易受浸渍影响的内不稳定土壤PSD特性研究。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Xingjie Zhang, Ahmed Benamar, Linjun Yang, Jun Zhu, Mohamad Oueidat, Yulong Luo
{"title":"易受浸渍影响的内不稳定土壤PSD特性研究。","authors":"Xingjie Zhang, Ahmed Benamar, Linjun Yang, Jun Zhu, Mohamad Oueidat, Yulong Luo","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-87411-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internal instability of embankment soils under seepage can occur in two distinct ways: suffusion and suffosion. Suffusion involves the removal of fine particles from the matrix without causing significant disturbance to the soil skeleton, while suffosion is characterized by the movement of fine particles accompanied by skeleton collapse or deformation. In terms of dam safety, suffosion poses a greater threat than suffusion. While extensive research has focused on establishing geometric criteria to assess the internal instability of soils prone to suffusion, current criteria fail to predict the occurrence of suffosion. To address this gap, this paper presents a comprehensive analysis by collecting a large amount of experimental data from existing literature, as well as conducting a series of suffusion/suffosion tests. Through this analysis, two characteristic parameters have been identified: fines content (F<sub>f</sub>) and the retention ratio (D'<sub>15</sub>/d'<sub>85</sub>) which represents the relationship between coarse and fine particles. Soils including fines content greater than 35% are susceptible to suffosion, while soils with fines content lower than 20% are prone to suffusion. For soils with fines content ranging between 20 and 35%, suffosion occurs when F<sub>f</sub> > 2.73 D'<sub>15</sub>/d'<sub>85</sub> + 0.89. These findings provide valuable insights for future analyses of soil internal stability and contribute to enhancing dam safety. The combination of literature data and suffusion tests offers a robust base for assessing the risk of suffosion and suffusion in soils, allowing more accurate evaluation of soil behavior and effective mitigation strategies in dam engineering.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"3202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation into the PSD characteristics of internally unstable soils susceptible to suffosion.\",\"authors\":\"Xingjie Zhang, Ahmed Benamar, Linjun Yang, Jun Zhu, Mohamad Oueidat, Yulong Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-87411-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Internal instability of embankment soils under seepage can occur in two distinct ways: suffusion and suffosion. Suffusion involves the removal of fine particles from the matrix without causing significant disturbance to the soil skeleton, while suffosion is characterized by the movement of fine particles accompanied by skeleton collapse or deformation. In terms of dam safety, suffosion poses a greater threat than suffusion. While extensive research has focused on establishing geometric criteria to assess the internal instability of soils prone to suffusion, current criteria fail to predict the occurrence of suffosion. To address this gap, this paper presents a comprehensive analysis by collecting a large amount of experimental data from existing literature, as well as conducting a series of suffusion/suffosion tests. Through this analysis, two characteristic parameters have been identified: fines content (F<sub>f</sub>) and the retention ratio (D'<sub>15</sub>/d'<sub>85</sub>) which represents the relationship between coarse and fine particles. Soils including fines content greater than 35% are susceptible to suffosion, while soils with fines content lower than 20% are prone to suffusion. For soils with fines content ranging between 20 and 35%, suffosion occurs when F<sub>f</sub> > 2.73 D'<sub>15</sub>/d'<sub>85</sub> + 0.89. These findings provide valuable insights for future analyses of soil internal stability and contribute to enhancing dam safety. The combination of literature data and suffusion tests offers a robust base for assessing the risk of suffosion and suffusion in soils, allowing more accurate evaluation of soil behavior and effective mitigation strategies in dam engineering.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"3202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762289/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87411-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87411-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

渗流作用下路堤土的内部失稳有两种不同的表现形式:扩散失稳和扩散失稳。渗透是指细颗粒从基质中移除,而不会对土壤骨架造成明显的扰动,而渗透的特征是细颗粒的运动伴随着骨架的坍塌或变形。就大坝安全而言,溢流比溢流的威胁更大。虽然广泛的研究集中于建立几何准则来评估容易发生渗水的土壤的内部不稳定性,但目前的准则无法预测渗水的发生。为了弥补这一空白,本文从现有文献中收集了大量的实验数据,并进行了一系列的弥漫/弥漫试验,进行了全面的分析。通过分析,确定了两个特征参数:细粒含量(Ff)和保留比(D’15/ D’85),代表了粗粒和细粒的关系。细粒含量大于35%的土壤易发生浸透,而细粒含量低于20%的土壤易发生浸透。细粒含量在20% ~ 35%之间的土壤,在Ff > 2.73 D'15/ D' 85 + 0.89时发生渗水。这些发现为今后分析土壤内部稳定性提供了有价值的见解,并有助于提高大坝的安全性。文献数据和渗透试验的结合为评估土壤的渗透和渗透风险提供了坚实的基础,从而可以更准确地评估大坝工程中的土壤行为和有效的缓解策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Investigation into the PSD characteristics of internally unstable soils susceptible to suffosion.

Investigation into the PSD characteristics of internally unstable soils susceptible to suffosion.

Investigation into the PSD characteristics of internally unstable soils susceptible to suffosion.

Investigation into the PSD characteristics of internally unstable soils susceptible to suffosion.

Internal instability of embankment soils under seepage can occur in two distinct ways: suffusion and suffosion. Suffusion involves the removal of fine particles from the matrix without causing significant disturbance to the soil skeleton, while suffosion is characterized by the movement of fine particles accompanied by skeleton collapse or deformation. In terms of dam safety, suffosion poses a greater threat than suffusion. While extensive research has focused on establishing geometric criteria to assess the internal instability of soils prone to suffusion, current criteria fail to predict the occurrence of suffosion. To address this gap, this paper presents a comprehensive analysis by collecting a large amount of experimental data from existing literature, as well as conducting a series of suffusion/suffosion tests. Through this analysis, two characteristic parameters have been identified: fines content (Ff) and the retention ratio (D'15/d'85) which represents the relationship between coarse and fine particles. Soils including fines content greater than 35% are susceptible to suffosion, while soils with fines content lower than 20% are prone to suffusion. For soils with fines content ranging between 20 and 35%, suffosion occurs when Ff > 2.73 D'15/d'85 + 0.89. These findings provide valuable insights for future analyses of soil internal stability and contribute to enhancing dam safety. The combination of literature data and suffusion tests offers a robust base for assessing the risk of suffosion and suffusion in soils, allowing more accurate evaluation of soil behavior and effective mitigation strategies in dam engineering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信