益生菌和饮食管理对肠易激综合征患者的影响:一项系统综述和网络meta分析。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Yupeng Lei, Xuemei Sun, Tiechao Ruan, Wenting Lu, Bixin Deng, Ruixi Zhou, Dezhi Mu
{"title":"益生菌和饮食管理对肠易激综合征患者的影响:一项系统综述和网络meta分析。","authors":"Yupeng Lei, Xuemei Sun, Tiechao Ruan, Wenting Lu, Bixin Deng, Ruixi Zhou, Dezhi Mu","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The efficacy of probiotics and diet management in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is controversial, and their relative effectiveness remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotics, diet management, and their combination on IBS.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 10, 2023, for relevant studies, including symptom relief, IBS-symptom severity score (-SSS), and IBS-quality of life measure (-QOL).</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two investigators independently performed the data extraction and quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>A network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach and a random-effects model to estimate the relative risk (RR) and 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four articles were eligible for this study. In relieving IBS symptoms, compared with a sham diet, a low-fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyols (low-FODMAP) diet (RR: 3.22; 95% CI: 1.70-6.26) and low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics (RR: 17.79; 95% CI: 3.27-112.54) significantly relieved IBS symptoms. The control group showed significantly lower effectiveness than the probiotics group (RR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.32-0.69). According to the surface under the cumulative rank curve (SUCRA), a low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics (80.4%) had the best effect in relieving IBS symptoms, followed by a low-FODMAP diet (70.8%), probiotics (65.1%), and a gluten-free diet (54.3%). In reducing the total IBS-SSS, the low-FODMAP diet (90.5%) was the most effective, followed by the low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics (76.6%), probiotics alone (62.3%), and gluten-free diet (28.3%). In reducing total IBS-QOL, probiotics (72.1%) ranked first, followed by gluten-free (57.0%) and low-FODMAP (56.9%) diets. Probiotics (34.9%) were associated with the lowest risk of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics is most effective in relieving IBS symptoms. A low-FODMAP diet is the most recommended diet for alleviating IBS severity, and probiotics were associated with improving the QOL of patients with IBS, with the fewest adverse events.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024499113.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Probiotics and Diet Management in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yupeng Lei, Xuemei Sun, Tiechao Ruan, Wenting Lu, Bixin Deng, Ruixi Zhou, Dezhi Mu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nutrit/nuae217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The efficacy of probiotics and diet management in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is controversial, and their relative effectiveness remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotics, diet management, and their combination on IBS.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 10, 2023, for relevant studies, including symptom relief, IBS-symptom severity score (-SSS), and IBS-quality of life measure (-QOL).</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two investigators independently performed the data extraction and quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>A network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach and a random-effects model to estimate the relative risk (RR) and 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four articles were eligible for this study. In relieving IBS symptoms, compared with a sham diet, a low-fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyols (low-FODMAP) diet (RR: 3.22; 95% CI: 1.70-6.26) and low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics (RR: 17.79; 95% CI: 3.27-112.54) significantly relieved IBS symptoms. The control group showed significantly lower effectiveness than the probiotics group (RR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.32-0.69). According to the surface under the cumulative rank curve (SUCRA), a low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics (80.4%) had the best effect in relieving IBS symptoms, followed by a low-FODMAP diet (70.8%), probiotics (65.1%), and a gluten-free diet (54.3%). In reducing the total IBS-SSS, the low-FODMAP diet (90.5%) was the most effective, followed by the low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics (76.6%), probiotics alone (62.3%), and gluten-free diet (28.3%). In reducing total IBS-QOL, probiotics (72.1%) ranked first, followed by gluten-free (57.0%) and low-FODMAP (56.9%) diets. Probiotics (34.9%) were associated with the lowest risk of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics is most effective in relieving IBS symptoms. A low-FODMAP diet is the most recommended diet for alleviating IBS severity, and probiotics were associated with improving the QOL of patients with IBS, with the fewest adverse events.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024499113.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae217\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:益生菌和饮食管理对肠易激综合征(IBS)的疗效存在争议,它们的相对效果尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评估益生菌、饮食管理及其联合使用对肠易激综合征的影响。数据来源:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane和Web of Science检索自成立至2023年7月10日的相关研究,包括症状缓解,ibs -症状严重程度评分(-SSS)和ibs -生活质量测量(-QOL)。数据提取:两名研究者独立进行数据提取和质量评估。数据分析:使用频率分析方法和随机效应模型进行网络荟萃分析,以估计相对风险(RR)和95% CI。结果:44篇文章符合本研究的条件。在缓解IBS症状方面,与假饮食相比,低发酵低聚糖、双糖、单糖和多元醇(低fodmap)饮食(RR: 3.22;95% CI: 1.70-6.26)和低fodmap饮食联合益生菌(RR: 17.79;95% CI: 3.27-112.54)显著缓解IBS症状。对照组的有效性显著低于益生菌组(RR: 0.47;95% ci: 0.32-0.69)。从累积等级曲线下曲面(SUCRA)来看,低fodmap饲粮联合益生菌对IBS症状的缓解效果最好(80.4%),其次是低fodmap饲粮(70.8%)、益生菌(65.1%)和无麸质饲粮(54.3%)。在降低总IBS-SSS方面,低fodmap日粮(90.5%)效果最好,其次是低fodmap日粮联合益生菌(76.6%)、益生菌单独(62.3%)和无麸质日粮(28.3%)。在降低总体IBS-QOL方面,益生菌(72.1%)排名第一,其次是无麸质(57.0%)和低fodmap(56.9%)饮食。益生菌(34.9%)与最低的不良反应风险相关。结论:低fodmap饮食结合益生菌对缓解IBS症状最有效。低fodmap饮食是最推荐的缓解IBS严重程度的饮食,益生菌与改善IBS患者的生活质量相关,不良事件最少。系统评审注册:普洛斯彼罗注册号。CRD42024499113。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Probiotics and Diet Management in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Context: The efficacy of probiotics and diet management in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is controversial, and their relative effectiveness remains unclear.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotics, diet management, and their combination on IBS.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 10, 2023, for relevant studies, including symptom relief, IBS-symptom severity score (-SSS), and IBS-quality of life measure (-QOL).

Data extraction: Two investigators independently performed the data extraction and quality assessment.

Data analysis: A network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach and a random-effects model to estimate the relative risk (RR) and 95% CI.

Results: Forty-four articles were eligible for this study. In relieving IBS symptoms, compared with a sham diet, a low-fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyols (low-FODMAP) diet (RR: 3.22; 95% CI: 1.70-6.26) and low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics (RR: 17.79; 95% CI: 3.27-112.54) significantly relieved IBS symptoms. The control group showed significantly lower effectiveness than the probiotics group (RR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.32-0.69). According to the surface under the cumulative rank curve (SUCRA), a low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics (80.4%) had the best effect in relieving IBS symptoms, followed by a low-FODMAP diet (70.8%), probiotics (65.1%), and a gluten-free diet (54.3%). In reducing the total IBS-SSS, the low-FODMAP diet (90.5%) was the most effective, followed by the low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics (76.6%), probiotics alone (62.3%), and gluten-free diet (28.3%). In reducing total IBS-QOL, probiotics (72.1%) ranked first, followed by gluten-free (57.0%) and low-FODMAP (56.9%) diets. Probiotics (34.9%) were associated with the lowest risk of adverse effects.

Conclusion: A low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics is most effective in relieving IBS symptoms. A low-FODMAP diet is the most recommended diet for alleviating IBS severity, and probiotics were associated with improving the QOL of patients with IBS, with the fewest adverse events.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024499113.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信