评估严重精神疾病的临床生命体征:监测肌肉力量的5个坐立测试的验证研究-精神活动项目。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.842
Alvaro Lopez-Moral, Diego Munguia-Izquierdo, Javier Bueno-Antequera
{"title":"评估严重精神疾病的临床生命体征:监测肌肉力量的5个坐立测试的验证研究-精神活动项目。","authors":"Alvaro Lopez-Moral, Diego Munguia-Izquierdo, Javier Bueno-Antequera","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In individuals with severe mental illness (SMI), low muscle strength heightens the risk of mortality and chronic disease development. Routine muscle strength assessments could identify vulnerabilities, thereby reducing the growing burden associated with SMI. However, integration into clinical settings faces obstacles because of limited resources and inadequate healthcare staff training. The 5 sit-to-stand (5-STS) test offers an alternative for measuring muscle strength compared with more complex or demanding tests. Nevertheless, its validity in individuals with SMI remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to analyse the criterion validity of the 5-STS test in SMI, considering potential age, gender and body mass index influences.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a cross-sectional study following the 'STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology' (STROBE) guidelines, 82 adults with SMI (aged 18-65, 24 women) were assessed. Participants underwent both the 5-STS test and the isometric knee extension strength (KES) test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed a significant moderate correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (-0.58 for both) for all participants, indicating that the measures are valid and assess related aspects of the same construct. Strong agreement was observed in women and the older age groups. The 5-STS test demonstrated accuracy, with a standard error of estimate lower than the within-subject variability on the KES test. Bland-Altman plots showed limits of agreement values of -3.39 and 3.52 for the entire sample, and heteroscedasticity analyses indicated consistent differences between the 5-STS and KES tests across all groups analysed, except in the women's group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 5-STS test seems to be a valid test for assessing muscle strength in individuals with SMI, supporting its usefulness for routine assessment in clinical settings, facilitating detection and intervention in critical situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"e24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing a clinical vital sign in severe mental illness: validation study of the 5 sit-to-stand test for monitoring muscle strength - The PsychiActive Project.\",\"authors\":\"Alvaro Lopez-Moral, Diego Munguia-Izquierdo, Javier Bueno-Antequera\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2024.842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In individuals with severe mental illness (SMI), low muscle strength heightens the risk of mortality and chronic disease development. Routine muscle strength assessments could identify vulnerabilities, thereby reducing the growing burden associated with SMI. However, integration into clinical settings faces obstacles because of limited resources and inadequate healthcare staff training. The 5 sit-to-stand (5-STS) test offers an alternative for measuring muscle strength compared with more complex or demanding tests. Nevertheless, its validity in individuals with SMI remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to analyse the criterion validity of the 5-STS test in SMI, considering potential age, gender and body mass index influences.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a cross-sectional study following the 'STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology' (STROBE) guidelines, 82 adults with SMI (aged 18-65, 24 women) were assessed. Participants underwent both the 5-STS test and the isometric knee extension strength (KES) test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed a significant moderate correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (-0.58 for both) for all participants, indicating that the measures are valid and assess related aspects of the same construct. Strong agreement was observed in women and the older age groups. The 5-STS test demonstrated accuracy, with a standard error of estimate lower than the within-subject variability on the KES test. Bland-Altman plots showed limits of agreement values of -3.39 and 3.52 for the entire sample, and heteroscedasticity analyses indicated consistent differences between the 5-STS and KES tests across all groups analysed, except in the women's group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 5-STS test seems to be a valid test for assessing muscle strength in individuals with SMI, supporting its usefulness for routine assessment in clinical settings, facilitating detection and intervention in critical situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"e24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823003/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.842\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的个体中,低肌肉力量会增加死亡和慢性疾病发展的风险。常规肌肉力量评估可以识别脆弱性,从而减少与重度精神分裂症相关的日益增长的负担。然而,由于资源有限和医护人员培训不足,融入临床环境面临障碍。与更复杂或要求更高的测试相比,5坐立(5- sts)测试提供了一种测量肌肉力量的替代方法。然而,其在重度精神障碍患者中的有效性仍未得到探索。目的:本研究旨在分析5-STS测试在重度精神分裂症中的效度,考虑年龄、性别和体重指数的潜在影响。方法:在一项遵循“加强流行病学观察性研究报告”(STROBE)指南的横断面研究中,对82名重度精神障碍成人(18-65岁,24名女性)进行了评估。参与者进行了5-STS测试和等长膝关节伸展强度(KES)测试。结果:分析显示所有参与者均有显著的中等相关系数和类内相关系数(两者均为-0.58),表明测量有效并且评估相同结构的相关方面。在妇女和老年群体中观察到强烈的一致。5-STS测试证明了准确性,其估计的标准误差低于KES测试的受试者内部变异性。Bland-Altman图显示整个样本的一致性值限为-3.39和3.52,异方差分析表明,除女性组外,所有分析组的5-STS和KES检验之间存在一致的差异。结论:5-STS测试似乎是评估重度精神障碍个体肌肉力量的有效测试,支持其在临床常规评估中的有效性,有助于在危急情况下发现和干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing a clinical vital sign in severe mental illness: validation study of the 5 sit-to-stand test for monitoring muscle strength - The PsychiActive Project.

Background: In individuals with severe mental illness (SMI), low muscle strength heightens the risk of mortality and chronic disease development. Routine muscle strength assessments could identify vulnerabilities, thereby reducing the growing burden associated with SMI. However, integration into clinical settings faces obstacles because of limited resources and inadequate healthcare staff training. The 5 sit-to-stand (5-STS) test offers an alternative for measuring muscle strength compared with more complex or demanding tests. Nevertheless, its validity in individuals with SMI remains unexplored.

Aims: This study aimed to analyse the criterion validity of the 5-STS test in SMI, considering potential age, gender and body mass index influences.

Method: In a cross-sectional study following the 'STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology' (STROBE) guidelines, 82 adults with SMI (aged 18-65, 24 women) were assessed. Participants underwent both the 5-STS test and the isometric knee extension strength (KES) test.

Results: Analysis revealed a significant moderate correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (-0.58 for both) for all participants, indicating that the measures are valid and assess related aspects of the same construct. Strong agreement was observed in women and the older age groups. The 5-STS test demonstrated accuracy, with a standard error of estimate lower than the within-subject variability on the KES test. Bland-Altman plots showed limits of agreement values of -3.39 and 3.52 for the entire sample, and heteroscedasticity analyses indicated consistent differences between the 5-STS and KES tests across all groups analysed, except in the women's group.

Conclusions: The 5-STS test seems to be a valid test for assessing muscle strength in individuals with SMI, supporting its usefulness for routine assessment in clinical settings, facilitating detection and intervention in critical situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信