{"title":"定制CAD/CAM托槽在固定正畸治疗中的疗效：一项系统综述和meta分析。","authors":"Erfan Bardideh, Navid Kerayechian, Mahsa Ghorbani, Farnaz Younessian, Hooman Shafaee","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjae075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent advancements in computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology have led to the development of customized brackets for personalized treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Comparing customized CAD/CAM brackets for their efficacy and effectiveness in orthodontic patients using systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane's CENTRAL up to June 2024, with no language or date restrictions.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Studies that complied with PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) questions were included, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tools were used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Using custom piloted forms, relevant data was retrieved from the included studies. Then a random-effects inverse variance meta-analysis was used to pool the results. The primary outcome was the effectiveness of orthodontic treatment measured by the American Board of Orthodontics cast-radiographic examination (ABO-CRE). Secondary outcomes were overall treatment time and mean number of appointments for CAD/CAM and conventional brackets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included in our final review and meta-analysis. Based on the results of meta-analysis, no significant differences between CAD/CAM and conventional brackets for ABO-CRE score (Mean Difference (MD) = -0.49, Confidence Interval (CI)95% = -4.67, 3.68; P = .82) or number of appointments (MD = -1.88, CI95% = -5.91, 2.16; P = .36) could be found. However, significantly shorter overall treatment time for CAD/CAM brackets were reported (MD = -4.07, CI95% = -7.16, -0.99; P = .010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of our meta-analysis indicate that both bracket types perform comparably in terms of treatment results and the number of clinical appointments required during treatment. Nevertheless, a distinct advantage of CAD/CAM brackets emerged concerning overall treatment duration. Notably, patients using CAD/CAM brackets experienced an average treatment period reduction of approximately 4 months, a clinically significant result.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The protocol for this systematic review was registered at PROSPERO with the ID CRD42024605257.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy and effectiveness of customized CAD/CAM brackets in fixed orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Erfan Bardideh, Navid Kerayechian, Mahsa Ghorbani, Farnaz Younessian, Hooman Shafaee\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejo/cjae075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent advancements in computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology have led to the development of customized brackets for personalized treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Comparing customized CAD/CAM brackets for their efficacy and effectiveness in orthodontic patients using systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane's CENTRAL up to June 2024, with no language or date restrictions.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Studies that complied with PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) questions were included, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tools were used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Using custom piloted forms, relevant data was retrieved from the included studies. Then a random-effects inverse variance meta-analysis was used to pool the results. The primary outcome was the effectiveness of orthodontic treatment measured by the American Board of Orthodontics cast-radiographic examination (ABO-CRE). Secondary outcomes were overall treatment time and mean number of appointments for CAD/CAM and conventional brackets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies were included in our final review and meta-analysis. Based on the results of meta-analysis, no significant differences between CAD/CAM and conventional brackets for ABO-CRE score (Mean Difference (MD) = -0.49, Confidence Interval (CI)95% = -4.67, 3.68; P = .82) or number of appointments (MD = -1.88, CI95% = -5.91, 2.16; P = .36) could be found. However, significantly shorter overall treatment time for CAD/CAM brackets were reported (MD = -4.07, CI95% = -7.16, -0.99; P = .010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of our meta-analysis indicate that both bracket types perform comparably in terms of treatment results and the number of clinical appointments required during treatment. Nevertheless, a distinct advantage of CAD/CAM brackets emerged concerning overall treatment duration. Notably, patients using CAD/CAM brackets experienced an average treatment period reduction of approximately 4 months, a clinically significant result.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The protocol for this systematic review was registered at PROSPERO with the ID CRD42024605257.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjae075\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjae075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The efficacy and effectiveness of customized CAD/CAM brackets in fixed orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Recent advancements in computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology have led to the development of customized brackets for personalized treatment.
Objective: Comparing customized CAD/CAM brackets for their efficacy and effectiveness in orthodontic patients using systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.
Search methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane's CENTRAL up to June 2024, with no language or date restrictions.
Selection criteria: Studies that complied with PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) questions were included, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tools were used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.
Data collection and analysis: Using custom piloted forms, relevant data was retrieved from the included studies. Then a random-effects inverse variance meta-analysis was used to pool the results. The primary outcome was the effectiveness of orthodontic treatment measured by the American Board of Orthodontics cast-radiographic examination (ABO-CRE). Secondary outcomes were overall treatment time and mean number of appointments for CAD/CAM and conventional brackets.
Results: Six studies were included in our final review and meta-analysis. Based on the results of meta-analysis, no significant differences between CAD/CAM and conventional brackets for ABO-CRE score (Mean Difference (MD) = -0.49, Confidence Interval (CI)95% = -4.67, 3.68; P = .82) or number of appointments (MD = -1.88, CI95% = -5.91, 2.16; P = .36) could be found. However, significantly shorter overall treatment time for CAD/CAM brackets were reported (MD = -4.07, CI95% = -7.16, -0.99; P = .010).
Conclusions: The findings of our meta-analysis indicate that both bracket types perform comparably in terms of treatment results and the number of clinical appointments required during treatment. Nevertheless, a distinct advantage of CAD/CAM brackets emerged concerning overall treatment duration. Notably, patients using CAD/CAM brackets experienced an average treatment period reduction of approximately 4 months, a clinically significant result.
Registration: The protocol for this systematic review was registered at PROSPERO with the ID CRD42024605257.
期刊介绍：
The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
