine obesity-based indices for gallstones in U.S. adults.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaodong Wu, Yanhong Song, Shuodong Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gallstones have gradually become a highly prevalent digestive disease worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the association of nine different obesity-related indicators (BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, CMI, VAI, AIP, TyG) with gallstones and to compare their predictive properties for screening gallstones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this study were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the 2017-2020 cycle, and weighted logistic regression analyses with multi-model adjustment were conducted to explore the association of the nine indicators with gallstones. Subject working curves were analyzed to assess the screening ability of the nine indicators. In addition, the association between the most predictive indicator and gallstones was investigated with smooth curve fitting, and differences in risk across populations were explored with subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 3654 participants were involved in the final analysis and 383 (10.48%) carried gallstones. The results of weighted multifactorial logistic regression analysis indicated that BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were independent risk factors for gallstones. The ORs for the highest quartile were 4.13 for RFM, 3.13 for BRI, 2.85 for BMI, 2.86 for WC, 2.45 for LAP, and 1.49 for CMI. The area under the ROC curve for RFM was 0.70. The Delong test compared the performance of different ROCs and revealed that the difference between the area under the curve of RFM and the other metrics was significant ( P < 0.05). Smooth curve fitting suggested a linear positive correlation between RFM and gallstones (LLR > 0.05), especially in women, non-Hispanic White, insufficient physical activity, hypertensive, and diabetic populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFM, BRI, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were essential indicators for recognizing gallstones. By comparison, we realized that RFM was a better predictor of gallstones.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2348-2357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002237\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The development and evaluation of nine obesity-based indices for gallstones in U.S. adults.
Objective: Gallstones have gradually become a highly prevalent digestive disease worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the association of nine different obesity-related indicators (BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, CMI, VAI, AIP, TyG) with gallstones and to compare their predictive properties for screening gallstones.
Methods: Data for this study were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the 2017-2020 cycle, and weighted logistic regression analyses with multi-model adjustment were conducted to explore the association of the nine indicators with gallstones. Subject working curves were analyzed to assess the screening ability of the nine indicators. In addition, the association between the most predictive indicator and gallstones was investigated with smooth curve fitting, and differences in risk across populations were explored with subgroup analyses.
Results: In total, 3654 participants were involved in the final analysis and 383 (10.48%) carried gallstones. The results of weighted multifactorial logistic regression analysis indicated that BRI, RFM, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were independent risk factors for gallstones. The ORs for the highest quartile were 4.13 for RFM, 3.13 for BRI, 2.85 for BMI, 2.86 for WC, 2.45 for LAP, and 1.49 for CMI. The area under the ROC curve for RFM was 0.70. The Delong test compared the performance of different ROCs and revealed that the difference between the area under the curve of RFM and the other metrics was significant ( P < 0.05). Smooth curve fitting suggested a linear positive correlation between RFM and gallstones (LLR > 0.05), especially in women, non-Hispanic White, insufficient physical activity, hypertensive, and diabetic populations.
Conclusion: RFM, BRI, BMI, WC, LAP, and CMI were essential indicators for recognizing gallstones. By comparison, we realized that RFM was a better predictor of gallstones.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.