由假单胞菌sp. G31和固氮杆菌sp. PBC2组成的非本地PGPB联合体促进了冬小麦的生长,并轻微改变了本地细菌群落。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
J Dobrzyński, I Kulkova, Z Jakubowska, B Wróbel
{"title":"由假单胞菌sp. G31和固氮杆菌sp. PBC2组成的非本地PGPB联合体促进了冬小麦的生长,并轻微改变了本地细菌群落。","authors":"J Dobrzyński, I Kulkova, Z Jakubowska, B Wróbel","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-86820-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) are considered an effective eco-friendly biostimulator. However, relatively few studies have examined how PGPB affect the native bacterial community of major crops. Thus, this study investigates the impact of a PGPB consortium, comprising Pseudomonas sp. G31 and Azotobacter sp. PBC2 (P1A), on the soil bacterial community of wheat under field conditions. As a result of PGPB application, we observed a significant increase in seed yield, as well as in nitrate content (1st and 3rd time points) and available phosphorus (2nd time point) in the rhizosphere compared to control. For the metataxonomic study, Next-Generation Sequencing was performed using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system. The consortium used did not have a significant impact on the diversity of native soil bacteria and slightly affected the taxonomic composition of bacteria with no significant changes in bacterial dominants at the phylum and genus level. Nevertheless, 3 weeks after application, P1A increased the relative abundance of Nitrospira which could have influenced the increase in nitrates in the rhizosphere, and also decreased Bdellovibrio. The results indicate that the P1A consortium, due to its ability to promote plant growth without detrimental alternations in the bacterial community of the soil, may be a potential candidate for commercialization.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"3248"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-native PGPB consortium consisting of Pseudomonas sp. G31 and Azotobacter sp. PBC2 promoted winter wheat growth and slightly altered the native bacterial community.\",\"authors\":\"J Dobrzyński, I Kulkova, Z Jakubowska, B Wróbel\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-86820-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) are considered an effective eco-friendly biostimulator. However, relatively few studies have examined how PGPB affect the native bacterial community of major crops. Thus, this study investigates the impact of a PGPB consortium, comprising Pseudomonas sp. G31 and Azotobacter sp. PBC2 (P1A), on the soil bacterial community of wheat under field conditions. As a result of PGPB application, we observed a significant increase in seed yield, as well as in nitrate content (1st and 3rd time points) and available phosphorus (2nd time point) in the rhizosphere compared to control. For the metataxonomic study, Next-Generation Sequencing was performed using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system. The consortium used did not have a significant impact on the diversity of native soil bacteria and slightly affected the taxonomic composition of bacteria with no significant changes in bacterial dominants at the phylum and genus level. Nevertheless, 3 weeks after application, P1A increased the relative abundance of Nitrospira which could have influenced the increase in nitrates in the rhizosphere, and also decreased Bdellovibrio. The results indicate that the P1A consortium, due to its ability to promote plant growth without detrimental alternations in the bacterial community of the soil, may be a potential candidate for commercialization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"3248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762297/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86820-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86820-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物生长促进菌(PGPB)被认为是一种有效的生态友好型生物刺激剂。然而,关于PGPB如何影响主要作物的原生细菌群落的研究相对较少。因此,本研究探讨了由假单胞菌sp. G31和固氮杆菌sp. PBC2 (P1A)组成的PGPB联合体在田间条件下对小麦土壤细菌群落的影响。与对照相比,施用PGPB显著提高了种子产量、根际硝酸盐含量(第1和第3时间点)和有效磷含量(第2时间点)。对于元分类学研究,使用Illumina NovaSeq 6000系统进行新一代测序。使用的联合体对土壤原生细菌的多样性无显著影响,对细菌的分类组成有轻微影响,在门和属水平上细菌优势没有显著变化。然而,施用3周后,P1A增加了硝化螺旋菌的相对丰度,这可能影响了根际硝酸盐的增加,也减少了蛭弧菌。结果表明,由于P1A财团能够促进植物生长而不会对土壤细菌群落产生有害影响,因此可能是商业化的潜在候选物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Non-native PGPB consortium consisting of Pseudomonas sp. G31 and Azotobacter sp. PBC2 promoted winter wheat growth and slightly altered the native bacterial community.

Non-native PGPB consortium consisting of Pseudomonas sp. G31 and Azotobacter sp. PBC2 promoted winter wheat growth and slightly altered the native bacterial community.

Non-native PGPB consortium consisting of Pseudomonas sp. G31 and Azotobacter sp. PBC2 promoted winter wheat growth and slightly altered the native bacterial community.

Non-native PGPB consortium consisting of Pseudomonas sp. G31 and Azotobacter sp. PBC2 promoted winter wheat growth and slightly altered the native bacterial community.

Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) are considered an effective eco-friendly biostimulator. However, relatively few studies have examined how PGPB affect the native bacterial community of major crops. Thus, this study investigates the impact of a PGPB consortium, comprising Pseudomonas sp. G31 and Azotobacter sp. PBC2 (P1A), on the soil bacterial community of wheat under field conditions. As a result of PGPB application, we observed a significant increase in seed yield, as well as in nitrate content (1st and 3rd time points) and available phosphorus (2nd time point) in the rhizosphere compared to control. For the metataxonomic study, Next-Generation Sequencing was performed using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system. The consortium used did not have a significant impact on the diversity of native soil bacteria and slightly affected the taxonomic composition of bacteria with no significant changes in bacterial dominants at the phylum and genus level. Nevertheless, 3 weeks after application, P1A increased the relative abundance of Nitrospira which could have influenced the increase in nitrates in the rhizosphere, and also decreased Bdellovibrio. The results indicate that the P1A consortium, due to its ability to promote plant growth without detrimental alternations in the bacterial community of the soil, may be a potential candidate for commercialization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信