Xingjie Zhang, Ahmed Benamar, Linjun Yang, Jun Zhu, Mohamad Oueidat, Yulong Luo
{"title":"易受浸渍影响的内不稳定土壤PSD特性研究。","authors":"Xingjie Zhang, Ahmed Benamar, Linjun Yang, Jun Zhu, Mohamad Oueidat, Yulong Luo","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-87411-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internal instability of embankment soils under seepage can occur in two distinct ways: suffusion and suffosion. Suffusion involves the removal of fine particles from the matrix without causing significant disturbance to the soil skeleton, while suffosion is characterized by the movement of fine particles accompanied by skeleton collapse or deformation. In terms of dam safety, suffosion poses a greater threat than suffusion. While extensive research has focused on establishing geometric criteria to assess the internal instability of soils prone to suffusion, current criteria fail to predict the occurrence of suffosion. To address this gap, this paper presents a comprehensive analysis by collecting a large amount of experimental data from existing literature, as well as conducting a series of suffusion/suffosion tests. Through this analysis, two characteristic parameters have been identified: fines content (F<sub>f</sub>) and the retention ratio (D'<sub>15</sub>/d'<sub>85</sub>) which represents the relationship between coarse and fine particles. Soils including fines content greater than 35% are susceptible to suffosion, while soils with fines content lower than 20% are prone to suffusion. For soils with fines content ranging between 20 and 35%, suffosion occurs when F<sub>f</sub> > 2.73 D'<sub>15</sub>/d'<sub>85</sub> + 0.89. These findings provide valuable insights for future analyses of soil internal stability and contribute to enhancing dam safety. The combination of literature data and suffusion tests offers a robust base for assessing the risk of suffosion and suffusion in soils, allowing more accurate evaluation of soil behavior and effective mitigation strategies in dam engineering.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"3202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation into the PSD characteristics of internally unstable soils susceptible to suffosion.\",\"authors\":\"Xingjie Zhang, Ahmed Benamar, Linjun Yang, Jun Zhu, Mohamad Oueidat, Yulong Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-87411-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Internal instability of embankment soils under seepage can occur in two distinct ways: suffusion and suffosion. Suffusion involves the removal of fine particles from the matrix without causing significant disturbance to the soil skeleton, while suffosion is characterized by the movement of fine particles accompanied by skeleton collapse or deformation. In terms of dam safety, suffosion poses a greater threat than suffusion. While extensive research has focused on establishing geometric criteria to assess the internal instability of soils prone to suffusion, current criteria fail to predict the occurrence of suffosion. To address this gap, this paper presents a comprehensive analysis by collecting a large amount of experimental data from existing literature, as well as conducting a series of suffusion/suffosion tests. Through this analysis, two characteristic parameters have been identified: fines content (F<sub>f</sub>) and the retention ratio (D'<sub>15</sub>/d'<sub>85</sub>) which represents the relationship between coarse and fine particles. Soils including fines content greater than 35% are susceptible to suffosion, while soils with fines content lower than 20% are prone to suffusion. For soils with fines content ranging between 20 and 35%, suffosion occurs when F<sub>f</sub> > 2.73 D'<sub>15</sub>/d'<sub>85</sub> + 0.89. These findings provide valuable insights for future analyses of soil internal stability and contribute to enhancing dam safety. The combination of literature data and suffusion tests offers a robust base for assessing the risk of suffosion and suffusion in soils, allowing more accurate evaluation of soil behavior and effective mitigation strategies in dam engineering.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"3202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762289/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87411-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87411-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigation into the PSD characteristics of internally unstable soils susceptible to suffosion.
Internal instability of embankment soils under seepage can occur in two distinct ways: suffusion and suffosion. Suffusion involves the removal of fine particles from the matrix without causing significant disturbance to the soil skeleton, while suffosion is characterized by the movement of fine particles accompanied by skeleton collapse or deformation. In terms of dam safety, suffosion poses a greater threat than suffusion. While extensive research has focused on establishing geometric criteria to assess the internal instability of soils prone to suffusion, current criteria fail to predict the occurrence of suffosion. To address this gap, this paper presents a comprehensive analysis by collecting a large amount of experimental data from existing literature, as well as conducting a series of suffusion/suffosion tests. Through this analysis, two characteristic parameters have been identified: fines content (Ff) and the retention ratio (D'15/d'85) which represents the relationship between coarse and fine particles. Soils including fines content greater than 35% are susceptible to suffosion, while soils with fines content lower than 20% are prone to suffusion. For soils with fines content ranging between 20 and 35%, suffosion occurs when Ff > 2.73 D'15/d'85 + 0.89. These findings provide valuable insights for future analyses of soil internal stability and contribute to enhancing dam safety. The combination of literature data and suffusion tests offers a robust base for assessing the risk of suffosion and suffusion in soils, allowing more accurate evaluation of soil behavior and effective mitigation strategies in dam engineering.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.