澳大利亚男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者的社会支持和LGBTQ +社区参与模式及其对hiv相关结果的影响:一项潜在类别分析

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Curtis Chan, Benjamin R. Bavinton, Horas T. H. Wong, John Rule, Loc Nguyen, Steven Spencer, Martin Holt
{"title":"澳大利亚男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者的社会支持和LGBTQ +社区参与模式及其对hiv相关结果的影响:一项潜在类别分析","authors":"Curtis Chan,&nbsp;Benjamin R. Bavinton,&nbsp;Horas T. H. Wong,&nbsp;John Rule,&nbsp;Loc Nguyen,&nbsp;Steven Spencer,&nbsp;Martin Holt","doi":"10.1007/s10461-025-04632-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Peer support from social networks of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) has been recognised as a critical driver of engagement with HIV prevention. Using data from an online cross-sectional survey of 1,032 GBMSM aged 18 or over in Australia, a latent class analysis was conducted to categorise participants based on social support, LGBTQ + community involvement, and social engagement with gay men and LGBTQ + people. Comparisons between classes were assessed using multivariable multinomial logistic regression. Participants were allocated into four classes: ‘Gay men focused’ (<i>n</i> = 293, 28.4%) with high levels of support from gay men, ‘High and diverse’ (<i>n</i> = 75, 7.3%) with high support from people with a range of gender and sexual identities, ‘Moderate overall’ (<i>n</i> = 177, 17.2%) who reported some support from all sources, and ‘Low overall’ (<i>n</i> = 487, 47.2%) who had low support. Lifetime HIV testing was lower in the ‘Low overall’ (78.0%) and ‘Moderate overall’ (81.9%) classes compared to the ‘Gay men focused’ (96.9%) and ‘High and diverse’ (93.3%) groups. Among non-HIV-positive participants (<i>n</i> = 971), lifetime PrEP use was lower in the ‘Low overall’ (28.9%) than the ‘Gay men focused’ group (56.2%) but similar in the ‘High and diverse’ (59.7%) and ‘Moderate overall’ (37.5%) groups. Greater levels of social engagement with gay men and LGBTQ + people were associated with higher levels of HIV testing and PrEP use. Interventions are needed to reach GBM who are less engaged with GBMSM networks or LGBTQ + communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":"29 5","pages":"1619 - 1628"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10461-025-04632-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Social Support and LGBTQ + Community Involvement Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men in Australia and Their Effect on HIV-Related Outcomes: A Latent Class Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Curtis Chan,&nbsp;Benjamin R. Bavinton,&nbsp;Horas T. H. Wong,&nbsp;John Rule,&nbsp;Loc Nguyen,&nbsp;Steven Spencer,&nbsp;Martin Holt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10461-025-04632-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Peer support from social networks of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) has been recognised as a critical driver of engagement with HIV prevention. Using data from an online cross-sectional survey of 1,032 GBMSM aged 18 or over in Australia, a latent class analysis was conducted to categorise participants based on social support, LGBTQ + community involvement, and social engagement with gay men and LGBTQ + people. Comparisons between classes were assessed using multivariable multinomial logistic regression. Participants were allocated into four classes: ‘Gay men focused’ (<i>n</i> = 293, 28.4%) with high levels of support from gay men, ‘High and diverse’ (<i>n</i> = 75, 7.3%) with high support from people with a range of gender and sexual identities, ‘Moderate overall’ (<i>n</i> = 177, 17.2%) who reported some support from all sources, and ‘Low overall’ (<i>n</i> = 487, 47.2%) who had low support. Lifetime HIV testing was lower in the ‘Low overall’ (78.0%) and ‘Moderate overall’ (81.9%) classes compared to the ‘Gay men focused’ (96.9%) and ‘High and diverse’ (93.3%) groups. Among non-HIV-positive participants (<i>n</i> = 971), lifetime PrEP use was lower in the ‘Low overall’ (28.9%) than the ‘Gay men focused’ group (56.2%) but similar in the ‘High and diverse’ (59.7%) and ‘Moderate overall’ (37.5%) groups. Greater levels of social engagement with gay men and LGBTQ + people were associated with higher levels of HIV testing and PrEP use. Interventions are needed to reach GBM who are less engaged with GBMSM networks or LGBTQ + communities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"1619 - 1628\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10461-025-04632-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10461-025-04632-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10461-025-04632-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)社会网络的同伴支持已被认为是参与艾滋病毒预防的关键驱动因素。利用对澳大利亚1032名18岁或以上的gbsm进行的在线横断面调查的数据,进行了潜在阶级分析,根据社会支持、LGBTQ +社区参与以及与男同性恋者和LGBTQ +人群的社会参与对参与者进行了分类。使用多变量多项逻辑回归评估类别间的比较。参与者被分为四类:“关注男同性恋者”(n = 293, 28.4%),获得男同性恋者的高度支持;“高度多样化”(n = 75, 7.3%),获得各种性别和性身份的高度支持;“总体中等”(n = 177, 17.2%),报告从所有来源获得一些支持;“总体低”(n = 487, 47.2%),获得低支持。终生艾滋病毒检测在“低总体”(78.0%)和“中等总体”(81.9%)类别中低于“男同性恋者”(96.9%)和“高和多样化”(93.3%)群体。在非艾滋病毒阳性参与者(n = 971)中,“总体低”(28.9%)的终生PrEP使用率低于“男同性恋者”组(56.2%),但“高和多样化”组(59.7%)和“总体中等”组(37.5%)相似。与男同性恋者和LGBTQ +人群更多的社会接触与更高水平的艾滋病毒检测和PrEP使用有关。需要采取干预措施,以接触那些较少参与gbbmsm网络或LGBTQ +社区的gbmm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of Social Support and LGBTQ + Community Involvement Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men in Australia and Their Effect on HIV-Related Outcomes: A Latent Class Analysis

Peer support from social networks of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) has been recognised as a critical driver of engagement with HIV prevention. Using data from an online cross-sectional survey of 1,032 GBMSM aged 18 or over in Australia, a latent class analysis was conducted to categorise participants based on social support, LGBTQ + community involvement, and social engagement with gay men and LGBTQ + people. Comparisons between classes were assessed using multivariable multinomial logistic regression. Participants were allocated into four classes: ‘Gay men focused’ (n = 293, 28.4%) with high levels of support from gay men, ‘High and diverse’ (n = 75, 7.3%) with high support from people with a range of gender and sexual identities, ‘Moderate overall’ (n = 177, 17.2%) who reported some support from all sources, and ‘Low overall’ (n = 487, 47.2%) who had low support. Lifetime HIV testing was lower in the ‘Low overall’ (78.0%) and ‘Moderate overall’ (81.9%) classes compared to the ‘Gay men focused’ (96.9%) and ‘High and diverse’ (93.3%) groups. Among non-HIV-positive participants (n = 971), lifetime PrEP use was lower in the ‘Low overall’ (28.9%) than the ‘Gay men focused’ group (56.2%) but similar in the ‘High and diverse’ (59.7%) and ‘Moderate overall’ (37.5%) groups. Greater levels of social engagement with gay men and LGBTQ + people were associated with higher levels of HIV testing and PrEP use. Interventions are needed to reach GBM who are less engaged with GBMSM networks or LGBTQ + communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信