危地马拉西南部农村社区家畜、体外寄生虫及其主人中选定病媒传播病原体的检测

IF 1.4 Q3 PARASITOLOGY
A. Valeria Scorza , Rebekah J. McMinn , Andrea Chacon , Molly M. Lamb , Ramon E. Medrano , Emma K. Harris , Danilo Alvarez , Maria Renee Lopez , Kareen Arias , Jose Anaya , Daniel Olson , Gregory D. Ebel , Michael R. Lappin
{"title":"危地马拉西南部农村社区家畜、体外寄生虫及其主人中选定病媒传播病原体的检测","authors":"A. Valeria Scorza ,&nbsp;Rebekah J. McMinn ,&nbsp;Andrea Chacon ,&nbsp;Molly M. Lamb ,&nbsp;Ramon E. Medrano ,&nbsp;Emma K. Harris ,&nbsp;Danilo Alvarez ,&nbsp;Maria Renee Lopez ,&nbsp;Kareen Arias ,&nbsp;Jose Anaya ,&nbsp;Daniel Olson ,&nbsp;Gregory D. Ebel ,&nbsp;Michael R. Lappin","doi":"10.1016/j.vprsr.2024.101185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vector-borne pathogens, which are transmitted by blood-feeding arthropods to animals and people, are common in tropical regions where, combined with economic factors, can cause significant public health burden. A community-level study was undertaken in southwestern Guatemala to assess the presence of vector-borne pathogens in blood samples from humans (<em>n</em> = 98), their animals (<em>n</em> = 90), and ectoparasites (<em>n</em> = 83) over a period of 2 weeks. Human capillary blood was collected from participant's index finger, and animal venous blood (chickens, pigs, dogs, and cats) was collected from the jugular or cephalic veins at the enrollment period of a concurrent study. Ectoparasites (fleas, ticks, and lice) were collected from dogs at the time of the blood collection. Total DNA was extracted from the human blood, animal blood, and ectoparasites and assayed using published PCR assays for <em>Anaplasma</em> spp., <em>Bartonella</em> spp., and <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp. Ectoparasites were also tested for the presence of <em>Rickettsia</em> spp. DNA by PCR. <em>Anaplasma</em> spp. DNA was amplified from 1 of 39 (2.6 %) chickens and 1 of 6 (16.6 %) turkeys. All human and dog blood samples were negative for <em>Bartonella</em> spp. in the same community. <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp. DNA was amplified from 12 (60 %) of 20 dogs and sequencing documented <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp. in 2 dogs and the ticks and fleas collected from these dogs. All the <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp.-positive sequences showed 100 % homology to <em>E. canis</em> sequences and other uncultured <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp. strains isolated from animals. <em>Rickettsia</em> spp. DNA was not amplified from any of the ectoparasites assessed. Our findings suggest that <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp. are common in dogs and <em>Anaplasma</em> spp. are circulating in poultry in a rural community in southwest Guatemala. We expect these results to be used in awareness campaigns and public health interventions to reduce vector borne pathogens in the region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23600,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of selected vector-borne pathogens in domestic animals, ectoparasites, and their owners in a rural community in Southwest Guatemala\",\"authors\":\"A. Valeria Scorza ,&nbsp;Rebekah J. McMinn ,&nbsp;Andrea Chacon ,&nbsp;Molly M. Lamb ,&nbsp;Ramon E. Medrano ,&nbsp;Emma K. Harris ,&nbsp;Danilo Alvarez ,&nbsp;Maria Renee Lopez ,&nbsp;Kareen Arias ,&nbsp;Jose Anaya ,&nbsp;Daniel Olson ,&nbsp;Gregory D. Ebel ,&nbsp;Michael R. Lappin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vprsr.2024.101185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Vector-borne pathogens, which are transmitted by blood-feeding arthropods to animals and people, are common in tropical regions where, combined with economic factors, can cause significant public health burden. A community-level study was undertaken in southwestern Guatemala to assess the presence of vector-borne pathogens in blood samples from humans (<em>n</em> = 98), their animals (<em>n</em> = 90), and ectoparasites (<em>n</em> = 83) over a period of 2 weeks. Human capillary blood was collected from participant's index finger, and animal venous blood (chickens, pigs, dogs, and cats) was collected from the jugular or cephalic veins at the enrollment period of a concurrent study. Ectoparasites (fleas, ticks, and lice) were collected from dogs at the time of the blood collection. Total DNA was extracted from the human blood, animal blood, and ectoparasites and assayed using published PCR assays for <em>Anaplasma</em> spp., <em>Bartonella</em> spp., and <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp. Ectoparasites were also tested for the presence of <em>Rickettsia</em> spp. DNA by PCR. <em>Anaplasma</em> spp. DNA was amplified from 1 of 39 (2.6 %) chickens and 1 of 6 (16.6 %) turkeys. All human and dog blood samples were negative for <em>Bartonella</em> spp. in the same community. <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp. DNA was amplified from 12 (60 %) of 20 dogs and sequencing documented <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp. in 2 dogs and the ticks and fleas collected from these dogs. All the <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp.