[PMS2和MSH6双抗体检测在错配修复缺陷肿瘤筛查中的应用]。

Q3 Medicine
C S Wang, B Zhang, Q Sun, J Yang, X B Cui, H Y Wu
{"title":"[PMS2和MSH6双抗体检测在错配修复缺陷肿瘤筛查中的应用]。","authors":"C S Wang, B Zhang, Q Sun, J Yang, X B Cui, H Y Wu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20240531-00354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate whether the immunohistochemical results of two markers PMS2 and MSH6 (2-MMR) could replace the four markers MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 (4-MMR) to detect mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) cancers. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted with summary of immunohistochemical data from 7 867 cases of gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, and other diseases in the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China, from March 2018 to March 2023. The consistency of 2-MMR and 4-MMR results was examined. Microsatellite instability (MSI) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed in patients with specific phenotypes. <b>Results:</b> The Cohen κ values of 2-MMR and 4-MMR in gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer and other diseases were 0.88, 0.99, 0.88 and 1.00, respectively. The overall consistency, sensitivity and specificity were 0.97, 99.6%, and 100.0%, respectively. Both 2-MMR and 4-MMR could detect the difference between various clinicopathological features. 24 (0.3%) of the 7 867 patients were found to have a special phenotype of MMR, and 6 of them were selected for MSI and NGS molecular testing. MSI analysis showed MSI-H in all cases, while NGS found that 5 of them had MMR-related gene mutations and 1 had POLE p.S297F mutation. <b>Conclusions:</b> Compared with 4-MMR, 2-MMR has high consistency, specificity and sensitivity. The cases with special phenotype only account for extremely low proportion. Therefore, 4-MMR may be replaced with 2-MMR in dMMR screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":35997,"journal":{"name":"中华病理学杂志","volume":"54 2","pages":"126-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Application of PMS2 and MSH6 double-antibody detection in screening of mismatch repair deficient tumors].\",\"authors\":\"C S Wang, B Zhang, Q Sun, J Yang, X B Cui, H Y Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20240531-00354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate whether the immunohistochemical results of two markers PMS2 and MSH6 (2-MMR) could replace the four markers MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 (4-MMR) to detect mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) cancers. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted with summary of immunohistochemical data from 7 867 cases of gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, and other diseases in the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China, from March 2018 to March 2023. The consistency of 2-MMR and 4-MMR results was examined. Microsatellite instability (MSI) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed in patients with specific phenotypes. <b>Results:</b> The Cohen κ values of 2-MMR and 4-MMR in gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer and other diseases were 0.88, 0.99, 0.88 and 1.00, respectively. The overall consistency, sensitivity and specificity were 0.97, 99.6%, and 100.0%, respectively. Both 2-MMR and 4-MMR could detect the difference between various clinicopathological features. 24 (0.3%) of the 7 867 patients were found to have a special phenotype of MMR, and 6 of them were selected for MSI and NGS molecular testing. MSI analysis showed MSI-H in all cases, while NGS found that 5 of them had MMR-related gene mutations and 1 had POLE p.S297F mutation. <b>Conclusions:</b> Compared with 4-MMR, 2-MMR has high consistency, specificity and sensitivity. The cases with special phenotype only account for extremely low proportion. Therefore, 4-MMR may be replaced with 2-MMR in dMMR screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华病理学杂志\",\"volume\":\"54 2\",\"pages\":\"126-134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华病理学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20240531-00354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华病理学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20240531-00354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨PMS2和MSH6 (2-MMR)两种标记物的免疫组化结果是否可以替代MLH1、PMS2、MSH2和MSH6 (4-MMR)四种标记物检测错配修复缺陷(dMMR)癌症。方法:回顾性分析南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院2018年3月至2023年3月7 867例胃癌、结直肠癌、子宫内膜癌等疾病患者的免疫组化资料。检查2-MMR和4-MMR结果的一致性。对具有特定表型的患者进行微卫星不稳定性(MSI)和下一代测序(NGS)。结果:2-MMR和4-MMR在胃癌、结直肠癌、子宫内膜癌等疾病中的Cohen κ值分别为0.88、0.99、0.88和1.00。总体一致性、敏感性和特异性分别为0.97、99.6%和100.0%。2-MMR和4-MMR均能检测出各种临床病理特征之间的差异。7 867例患者中发现MMR特殊表型24例(0.3%),选择其中6例进行MSI和NGS分子检测。MSI分析显示所有病例均为MSI- h,而NGS发现其中5例有mmr相关基因突变,1例有POLE p.S297F突变。结论:与4-MMR相比,2-MMR具有较高的一致性、特异性和敏感性。具有特殊表型的病例所占比例极低。因此,在dMMR筛选中,可以用2-MMR代替4-MMR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Application of PMS2 and MSH6 double-antibody detection in screening of mismatch repair deficient tumors].

Objective: To investigate whether the immunohistochemical results of two markers PMS2 and MSH6 (2-MMR) could replace the four markers MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 (4-MMR) to detect mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) cancers. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted with summary of immunohistochemical data from 7 867 cases of gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, and other diseases in the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China, from March 2018 to March 2023. The consistency of 2-MMR and 4-MMR results was examined. Microsatellite instability (MSI) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed in patients with specific phenotypes. Results: The Cohen κ values of 2-MMR and 4-MMR in gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer and other diseases were 0.88, 0.99, 0.88 and 1.00, respectively. The overall consistency, sensitivity and specificity were 0.97, 99.6%, and 100.0%, respectively. Both 2-MMR and 4-MMR could detect the difference between various clinicopathological features. 24 (0.3%) of the 7 867 patients were found to have a special phenotype of MMR, and 6 of them were selected for MSI and NGS molecular testing. MSI analysis showed MSI-H in all cases, while NGS found that 5 of them had MMR-related gene mutations and 1 had POLE p.S297F mutation. Conclusions: Compared with 4-MMR, 2-MMR has high consistency, specificity and sensitivity. The cases with special phenotype only account for extremely low proportion. Therefore, 4-MMR may be replaced with 2-MMR in dMMR screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华病理学杂志
中华病理学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10377
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信