重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对健康成人DLPFC的神经增强。

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Cognitive Neurodynamics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s11571-024-10195-w
Elias Ebrahimzadeh, Seyyed Mostafa Sadjadi, Mostafa Asgarinejad, Amin Dehghani, Lila Rajabion, Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
{"title":"重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对健康成人DLPFC的神经增强。","authors":"Elias Ebrahimzadeh, Seyyed Mostafa Sadjadi, Mostafa Asgarinejad, Amin Dehghani, Lila Rajabion, Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh","doi":"10.1007/s11571-024-10195-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term \"neuroenhancement\" describes the enhancement of cognitive function associated with deficiencies resulting from a specific condition. Nevertheless, there is currently no agreed-upon definition for the term \"neuroenhancement\", and its meaning can change based on the specific research being discussed. As humans, our continual pursuit of expanding our capabilities, encompassing both cognitive and motor skills, has led us to explore various tools. Among these, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) stands out, yet its potential remains underestimated. Historically, rTMS was predominantly employed in studies focused on rehabilitation objectives. A small amount of research has examined its use on healthy subjects with the goal of improving cognitive abilities like risk-seeking, working memory, attention, cognitive control, learning, computing speed, and decision-making. It appears that the insights gained in this domain largely stem from indirect outcomes of rehabilitation research. This review aims to scrutinize these studies, assessing the effectiveness of rTMS in enhancing cognitive skills in healthy subjects. Given that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has become a popular focus for rTMS in treating psychiatric disorders, corresponding anatomically to Brodmann areas 9 and 46, and considering the documented success of rTMS stimulation on the DLPFC for cognitive improvement, our focus in this review article centers on the DLPFC as the focal point and region of interest. Additionally, recognizing the significance of theta burst magnetic stimulation protocols (TBS) in mimicking the natural firing patterns of the brain to modulate excitability in specific cortical areas with precision, we have incorporated Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) wave patterns. This inclusion, mirroring brain patterns, is intended to enhance the efficacy of the rTMS method. To ascertain if brain magnetic stimulation consistently improves cognition, a thorough meta-analysis of the existing literature has been conducted. The findings indicate that, after excluding outlier studies, rTMS may improve cognition when compared to appropriate control circumstances. However, there is also a considerable degree of variation among the researches. The navigation strategy used to reach the stimulation site and the stimulation location are important factors that contribute to the variation between studies. The results of this study can provide professional athletes, firefighters, bodyguards, and therapists-among others in high-risk professions-with insightful information that can help them perform better on the job.</p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"19 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroenhancement by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on DLPFC in healthy adults.\",\"authors\":\"Elias Ebrahimzadeh, Seyyed Mostafa Sadjadi, Mostafa Asgarinejad, Amin Dehghani, Lila Rajabion, Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11571-024-10195-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The term \\\"neuroenhancement\\\" describes the enhancement of cognitive function associated with deficiencies resulting from a specific condition. Nevertheless, there is currently no agreed-upon definition for the term \\\"neuroenhancement\\\", and its meaning can change based on the specific research being discussed. As humans, our continual pursuit of expanding our capabilities, encompassing both cognitive and motor skills, has led us to explore various tools. Among these, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) stands out, yet its potential remains underestimated. Historically, rTMS was predominantly employed in studies focused on rehabilitation objectives. A small amount of research has examined its use on healthy subjects with the goal of improving cognitive abilities like risk-seeking, working memory, attention, cognitive control, learning, computing speed, and decision-making. It appears that the insights gained in this domain largely stem from indirect outcomes of rehabilitation research. This review aims to scrutinize these studies, assessing the effectiveness of rTMS in enhancing cognitive skills in healthy subjects. Given that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has become a popular focus for rTMS in treating psychiatric disorders, corresponding anatomically to Brodmann areas 9 and 46, and considering the documented success of rTMS stimulation on the DLPFC for cognitive improvement, our focus in this review article centers on the DLPFC as the focal point and region of interest. Additionally, recognizing the significance of theta burst magnetic stimulation protocols (TBS) in