改良股骨近端钉治疗股骨转子间逆倾斜骨折的生物力学评价。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Qian Wang, Liang Sun, Lu Liu, Teng Ma, Zhong Li, Kun Zhang, Qiang Huang
{"title":"改良股骨近端钉治疗股骨转子间逆倾斜骨折的生物力学评价。","authors":"Qian Wang, Liang Sun, Lu Liu, Teng Ma, Zhong Li, Kun Zhang, Qiang Huang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-87951-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The best treatment method for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures (ROIFs) is still under debate. Our team designed the modified proximal femoral nail (MPFN) specially for treating such fractures. The objective of this research was to introduce the MPFN device and compare the biomechanical properties with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and InterTAN nail via finite element modelling. An AO/OTA 31-A3.1 ROIF model was established via Mimics software. Three implants were depicted and assembled on the ROIF models. The axial, bending, and torsion loads were simulated to test stress and displacement of three fixation models. Compared to the PFNA and InterTAN models, the MPFN model had more dispersed stress distribution under axial loads of 2,100 N. The MPFN showed lower von Mises stress on bones compared with that of PFNA and InterTAN in axial loads. In term of maximum displacement, the MPFN had a 12.6% reduction compared to the PFNA model in axial load case. In bending and torsion loads, the MPFN model also demonstrated better biomechanical properties than the PFNA and InterTAN models. The modified proximal femoral nail presented the best biomechanical performance, followed by the InterTAN nail, and the PFNA for fixing reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures. The MPFN has the potential to be a promising device for patients with ROIFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"3261"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical evaluation of the modified proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Qian Wang, Liang Sun, Lu Liu, Teng Ma, Zhong Li, Kun Zhang, Qiang Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-87951-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The best treatment method for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures (ROIFs) is still under debate. Our team designed the modified proximal femoral nail (MPFN) specially for treating such fractures. The objective of this research was to introduce the MPFN device and compare the biomechanical properties with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and InterTAN nail via finite element modelling. An AO/OTA 31-A3.1 ROIF model was established via Mimics software. Three implants were depicted and assembled on the ROIF models. The axial, bending, and torsion loads were simulated to test stress and displacement of three fixation models. Compared to the PFNA and InterTAN models, the MPFN model had more dispersed stress distribution under axial loads of 2,100 N. The MPFN showed lower von Mises stress on bones compared with that of PFNA and InterTAN in axial loads. In term of maximum displacement, the MPFN had a 12.6% reduction compared to the PFNA model in axial load case. In bending and torsion loads, the MPFN model also demonstrated better biomechanical properties than the PFNA and InterTAN models. The modified proximal femoral nail presented the best biomechanical performance, followed by the InterTAN nail, and the PFNA for fixing reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures. The MPFN has the potential to be a promising device for patients with ROIFs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"3261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763255/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87951-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87951-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反斜转子间骨折(roif)的最佳治疗方法仍在争论中。我们的团队设计了改良股骨近端钉(MPFN)专门用于治疗此类骨折。本研究的目的是介绍MPFN装置,并通过有限元模型比较其与股骨近端防旋转钉(PFNA)和InterTAN钉的生物力学性能。通过Mimics软件建立AO/OTA 31-A3.1 ROIF模型。在ROIF模型上描绘并组装了三个植入物。模拟轴向、弯曲和扭转载荷,测试三种固定模型的应力和位移。与PFNA和InterTAN模型相比,MPFN模型在2100 n轴向载荷下的应力分布更分散,MPFN在轴向载荷下对骨骼的von Mises应力较PFNA和InterTAN模型低。在轴向载荷情况下,MPFN模型的最大位移比PFNA模型减少了12.6%。在弯曲和扭转载荷下,MPFN模型也比PFNA和InterTAN模型表现出更好的生物力学性能。改良股骨近端钉具有最佳的生物力学性能,其次是InterTAN钉和PFNA,用于固定股骨转子间反向倾斜骨折。MPFN有潜力成为roif患者的一种有前途的设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biomechanical evaluation of the modified proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.

Biomechanical evaluation of the modified proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.

Biomechanical evaluation of the modified proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.

Biomechanical evaluation of the modified proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.

The best treatment method for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures (ROIFs) is still under debate. Our team designed the modified proximal femoral nail (MPFN) specially for treating such fractures. The objective of this research was to introduce the MPFN device and compare the biomechanical properties with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and InterTAN nail via finite element modelling. An AO/OTA 31-A3.1 ROIF model was established via Mimics software. Three implants were depicted and assembled on the ROIF models. The axial, bending, and torsion loads were simulated to test stress and displacement of three fixation models. Compared to the PFNA and InterTAN models, the MPFN model had more dispersed stress distribution under axial loads of 2,100 N. The MPFN showed lower von Mises stress on bones compared with that of PFNA and InterTAN in axial loads. In term of maximum displacement, the MPFN had a 12.6% reduction compared to the PFNA model in axial load case. In bending and torsion loads, the MPFN model also demonstrated better biomechanical properties than the PFNA and InterTAN models. The modified proximal femoral nail presented the best biomechanical performance, followed by the InterTAN nail, and the PFNA for fixing reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures. The MPFN has the potential to be a promising device for patients with ROIFs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信