-positive sequences showed 100 % homology to <em>E. canis</em> sequences and other uncultured <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp. strains isolated from animals. <em>Rickettsia</em> spp. DNA was not amplified from any of the ectoparasites assessed. Our findings suggest that <em>Ehrlichia</em> spp. are common in dogs and <em>Anaplasma</em> spp. are circulating in poultry in a rural community in southwest Guatemala. We expect these results to be used in awareness campaigns and public health interventions to reduce vector borne pathogens in the region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405939024002211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405939024002211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

病媒传播的病原体通过吸血节肢动物传播给动物和人,在热带地区很常见,再加上经济因素,可造成重大的公共卫生负担。在危地马拉西南部进行了一项社区水平的研究,以评估在2周内来自人类(n = 98)、他们的动物(n = 90)和体外寄生虫(n = 83)的血液样本中媒介传播病原体的存在。在同时进行的一项研究的入组期间,从受试者的食指采集人毛细血管血,从颈静脉或头静脉采集动物静脉血(鸡、猪、狗和猫)。体外寄生虫(跳蚤、蜱虫和虱子)在采集血液时从狗身上收集。从人血、动物血和体外寄生虫中提取总DNA,并采用已发表的PCR方法检测无原体、巴尔通体和埃利希体,同时用PCR方法检测体外寄生虫中立克次体的DNA。39只鸡中有1只(2.6%)和6只火鸡中有1只(16.6%)扩增出无原体的DNA。同一社区所有人和狗的血样巴尔通体均呈阴性。对20只犬中的12只(60%)进行了埃利希体DNA扩增,测序结果显示2只犬携带埃利希体,蜱虫和跳蚤也携带埃利希体。所有阳性序列均与犬伊氏埃利希体及其他动物分离的未培养埃利希体菌株具有100%的同源性。没有从评估的任何体外寄生虫中扩增立克次体的DNA。我们的研究结果表明,埃利希体在狗中很常见,无原体在危地马拉西南部农村社区的家禽中流行。我们期望这些结果将用于提高认识运动和公共卫生干预,以减少该区域的媒介传播病原体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of selected vector-borne pathogens in domestic animals, ectoparasites, and their owners in a rural community in Southwest Guatemala
Vector-borne pathogens, which are transmitted by blood-feeding arthropods to animals and people, are common in tropical regions where, combined with economic factors, can cause significant public health burden. A community-level study was undertaken in southwestern Guatemala to assess the presence of vector-borne pathogens in blood samples from humans (n = 98), their animals (n = 90), and ectoparasites (n = 83) over a period of 2 weeks. Human capillary blood was collected from participant's index finger, and animal venous blood (chickens, pigs, dogs, and cats) was collected from the jugular or cephalic veins at the enrollment period of a concurrent study. Ectoparasites (fleas, ticks, and lice) were collected from dogs at the time of the blood collection. Total DNA was extracted from the human blood, animal blood, and ectoparasites and assayed using published PCR assays for Anaplasma spp., Bartonella spp., and Ehrlichia spp. Ectoparasites were also tested for the presence of Rickettsia spp. DNA by PCR. Anaplasma spp. DNA was amplified from 1 of 39 (2.6 %) chickens and 1 of 6 (16.6 %) turkeys. All human and dog blood samples were negative for Bartonella spp. in the same community. Ehrlichia spp. DNA was amplified from 12 (60 %) of 20 dogs and sequencing documented Ehrlichia spp. in 2 dogs and the ticks and fleas collected from these dogs. All the Ehrlichia spp.-positive sequences showed 100 % homology to E. canis sequences and other uncultured Ehrlichia spp. strains isolated from animals. Rickettsia spp. DNA was not amplified from any of the ectoparasites assessed. Our findings suggest that Ehrlichia spp. are common in dogs and Anaplasma spp. are circulating in poultry in a rural community in southwest Guatemala. We expect these results to be used in awareness campaigns and public health interventions to reduce vector borne pathogens in the region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
97 days
期刊介绍: Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports focuses on aspects of veterinary parasitology that are of regional concern, which is especially important in this era of climate change and the rapid and often unconstrained travel of people and animals. Relative to regions, this journal will accept papers of the highest quality dealing with all aspects of disease prevention, pathology, treatment, epidemiology, and control of parasites within the field of veterinary medicine. Also, case reports will be considered as they add to information related to local disease and its control; such papers must be concise and represent appropriate medical intervention. Papers on veterinary parasitology from wildlife species are acceptable, but only if they relate to the practice of veterinary medicine. Studies on vector-borne bacterial and viral agents are suitable, but only if the paper deals with vector transmission of these organisms to domesticated animals. Studies dealing with parasite control by means of natural products, both in vivo and in vitro, are more suited for one of the many journals that now specialize in papers of this type. However, due to the regional nature of much of this research, submissions may be considered based upon a case being made by the author(s) to the Editor. Circumstances relating to animal experimentation must meet the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals as issued by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (obtainable from: Executive Secretary C.I.O.M.S., c/o W.H.O., Via Appia, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信