mimicking the natural firing patterns of the brain to modulate excitability in specific cortical areas with precision, we have incorporated Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) wave patterns. This inclusion, mirroring brain patterns, is intended to enhance the efficacy of the rTMS method. To ascertain if brain magnetic stimulation consistently improves cognition, a thorough meta-analysis of the existing literature has been conducted. The findings indicate that, after excluding outlier studies, rTMS may improve cognition when compared to appropriate control circumstances. However, there is also a considerable degree of variation among the researches. The navigation strategy used to reach the stimulation site and the stimulation location are important factors that contribute to the variation between studies. The results of this study can provide professional athletes, firefighters, bodyguards, and therapists-among others in high-risk professions-with insightful information that can help them perform better on the job.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neurodynamics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neurodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10195-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10195-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“神经增强”一词描述了由特定疾病引起的认知功能缺陷的增强。然而,“神经增强”一词目前还没有一个公认的定义,它的含义可以根据正在讨论的具体研究而改变。作为人类,我们不断追求扩展我们的能力,包括认知和运动技能,这促使我们探索各种工具。其中,重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)最为突出,但其潜力仍被低估。从历史上看,rTMS主要用于专注于康复目标的研究。少量研究已经检验了它在健康受试者身上的应用,目的是提高风险寻求、工作记忆、注意力、认知控制、学习、计算速度和决策等认知能力。在这一领域获得的见解似乎主要来自康复研究的间接结果。本文旨在回顾这些研究,评估rTMS在提高健康受试者认知技能方面的有效性。考虑到背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)已成为rTMS治疗精神疾病的热门焦点,在解剖学上对应于Brodmann区9和46,并考虑到rTMS刺激DLPFC在认知改善方面的成功记录,我们在这篇回顾文章中的重点集中在DLPFC作为焦点和感兴趣的区域。此外,认识到theta爆发磁刺激方案(TBS)在模拟大脑自然放电模式以精确调节特定皮质区域的兴奋性方面的重要性,我们将theta爆发磁刺激(TBS)波形纳入其中。这种包含,反映大脑模式,旨在提高rTMS方法的功效。为了确定脑磁刺激是否能持续改善认知,对现有文献进行了全面的荟萃分析。研究结果表明,在排除异常研究后,与适当的控制环境相比,rTMS可能会改善认知。然而,各研究之间也存在相当程度的差异。到达刺激点的导航策略和刺激位置是导致研究之间差异的重要因素。这项研究的结果可以为职业运动员、消防员、保镖和治疗师等高危职业提供有见地的信息,帮助他们在工作中表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuroenhancement by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on DLPFC in healthy adults.

The term "neuroenhancement" describes the enhancement of cognitive function associated with deficiencies resulting from a specific condition. Nevertheless, there is currently no agreed-upon definition for the term "neuroenhancement", and its meaning can change based on the specific research being discussed. As humans, our continual pursuit of expanding our capabilities, encompassing both cognitive and motor skills, has led us to explore various tools. Among these, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) stands out, yet its potential remains underestimated. Historically, rTMS was predominantly employed in studies focused on rehabilitation objectives. A small amount of research has examined its use on healthy subjects with the goal of improving cognitive abilities like risk-seeking, working memory, attention, cognitive control, learning, computing speed, and decision-making. It appears that the insights gained in this domain largely stem from indirect outcomes of rehabilitation research. This review aims to scrutinize these studies, assessing the effectiveness of rTMS in enhancing cognitive skills in healthy subjects. Given that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has become a popular focus for rTMS in treating psychiatric disorders, corresponding anatomically to Brodmann areas 9 and 46, and considering the documented success of rTMS stimulation on the DLPFC for cognitive improvement, our focus in this review article centers on the DLPFC as the focal point and region of interest. Additionally, recognizing the significance of theta burst magnetic stimulation protocols (TBS) in mimicking the natural firing patterns of the brain to modulate excitability in specific cortical areas with precision, we have incorporated Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) wave patterns. This inclusion, mirroring brain patterns, is intended to enhance the efficacy of the rTMS method. To ascertain if brain magnetic stimulation consistently improves cognition, a thorough meta-analysis of the existing literature has been conducted. The findings indicate that, after excluding outlier studies, rTMS may improve cognition when compared to appropriate control circumstances. However, there is also a considerable degree of variation among the researches. The navigation strategy used to reach the stimulation site and the stimulation location are important factors that contribute to the variation between studies. The results of this study can provide professional athletes, firefighters, bodyguards, and therapists-among others in high-risk professions-with insightful information that can help them perform better on the job.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neurodynamics
Cognitive Neurodynamics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
18.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models. The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome. The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged. 1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics. 2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages. 3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信